Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 491–494 | Cite as

A Matter of Perspective: A Transsexual Woman-Centric Critique of Dreger’s “Scholarly History” of the Bailey Controversy



  1. Bailey, J. M. (2003). The man who would be queen: The science of gender-bending and transsexualism. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, K. (2001, Spring). Some observations on autogynephilia. Transgender Tapestry, 1(93), 24–25, 62.Google Scholar
  3. Bolin, A. (1988). In search of Eve: Transsexual rites of passage. South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Harvey.Google Scholar
  4. Currah, P., Juang, R. M., & Minter, S. P. (Eds.). (2006). Transgender rights. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dreger, A. D. (2006, June 7). The blog I write in fear. Retrieved November 3, 2007, from
  6. Johnson, D. A. (2001, Summer). Is sex necessary? Transgender Tapestry, 1(94), 33–36.Google Scholar
  7. Namaste, V. K. (2000). Invisible lives: The erasure of transsexual and transgendered people. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Roughgarden, J. (2004, February 11). The Bailey affair: Psychology perverted. Retrieved November 3, 2007, from
  9. Serano, J. (2007). Whipping girl: A transsexual woman on sexism and the scapegoating of femininity. Emeryville, CA: Seal Press.Google Scholar
  10. Wyndzen, M. H. (2004). Everything you never wanted to know about autogynephilia (but were afraid you had to ask). Retrieved November 3, 2007, from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Molecular and Cell BiologyUniversity of California at BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations