Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 434–438 | Cite as

Deconstructing the Feminine Essence Narrative

  • Ray Blanchard
Peer Commentary

In Dreger’s history of the controversy surrounding Bailey’s (2003) work on femininity in biological males, she refers to the popular view of male-to-female transsexualism as the feminine essence narrative. Because my commentary considers the feminine essence view as a set of propositions rather than as a story, I will refer to it as the feminine essence theory.

Dreger presents the main ideas of the theory quite clearly enough for the purposes of her history. She writes, for example, that according to the feminine essence theory, “trans people suffer from a sort of trick of nature, whereby they have the brain of one gender in the body typical of the other. Thus the trans person has a sort of neurological intersex condition, typically understood to be inborn.” She does not, however, formally enumerate the distinguishable elements and implications of the theory, an exercise that would have taken her beyond the scope of her article. Such an analysis is the subject of this commentary. My...

Keywords

Gender Identity Sexual Arousal Natal Woman Gender Identity Disorder Transsexualism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bailey, J. M. (2003). The man who would be queen: The science of gender-bending and transsexualism. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, J. M., & Triea, K. (2007). What many transgender activists don’t want you to know—and why you should know it anyway. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 50, 521–534.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanchard, R. (1985). Typology of male-to-female transsexualism. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 247–261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanchard, R. (1988). Nonhomosexual gender dysphoria. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 188–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanchard, R. (1989a). The concept of autogynephilia and the typology of male gender dysphoria. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 177, 616–623.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanchard, R. (1989b). The classification and labeling of nonhomosexual gender dysphorias. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 18, 315–334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanchard, R. (2000). Part II: The case for publicly funded transsexual surgery. Psychiatry Rounds, 4(2), 4–6.Google Scholar
  8. Blanchard, R. (2003). Theoretical and clinical parallels between body integrity identity disorder and gender identity disorder. Paper presented at the Third Annual International BIID Meeting, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Blanchard, R. (2005). Early history of the concept of autogynephilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 439–446.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buhrich, N. (1978). Motivation for cross-dressing in heterosexual transvestism. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 57, 145–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lawrence, A. A. (2004). Autogynephilia: A paraphilic model of gender identity disorder. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Psychotherapy, 8, 69–87.Google Scholar
  12. Lawrence, A. A. (2008). Male-to-female transsexual subtypes: Sexual arousal with cross-dressing and physical measurements [Letter to the Editor]. Psychiatry Research, 159, 319–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Smith, Y. L. S., van Goozen, S. H. M., Kuiper, A. J., & Cohen-Kettenis, P. T. (2005). Transsexual subtypes: Clinical and theoretical significance. Psychiatry Research, 137, 151–160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Law and Mental Health ProgramCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations