Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 476–480 | Cite as

Dreger on the Bailey Controversy: Lost in the Drama, Missing the Big Picture

  • Margaret Nichols
Peer Commentary

Dreger describes herself as an historian, a bioethicist, and a “queer activist.” In this essay, she fails at all three. She has described the Bailey controversy myopically, without placing it in its larger sociocultural context. She ignores the history of queer activism and its relationship to psychiatry. She is particularly oblivious to changes in the emerging transgender movement. The transgender community, and the professionals who work within it, are in the midst of a revolution, but Dreger hasn’t noticed. Under a veneer of neutrality, Dreger has aligned herself with the conservative rearguard of professionals, not realizing that changes in the field are already rendering much of that rearguard obsolete. Shocked by some of the tactics, she has missed the symbolic significance of the uproar over TMWWBQ. As transwoman Herman (2007) put in her critique of Dreger’s paper: “To focus on the overzealous response of some trans activists is to miss the bigger picture—that transsexuals are...

Keywords

Gender Dysphoria Pedophilia Transsexualism Gender Identity Disorder Trans People 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bailey, J. M. (1999). Homosexuality and mental illness [Comment]. Archives of General Psychiatry, 36, 883–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayer, R. (1987). Homosexuality and American psychiatry: The politics of diagnosis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Carey, B. (2007, August 21). Criticism of a gender theory, and a scientist under siege. New York Times, pp. S1, S6.Google Scholar
  4. Dreger, A. D. (2007, June 20). Liberty and solidarity: May we choose children for sexual orientation? Bioethics Forum. Retrieved September 24, 2007 from http://www.Bioethicsforum.org/science-gaydar-homosexuality-prenatal-selection.asp.
  5. Greenberg, A. S., & Bailey, J. M. (2001). Parental selection of children’s sexual orientation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 423–437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Herman, J. (2007, September 4). Why the Bailey controversy won’t die soon. Advocate.com. Retrieved September 12, 2007 from http://www.advocate.com/exclusive_detail_ektid48612.asp.
  7. Karasic, D., & Drescher, J. (Eds.). (2005). Sexual and gender diagnoses of the diagnostic and statistical manual (DSM). New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  8. Lawrence, A. A. (2006). Clinical and theoretical parallels between desire for limb amputation and gender identity disorder. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 263–278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lev, A. I. (2004). Transgender emergence: Therapeutic guidelines for working with gender-variant people and their families. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  10. Rochman, S. (2007, November 20). What’s up, doc? Would removing transgender from the list of mental disorders do more harm than good? The Advocate, pp. 32–35.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Personal GrowthHighland ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations