Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 38, Issue 6, pp 959–973 | Cite as

Assessing the Propensity for Sexual Coaxing and Coercion in Relationships: Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity of the Tactics to Obtain Sex Scale

  • Joseph A. Camilleri
  • Vernon L. Quinsey
  • Jennifer L. Tapscott
Original Paper

Abstract

Although there are measures of sexual interest and sexual conflict in romantic relationships, none discriminate between sexual coaxing and sexual coercion or are sensitive to proximal changes in the propensity to use such strategies. In order to study these changes, we developed the Tactics to Obtain Sex Scale (TOSS) to assess self-reported likelihood of engaging in sexual coercion and sexual coaxing with a romantic partner. In Study 1, a sample of men and women (N = 419) in heterosexual relationships completed the TOSS and measures of its predicted correlates, including antisociality and mating success. An exploratory factor analysis of TOSS scores yielded a two-factor solution. As predicted, the two-factor solution identified coaxing (COAX) and coercion (COERCE) subscales. There was good internal reliability for TOSS, COAX, and COERCE scales (Cronbach alphas > .89). Significant correlations between COAX and self-perceived mating success and between COERCE and psychopathy provided preliminary evidence of construct validity. In Study 2, we replicated the factor structure and established the scale as a reliable and valid index of partner sexual coercion and coaxing propensity.

Keywords

Sexual coercion Sexual coaxing Relationships Scale development 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ron Holden, Bob Montgomerie, Lee Fabrigar, the Editor, and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for their financial support, and Heidi Chan, Nicole Vigneault, Katherine Alexander, and Melissa Van Wert for their help with data collection and entry.

References

  1. Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apt, C., & Hurlbert, D. F. (1992). Motherhood and female sexuality beyond one year postpartum: A study of military wives. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 18, 104–114.Google Scholar
  3. Basile, K. C. (2002). Prevalence of wife rape and other intimate partner sexual coercion in a nationally representative sample of women. Violence and Victims, 17, 511–524.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brecklin, L. R., & Forde, D. R. (2001). A meta-analysis of rape education programs. Violence and Victims, 16, 303–321.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Buss, D. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 616–628.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Calhoun, K. S., Bernat, J. A., Clum, G. A., & Frame, C. L. (1997). Sexual coercion and attraction to sexual aggression in a community sample of young men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 392–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Call, V., Sprecher, S., & Schwartz, P. (1995). The incidence and frequency of marital sex in a national sample. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 639–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Camilleri, J. A., & Quinsey, V. L. (2008). Pedophilia: Assessment and treatment. In D. R. Laws & W. O’Donohue (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment (2nd ed., pp. 183–212). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Deitz, S. R., Blackwell, K. T., Daley, P. C., & Bentley, B. J. (1982). Measurement of empathy toward rape victims and rapists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 372–384.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. DeMaris, A. (1997). Elevated sexual activity in violent marriages: Hypersexuality or sexual extortion? Journal of Sex Research, 34, 361–373.Google Scholar
  14. DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 269–322). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  16. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forth, A. E., Brown, S. L., Hart, S. D., & Hare, R. D. (1996). The assessment of psychopathy in male and female noncriminals: Reliability and validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 531–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goetz, A. T., & Shackelford, T. K. (2006). Sexual coercion and forced in-pair copulation as sperm competition tactics in humans. Human Nature, 17, 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2008). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Greer, A. E., & Buss, D. M. (1994). Tactics for promoting sexual encounters. The Journal of Sex Research, 31, 185–201.Google Scholar
  21. Hanneke, C. R., & Shields, N. A. (1985). Marital rape: Implications for the helping professionals. Social Casework: The Journal of Contemporary Social Work, 66, 451–458.Google Scholar
  22. Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. J. R. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 6–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hare, R. D. (1991). Manual for the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  24. Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Camilleri, J. A. (2004). Applying a forensic actuarial assessment (the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide) to nonforensic patients. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1063–1074.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hines, D. A., & Saudino, K. J. (2003). Gender differences in psychological, physical, and sexual aggression among college students using the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale. Violence and Victims, 18, 197–217.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jesser, C. J. (1978). Male response to direct verbal sexual initiatives of females. Journal of Sex Research, 14, 118–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koss, M. P., & Oros, C. J. (1982). Sexual experiences survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 455–457.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lalumière, M. L., Chalmers, L. J., Quinsey, V. L., & Seto, M. C. (1996). A test of the mate deprivation hypothesis of sexual coercion. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 299–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lalumière, M. L., Harris, G. T., Quinsey, V. L., & Rice, M. E. (2005). The causes of rape: Understanding individual differences in male propensity for sexual aggression. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  30. Landolt, M. A., Lalumière, M. L., & Quinsey, V. L. (1995). Sex differences in intra-sex variations in human mating tactics: An evolutionary approach. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Malamuth, N. M. (1989). The attraction to sexual aggression scale: Part one. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 26–49.Google Scholar
  32. Malamuth, N. (1998). The revised Attraction to Sexual Aggression scale. In C. M. Davis, W. H. Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. Schreer, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Sexuality-related measures: A compendium (pp. 52–55). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Meng, X., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 172–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Monson, C. M., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (1998). Sexual and nonsexual marital aggression: Legal considerations, epidemiology, and an integrated typology of perpetrators. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 3, 369–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mosher, D. L., & Anderson, R. D. (1986). Macho personality, sexual aggression, and reactions to guided imagery of realistic rape. Journal of Research in Personality, 20, 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 32, 396–402.Google Scholar
  37. Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Paulhus Deception Scales (PDS): The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding-7. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  38. Paulhus, D. L., Hemphill, J. F., & Hare, R. D. (in press). Manual for the Self-Report Psychopathy Scale (SRP-III). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  39. Payne, D. L., Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (2006). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  41. Quinsey, V. L., Jones, G. B., Book, A. S., & Barr, K. N. (2006). The dynamic prediction of antisocial behavior among forensic psychiatric patients: A prospective field study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 1539–1565.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Rapaport, K., & Burkhart, B. R. (1984). Personality and attitudinal characteristics of sexually coercive college males. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93, 216–221.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Reddon, J. R. (1992). A_STAT: Statistical hypotheses and utilities (Version 2.0). Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Russell, D. E. H. (1990). Rape in marriage (2nd ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Shackelford, T. K., & Goetz, A. T. (2004). Men’s sexual coercion in intimate relationships: Development and initial validation of the Sexual Coercion in Intimate Relationships Scale. Violence and Victims, 19, 541–556.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Spector, I. P., Carey, M. P., & Steinberg, L. (1996). The Sexual Desire Inventory: Development, factor structure, and evidence of reliability. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 22, 175–190.Google Scholar
  47. Statistics Canada. (2004). Family violence in Canada: A statistical profile. http://www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/85-224-XIE/85-224-XIE2004000.pdf. Accessed 31 January 2008
  48. Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2). Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  50. TenVergert, E., Kingma, J., & Gillespie, M. W. (1990). Dichotomous items and extreme item difficulties: Factor analysis of the Conflict Tactics Scale. Methodika, 4, 47–57.Google Scholar
  51. Udry, J. R. (1980). Changes in the frequency of marital intercourse from panel data. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 9, 319–325.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Waldner, L. K., Vaden-Goad, L., & Sikka, A. (1999). Sexual coercion in India: An exploratory analysis using demographic variables. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28, 523–538.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wong, S. C. P., & Gordon, A. (2006). The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale: A treatment-friendly violence risk assessment tool. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 279–309.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph A. Camilleri
    • 1
  • Vernon L. Quinsey
    • 1
  • Jennifer L. Tapscott
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations