Social Perception of Facial Resemblance in Humans
- First Online:
- 1.3k Downloads
Two lines of reasoning predict that highly social species will have mechanisms to influence behavior toward individuals depending on their degree of relatedness. First, inclusive fitness theory leads to the prediction that organisms will preferentially help closely related kin over more distantly related individuals. Second, evaluation of the relative costs and potential benefits of inbreeding suggests that the degree of kinship should also be considered when choosing a mate. In order to behaviorally discriminate between individuals with different levels of relatedness, organisms must be able to discriminate cues of kinship. Facial resemblance is one such potential cue in humans. Computer-graphic manipulation of face images has made it possible to experimentally test hypotheses about human kin recognition by facial phenotype matching. We review recent experimental evidence that humans respond to facial resemblance in ways consistent with inclusive fitness theory and considerations of the costs of inbreeding, namely by increasing prosocial behavior and positive attributions toward self-resembling images and selectively tempering attributions of attractiveness to other-sex faces in the context of a sexual relationship.
KeywordsFaces Resemblance Kin recognition Social perception Assortative mating
- Bateson, P. (1980). Optimal outbreeding and the development of sexual preferences in Japanese quail. Zietschrift fur Tierpsychologie, 53, 231–244.Google Scholar
- Bateson, P. (1983). Optimal outbreeding. In P. Bateson (Ed.), Mate choice (pp. 257–278). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bressan, P., Bertamini, M., Nalli, A., & Zanutto, A. (submitted). Effect of self-resemblance in child faces on hypothetical parental investment choices in men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior.Google Scholar
- Byard, P. J., Poosha, D. V., Satyanarayana, M., & Rao, D. C. (1985a). Family resemblance for components of craniofacial size and shape. Journal of Craniofacial Genetic Developmental Biology, 5, 229–238.Google Scholar
- Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1984). A sociobiological analysis of human infanticide. In G. Hausfater & S. Hrdy (Eds.), Infanticide: Comparative and evolutionary perspectives (pp. 487–502). New York: Aldine Press.Google Scholar
- Epstein, E., & Guttman, R. (1982). Mate selection in man: Evidence, theory, and outcome. Social Biology, 31, 243–276.Google Scholar
- Euler, H. A., & Weitzel, B. (1999). Grandparental caregiving and intergenerational relations reflect reproductive strategies. In J. M. van der Dennen, D. Smillie, & D. R. Wilson (Eds.), The Darwinian heritage and sociobiology: Human evolution, behavior, and intelligence (pp. 243–252). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
- Holmes, W. G., & Sherman, P. W. (1982). The ontogeny of kin recognition in two species of ground squirrels. American Zoologist, 22, 491–517.Google Scholar
- Irons, W. (1986). Incest: Why all the fuss? Paper presented at the Evolution and Human Behavior meeting, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
- Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Perrett, D. I., Little, A. C., Feinberg, D. R., & Law Smith, M. J. (2008). Effects of menstrual cycle phase on face preferences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9268y.
- Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L., DeBruine, L. M., Feinberg, D. R., Law Smith, M. J., et al. (2005a). Commitment to relationships and preferences for femininity and apparent health in faces are strongest on days of the menstrual cycle when progesterone level is high. Hormones and Behavior, 48, 283–290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krupp, D. B., DeBruine, L. M., & Barclay, P. (in press). A cue of kinship promotes cooperation for the public good. Evolution and Human Behavior. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.08.002.
- Platek, S. M. (2002). Unconscious reactions to children’s faces: The effect of resemblance. Evolution and Cognition, 8, 207–214.Google Scholar
- Westermarck, E. A. (1921). The history of human marriage (5th ed.). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Wolf, A. P. (1995). Sexual attraction and childhood association: A Chinese brief for Edward Westermarck. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Zei, G., Astolfi, P., & Jayakar, S. D. (1983). Correlation between father’s age and husband’s age: A case of imprinting. Journal of Biosocial Science, 15, 116–117.Google Scholar