Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 498–502 | Cite as

A Social Psychology of a History of a Snippet in the Psychology of Transgenderism

  • Madeline H. Wyndzen
Peer Commentary

This is not a simple story. It is so complex that it is hard to know what is the story. For Dreger, the story is the plight of Bailey after he wrote The Man Who Would Be Queen. I would not define the situation this way, but the intersection of our perspectives is very personal to me. I am a psychologist with passionate convictions about the value of our field as a scientific endeavor. I am also transgendered and have, at times, identified myself as everything from “oh no, not me” to cross-dresser, to transsexual, to bi-gendered (someone who embraces different gender roles in different situations).1 I was a member of Bailey’s “sexnet” discussion list for years before his book and I corresponded with many “pro-” and “anti-” autogynephilia advocates. I was among the first members of Arune’s discussion list for the support of those who identify with autogynephilia, even though I disagree with autogynephilia as a scientific account. I know the “us-versus-them”2group polarization mentality...

References

  1. Bailey, J. M. (2003). The man who would be queen: The science of gender-bending and transsexualism. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blanchard, R. (1989). The concept of autogynephilia and the typology of male gender dysphoria. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 177, 616–623.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanchard, R. (1991). Clinical observations and systematic studies of autogynephilia. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 17, 235–251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanchard, R., Clemmensen, L. H., & Steiner, B. W. (1985). Social desirability response set and systematic distortion in the self-report of adult male gender patients. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 505–516.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanchard, R., Racansky, I. G., & Steiner, B. W. (1986). Phallometric detection of fetishistic arousal in heterosexual male cross-dressers. Journal of Sex Research, 22, 452–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bornstein, K. (1994). Gender outlaw: On men, women, and the rest of us. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  7. Gilovich, T., & Savitsky, K. (1996). Like goes with like: The role of representativeness in erroneous and pseudoscientific beliefs. The Skeptical Inquirer, 20(2), 34–40.Google Scholar
  8. Janis, I. L. (1971). Groupthink among policy makers. In N. Sanford & C. Comstock (Eds.), Sanctions for evil (pp. 71–89). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Lawrence, A. A. (1998). Men trapped in men’s bodies: An introduction to the concept of autogynephilia. Transgender Tapestry, 1(85), 65–68.Google Scholar
  10. Lawrence, A. A. (2006). Clinical and theoretical parallels between desire for limb amputation and gender identity disorder. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 263–278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lawrence, A. A. (2007). Becoming what we love: Autogynephilic transsexualism conceptualized as an expression of romantic love. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 50, 506–520.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McCloskey, D. N. (1999). Crossing: A memoir. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcoming. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 173–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Smith, Y. L., van Goozen, S. H., Kuiper, A. J., & Cohen-Kettenis, P. T. (2005). Transsexual subtypes: Clinical and theoretical significance. Psychiatry Research, 137, 151–160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1975). Point of view and perception of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 439–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 21, 453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wyndzen, M. H. (1998). All mixed up. A “Gender Identity Disorder” (GID) case study that’s an autobiography of a transsexual psychology graduate student. Available at http://www.genderpsychology.org/gid_case_study/. Retrieved 31 Dec 1998.
  18. Wyndzen, M. H. (2003). Autogynephilia and Ray Blanchard’s mis-directed sex-drive model of transsexuality. Available at http://www.GenderPsychology.org/autogynpehilia/ray_blanchard/. Retrieved 31 Dec 2003.
  19. Wyndzen, M. H. (2004). The banality of insensitivity: Portrayals of transgenderism in psychopathology. Available at http://www.genderpsychology.org/psychology/mental_illness_model.html. Retrieved 31 Dec 2004.
  20. Wyndzen, M. H. (2005). The world according to J. Michael Bailey inside “The Man who would be Queen: The Science of Gender Bending and Transsexualism.” Available at http://www.GenderPsychology.org/autogynpehilia/j_michael_bailey/. Retrieved 31 Dec 2005.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GenderPsychology.orgWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations