Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 359–363 | Cite as

Finger Length Ratio (2D:4D) in Adults with Gender Identity Disorder

  • Bernd KraemerEmail author
  • Thomas Noll
  • Aba Delsignore
  • Gabriella Milos
  • Ulrich Schnyder
  • Urs Hepp
Original Paper

Abstract

From early childhood, gender identity and the 2nd to 4th finger length ratio (2D:4D) are discriminative characteristics between sexes. Both the human brain and 2D:4D may be influenced by prenatal testosterone levels. This calls for an examination of 2D:4D in patients with gender identity disorder (GID) to study the possible influence of prenatal testosterone on gender identity. Until now, the only study carried out on this issue suggests lower prenatal testosterone levels in right-handed male-to-female GID patients (MtF). We compared 2D:4D of 56 GID patients (39 MtF; 17 female-to-male GID patients, FtM) with data from a control sample of 176 men and 190 women. Bivariate group comparisons showed that right hand 2D:4D in MtF was significantly higher (feminized) than in male controls, but similar to female controls. The comparison of 2D:4D ratios of biological women revealed significantly higher (feminized) values for right hands of right handed FtM. Analysis of variance confirmed significant effects for sex and for gender identity on 2D:4D ratios but not for sexual orientation or for the interaction among variables. Our results indirectly point to the possibility of a weak influence of reduced prenatal testosterone as an etiological factor in the multifactorially influenced development of MtF GID. The development of FtM GID seems even more unlikely to be notably influenced by prenatal testosterone.

Keywords

Transsexualism Gender identity disorder Testosterone 2D:4D 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the Editor for assistance in the preparation of this article.

References

  1. Baum, M. J. (1979). Differentiation of coital behavior in mammals: A comparative analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 3, 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, S., Bosinski, H. A., Clement, U., Elcher, W., Goerlich, T. M., Hartmann, U., et al. (1997). Standards in treatment and assessment of transsexual patients. German Society of Sexual Research, Academy of Sexual Medicine and Society of Sexual Science. Zentralblatt für Gynäkologie, 119, 398–401.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanchard, R. (1985). Typology of male-to-female transsexualism. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 247–261.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanchard, R. (1988). Nonhomosexual gender dysphoria. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 188–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanchard, R. (1989). The concept of autogynephilia and the typology of male gender dysphoria. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 177, 616–623.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, W. M., Finn, C. J., Cooke, B. M., & Breedlove, S. M. (2002). Differences in finger length ratios between self-identified “butch” and “femme” lesbians. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 123–127.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooke, B., Hegstrom, C. D., Villeneuve, L. S., & Breedlove, S. M. (1998). Sexual differentiation of the vertebrate brain: Principles and mechanisms. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 19, 323–362.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gooren, L. (2006). The biology of human psychosexual differentiation. Hormones and Behavior, 50, 589–601.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gooren, L. J., & Kruijver, F. P. (2002). Androgens and male behavior. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 198, 31–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hepp, U., & Buddeberg, C. (1999). Assessment and treatment of transsexualism. Schweizerische Rundschau für Medizin Praxis, 88, 1975–1979.Google Scholar
  11. Kraemer, B., Noll, T., Delsignore, A., Milos, G., Schnyder, U., & Hepp, U. (2006). Finger length ratio (2D:4D) and dimensions of sexual orientation. Neuropsychobiology, 53, 210–214.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lippa, R. A. (2003). Are 2D:4D finger-length ratios related to sexual orientation? Yes for men, no for women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 179–188.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Manning, J. T., Churchill, A. J., & Peters, M. (2007). The effects of sex, ethnicity, and sexual orientation on self-measured digit ratio (2D:4D). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 223–233.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Manning, J. T., Scutt, D., Wilson, J., & Lewis-Jones, D. I. (1998). The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: A predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. Human Reproduction, 13, 3000–3004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. McFadden, D., Loehlin, J. C., Breedlove, S. M., Lippa, R. A., Manning, J. T., & Rahman, Q. (2005). A reanalysis of five studies on sexual orientation and the relative length of the 2nd and 4th fingers (the 2D:4D ratio). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 341–356.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. McFadden, D., & Shubel, E. (2002). Relative lengths of fingers and toes in human males and females. Hormones and Behavior, 42, 492–500.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Migeon, C. J., & Wisniewski, A. B. (1998). Sexual differentiation: From genes to gender. Hormone Research, 50, 245–251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Peters, M., Mackenzie, K., & Bryden, P. (2002). Finger length and distal finger extent patterns in humans. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 117, 209–217.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rahman, Q., & Wilson, G. D. (2003). Sexual orientation and the 2nd to 4th finger length ratio: Evidence for organising effects of sex hormones or developmental instability? Psychoneuroendocrinology, 28, 288–303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Robinson, S. J., & Manning, J. T. (2000). The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length and male homosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 333–345.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Schneider, H. J., Pickel, J., & Stalla, G. K. (2006). Typical female 2nd−4th finger length (2D:4D) ratios in male-to-female transsexuals-possible implications for prenatal androgen exposure. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 31, 265–269.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith, Y. L. S., van Goozen, S. H. M., Kuiper, A. J., & Cohen-Kettenis, P. T. (2005). Transsexual subtypes: Clinical and theoretical significance. Psychiatry Research, 137, 151–160.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Tanner, J. (1990). Fetus into man: Physical growth from conception to maturity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Voracek, M., Manning, J. T., & Ponocny, I. (2005). Digit ratio (2D:4D) in homosexual and heterosexual men from Austria. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 335–340.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Williams, T. J., Pepitone, M. E., Christensen, S. E., Cooke, B. M., Huberman, A. D., Breedlove, N. J., et al. (2000). Finger-length ratios and sexual orientation. Nature, 404, 455–456.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernd Kraemer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Thomas Noll
    • 2
  • Aba Delsignore
    • 1
  • Gabriella Milos
    • 1
  • Ulrich Schnyder
    • 1
  • Urs Hepp
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity Hospital ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Psychiatrisch-Psychologischer DienstZurichSwitzerland
  3. 3.Psychiatrische Dienste Aargau AGBadenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations