Determinants and Consequences of Female Attractiveness and Sexiness: Realistic Tests with Restaurant Waitresses
Waitresses completed an on-line survey about their physical characteristics, self-perceived attractiveness and sexiness, and average tips. The waitresses’ self-rated physical attractiveness increased with their breast sizes and decreased with their ages, waist-to-hip ratios, and body sizes. Similar effects were observed on self-rated sexiness, with the exception of age, which varied with self-rated sexiness in a negative, quadratic relationship rather than a linear one. Moreover, the waitresses’ tips varied with age in a negative, quadratic relationship, increased with breast size, increased with having blond hair, and decreased with body size. These findings, which are discussed from an evolutionary perspective, make several contributions to the literature on female physical attractiveness. First, they replicate some previous findings regarding the determinants of female physical attractiveness using a larger, more diverse, and more ecologically valid set of stimuli than has been studied before. Second, they provide needed evidence that some of those determinants of female beauty affect interpersonal behaviors as well as attractiveness ratings. Finally, they indicate that some determinants of female physical attractiveness do not have the same effects on overt interpersonal behavior (such as tipping) that they have on attractiveness ratings. This latter contribution highlights the need for more ecologically valid tests of evolutionary theories about the determinants and consequences of female beauty.
KeywordsAttractiveness Sexiness Tipping Evolutionary theory
I would like to thank Vivienne Wildes and the waiter at waiterrant.net for help in recruiting subjects.
- Cunningham, M. R., Druen, P. B., & Barbee, A. P. (1997). Angels, mentors, and friends: Trade-offs among evolutionary, social, and individual variables in physical appearance. In J. A. Simpson & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 109–140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Feinman, S., & Gill, G. W. (1978). Sex differences in physical attractiveness preferences. Journal of Social Psychology, 105, 43–52.Google Scholar
- Jackson, L. A. (1992). Physical appearance and gender: Sociobiological and sociocultural perspectives. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Jones, D. (1996). Physical attractiveness and the theory of sexual selection. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology.Google Scholar
- Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75–91.Google Scholar
- Lynn, M. (2007). [Online restaurant server survey]. Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
- Lynn, M., & McCall, M. (2000). Beyond gratitude and gratuity: A meta-analytic review of the predictors of restaurant tipping. Working paper, School of Hotel Administration, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
- Miller, C. (2006). Perceived differences between blonde and brunette females: Intelligence, promiscuity and attractiveness. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Northern Colorado, Greely, CO.Google Scholar
- Schmitt, D. P., Shackelford, T. K., Duntley, J., Tooke, W., Buss, D. M., Fisher, M. L., et al. (2002). Is there an early-30’s peak in female sexual desire? Cross-sectional evidence from the United States and Canada. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 11, 1–18.Google Scholar
- Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual culture (pp. 80–118). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). All across the U.S.A.: Population distribution and composition, 2000. Population profile of the United States: 2000. Retrieved July 30, 2007, from http://www.census.gov