Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 235–243 | Cite as

Attraction to Sexual Violence Towards Women, Sexual Abuse of Children, and Non-Sexual Criminal Behavior: Testing the Specialist vs. Generalist Models in Male College Students

  • Emily K. Voller
  • Patricia J. LongEmail author
  • Allison C. Aosved
Original Paper

Abstract

A sample of 492 college men anonymously completed an expanded version of the Sexual Experiences Survey, the revised Attraction to Sexual Aggression Scale, and the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale Short Form to investigate the relations among perpetration of sexual violence (including rape and sexual assault), attraction to sexual violence, attraction to childhood sexual abuse, and attraction towards other crimes while controlling for the impact of social desirability. Analyses indicated that attractions towards sexual violence, general criminality, and childhood sexual abuse were all significantly interrelated. In addition, sexual assault perpetrators reported higher levels of all three types of attraction as compared to nonperpetrators whereas rape perpetrators reported higher levels of attraction to sexual aggression and criminality. Clinical and research implications are discussed.

Keywords

Sexual assault Rape Perpetration Criminality Child sexual abuse 

References

  1. Abbey, A., & McAuslan, P. (2004). A longitudinal examination of male college students’ perpetration of sexual assault. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 747–756.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbey, A., McAuslan, P., Zawacki, T., Clinton, A. M., & Buck, P. O. (2001). Attitudinal, experiential, and situational predictors of sexual assault perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 784–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abbey, A., Zawacki, T., Buck, P. O., Clinton, A. M., & McAuslan, P. (2004). Sexual assault and alcohol consumption: What do we know about their relationship and what types of research are still needed? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 271–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abel, G. G., Becker, J. V., Murphy, W. D., & Flanagan, B. (1981). Identifying dangerous child molesters. In R. B. Stuart (Ed.), Violent behavior (pp. 116–137). New York: Bruner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  5. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  6. Aosved, A. C., & Long, P. J. (2005, November). The role of intolerant attitudes, rape myth acceptance, and rape proclivity in the prediction of perpetration of sexual aggression. Presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Advancement of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  7. Aosved, A. C., & Long, P. J. (2006). The co-occurrence of rape myth acceptance, sexism, racism, homophobia, ageism, classism, and religious intolerance. Sex Roles, 55, 481–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Das, S., & Moitra, S. D. (1988). Specialization and seriousness during adult criminal careers. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 4, 303–345.Google Scholar
  9. Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., & Farrington, D. P. (1988a). Criminal career research: Its value for criminology. Criminology, 26, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., & Farrington, D. P. (1988b). Longitudinal and criminal career research: Further clarifications. Criminology, 26, 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bohner, G., Jarvis, C. I., Eyssel, F., & Siebler, F. (2005). The causal impact of rape myth acceptance on men’s rape proclivity: Comparing sexually coercive and noncoercive men. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 819–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dean, K. E., & Malamuth, N. M. (1997). Characteristics of men who aggress sexually and of men who imagine aggressing: Risk and moderating variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 449–455.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farrington, D. P. (1992). Criminal career research in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Criminology, 32, 521–536.Google Scholar
  14. Farrington, D. P., Snyder, H. S., & Finnegan, T. A. (1988). Specialization in juvenile court careers. Criminology, 26, 461–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Guay, J. P., Proulx, J., Cusson, M., & Ouimet, M. (2001). Victim-choice polymorphia among serious sex offenders. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 521–533.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hagan, M. P., & Gust-Brey, K. L. (1999). A ten-year longitudinal study of adolescent rapists upon return to the community. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43, 448–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hall, G. C. N., & Proctor, W. C. (1987). Criminological predictors of recidivism in a sexual offender population. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 111–112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hanson, K. R., Scott, H., & Steffy, R. A. (1995). A comparison of child molesters and nonsexual criminals: Risk predictors and long-term recidivism. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koss, M. P., & Gidycz, C. A. (1985). Sexual experiences survey: Reliability and validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 422–423.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lalumière, M. L., Chalmers, L. J., Quinsey, V. L., & Seto, M. C. (1996). A test of the mate deprivation hypothesis of sexual coercion. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 299–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lalumière, M. L., Harris, G. T., Quinsey, V. L., & Rice, M. E. (2005). The causes of rape. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  24. Lalumière, M. L., & Quinsey, V. L. (1996). Sexual deviance, antisociality, mating effort, and the use of sexually coercive behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lussier, P. (2005). The criminal activity of sexual offenders in adulthood: Revisiting the specialization debate. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 269–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lussier, P., LeBlanc, M., & Proulx, J. (2005). The generality of criminal behavior: A confirmatory factor analysis of the criminal activity of sex offenders in adulthood. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Malamuth, N. M. (1986). Predictors of naturalistic sexual aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 953–962.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Malamuth, N. M. (1989a). The Attraction to Sexual Aggression Scale: Part one. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 26–49.Google Scholar
  29. Malamuth, N. M. (1989b). The Attraction to Sexual Aggression Scale: Part two. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 324–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Malamuth, N. M. (1998). The revised Attraction to Sexual Aggression Scale. In C. M. Davis, W. H. Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. Schreer, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Sexuality-related measures: A compendium (pp. 52–55). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Malamuth, N. M. (2003). Criminal and noncriminal sexual aggressors: Integrating psychopathy in a hierarchical-mediational confluence model. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 33–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Malamuth, N. M., Linz, D., Heavey, C. L., Barnes, G., & Acker, M. (1995). Using the confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men’s conflict with women: A 10-year follow-up study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 353–369.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Malamuth, N. M., Sockloskie, R. J., Koss, M. P., & Tanaka, J. S. (1991). Characteristics of aggressors against women: Testing a model using a national sample of college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 670–681.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Messman-Moore, T. L., & Long, P. J. (2000). Child sexual abuse and revictimization in the form of adult sexual abuse, adult physical abuse, and adult psychological maltreatment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Messman-Moore, T. L., Long, P. J., & Siegfried, N. J. (2000). The revictimization of child sexual abuse survivors: An examination of the adjustment of college women with child sexual abuse, adult sexual assault, and adult physical abuse. Child Maltreatment, 5, 18–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Linton, M. A. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 186–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Muehlenhard, C. L., Powch, I. G., Phelps, J. I., & Giusti, L. M. (1992). Definitions of rape: Scientific and political implications. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Myers, J. K., & Bean, L. L. (1968). A decade later: A follow up of social class and mental illness. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Osland, J. A., Fitch, M., & Willis, E. E. (1996). Likelihood to rape in college males. Sex Roles, 35, 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prentky, R. A., & Knight, R. A. (1991). Identifying critical dimensions for discriminating among rapists. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 643–661.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pritchard, C., & Bagley, C. (2000). Multi-criminal and violent groups among child sex offenders: A heuristic typology in a 2-year cohort of 374 men in two English counties. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 579–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rapaport, K., & Burkhart, B. R. (1984). Personality and attitudinal characteristics of sexually coercive college males. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93, 216–221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Soothill, K., Francis, B., Sanderson, B., & Ackerley, E. (2000). Sex offenders: Specialists, generalists—or both? British Journal of Criminology, 40, 56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the national violence against women survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Research in Brief (NJC 172837).Google Scholar
  46. Weinrott, M. R., & Saylor, M. (1991). Self-report crimes committed by sex offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6, 286–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zawacki, T., Abbey, A., Buck, P. O., McAuslan, P., & Clinton-Sherrod, A. M. (2003). Perpetrators of alcohol-involved sexual assaults: How do they differ from other sexual assault perpetrators and noperpetrators. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 366–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emily K. Voller
    • 1
  • Patricia J. Long
    • 2
    Email author
  • Allison C. Aosved
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyOklahoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of La VerneLa VerneUSA
  3. 3.Department of Veteran AffairsPacific Islands Health Care SystemHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations