University Students’ Definitions of Sexual Abstinence and Having Sex
We asked 298 heterosexual Canadian university students about their definitions of the terms abstinence and having sex. For both terms, students were provided with a list of 17 sexual behaviors and indicated whether they would include each in their definition. The majority of both male and female students included activities that did not involve genital stimulation in their definition of sexual abstinence and did not include these activities in their definition of having sex. Conversely, most students did not include bidirectional sexual stimulation (penile–vaginal intercourse or penile–anal intercourse) in their definitions of sexual abstinence but did include them in their definitions of having sex. Students were quite mixed in whether activities involving unidirectional genital stimulation (e.g., oral sex, genital fondling) constituted abstinence, having sex, or neither abstinence nor having sex. However, they were more likely to see these behaviors as abstinent than as having sex. Students were more likely to rate a behavior as abstinence if orgasm did not occur. A canonical correlation analysis was used to examine the patterns of association between a number of predictors and inclusions of behaviors involving no genital stimulation, unidirectional stimulation, and bidirectional genital stimulation in abstinence definitions. The results indicated that male participants who were more involved with their religion and sexually conservative, less sexually experienced, and who had not received sexual health education at home were more likely to define bidirectional genital stimulation and less likely to define no genital stimulation and unidirectional sexual stimulation as sexual abstinence. The research and health promotion implications of these results are discussed.
KeywordsSexual abstinence Having sex Sexual definitions Sexual health
- Bogart, L. M., Cecil, H., Wagstaff, D. A., Pinkerton, S. D., & Abramson, P. R. (2000). Is it “sex?”: College students’ interpretations of sexual behavior terminology. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 108–116.Google Scholar
- Canadian Federation for Sexual Health. (2007). Abstinence. Retrieved March 1, 2007 from http://www.ppfc/content.asp?articleid=305.
- Carpenter, L. M. (2001). The ambiguity of “having sex”: The subjective experience of virginity loss in the United States. Journal of Sex Research, 38, 127–139.Google Scholar
- Donnelly, J., Goldfarb, E., Duncan, D. F., Young, M., Eadie, C., & Casiglia, D. (1999). Self-esteem and sex attitudes as predictors of sexual abstinence by inner-city early adolescents. North American Journal of Psychology, 1, 205–212.Google Scholar
- Hudson, W. W., & Murphy, G. J. (1998). Sexual Attitude Scale. In C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. Schreer, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 83–84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Hudson, W. W., Murphy, G. J., & Nurius, P. S. (1983). A short-form scale to measure liberal vs. conservative orientation toward human sexual expression. Journal of Sex Research, 19, 258–272.Google Scholar
- Hyde, J. S., DeLamater, J. D., & Byers, E. S. (2004). Understanding human sexuality: Third Canadian edition. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
- Loewenson, P. R., Ireland, M., & Resnick, M. D. (2004). Primary and secondary sexual abstinence in high school students. Journal of Adolescent Sexual Health, 34, 209–215.Google Scholar
- National Consensus Process. (2006). The national consensus process on sexual health and responsible sexual behavior: Interim report. Atlanta, GA: Morehouse School of Medicine.Google Scholar
- Randall, H. E., & Byers, E. S. (2003). What is sex?: Students’ definitions of having sex, sexual partner, and unfaithful sexual behaviour. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 12, 87–96.Google Scholar
- Rasberry, C. N., & Goodson, P. (2007). Predictors of secondary abstinence in U.S. college undergraduates. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9214-z.
- Trenholm, C., Devaney, B., Fortson, K., Quay, L., Wheeler, J., & Clark, M. (2007). Impacts of four Title V section 510 abstinence education programs: Final report (MPR Ref. No. 8549-110). Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research Inc.Google Scholar