Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 453–456 | Cite as

Truth, Lies, and Trans Science

  • Riki LaneEmail author
Peer Commentary

Bailey (2003) wrote that the treatment of transsexuals on talk shows was “designed to provoke rather than to illuminate” (p. 146), a comment which also seems apt for his The Man Who Would Be Queen (TMWWBQ). Dreger’s account of the ensuing controversy may also provoke, despite her stated intentions and careful acknowledgement of her position as a participant in the controversy. Dreger’s article has some positives—her detailed account of events before and after TMWWBQ’s publication allows some insight into the unfolding battles. She gives a reasonable “analytic synopsis” of TMWWBQ, which brings out the causes for offence to trans people in their negative portrayals and the nature of the book’s cover and title. Dreger pointedly challenges common assumptions made by Bailey’s critics about his statements and highlights the stifling of discussion about erotic aspects of trans people’s experience and the tensions among the different factions.

As I am researching the political and social...

Keywords

Gender Identity Gender Identity Disorder Academic Misconduct Trans People Political Battle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bailey, J. M. (2003). The man who would be queen: The science of gender-bending and transsexualism. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blanchard, R. (1985). Typology of male-to-female transsexualism. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 247–261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanchard, R. (1993). Varieties of autogynephilia and their relationship to gender dysphoria. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 241–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dreger, A. D. (1998). Hermaphrodites and the medical invention of sex. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ekins, R., & King, D. (2006). The transgender phenomenon. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Roughgarden, J. (2004). Psychology perverted. http://www.ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Reviews/Psychology%20Perverted%20-%20by%20Joan%20Roughgarden.htm. Retrieved 7 November 2007.
  7. Smith, Y. L. S., van Goozen, S. H. M., Kuiper, A. J., & Cohen-Kettenis, P. T. (2005). Transsexual subtypes: Clinical and theoretical significance. Psychiatry Research, 137, 151–160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Zhou, J. N., Hofman, M. A., Gooren, L. J., & Swaab, D. F. (1995). A sex difference in the human brain and its relation to transsexuality. Nature, 378, 68–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social ScienceLa Trobe UniversityBundooraAustralia

Personalised recommendations