Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 166–172 | Cite as

Neurodevelopmental Correlates of Paraphilic Sexual Interests in Men

  • Qazi RahmanEmail author
  • Deano J. Symeonides


The etiology of anomalous, or paraphilic, sexual preferences in men is unclear although a growing literature points to their prenatal neurodevelopmental ontogenesis. The present study explored whether this was also apparent in a community sample of 200 heterosexual men by examining their sexual fantasies using the Wilson Sex Fantasy Questionnaire (WSFQ) and several demographic and somatic neurodevelopmental markers, including sibling sex composition, handedness, maternal and paternal age at birth, second to fourth finger length ratios, and fluctuating asymmetry of finger lengths and wrist widths. Responses to the WSFQ were used to quantify the extent of paraphilic interest by computing a variance-quotient (or VQ) previously shown to differentiate paraphilic from conventional heterosexual males. High paraphilic scorers had a significantly greater number of older brothers, higher right-hand 2D:4D, and a trend for lower Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI) scores compared to low-paraphilic scorers. Correlational analysis revealed a significant positive association of VQ scores with number of older brothers and significant negative associations with number of younger brothers and EHI scores (elevated paraphilic interests were correlated with elevated non-right handedness). Correlations between VQ scores and other variables were not significant. It is suggested that processes such as developmental instability and maternal immunity may play a role in variant sexual preferences among otherwise healthy heterosexual men.


Paraphilia Males Handedness Birth order Sexual fantasy Developmental instability Maternal immunity 


  1. Baumgartner, J. V., Scalora, M. J., & Huss, M. T. (2002). Assessment of the Wilson Sex Fantasy Questionnaire among child molesters and nonsexual forensic offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blanchard, R. (2004). Quantitative and theoretical analyses of the relation between older brothers and homosexuality in men. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 230, 173–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanchard, R., Barbaree, H. E., Bogaert, A. F., Dickey, R., Klassen, P., Kuban, M. E., & Zucker, K. J. (2000). Fraternal birth order and sexual orientation in pedophiles. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29, 463–478.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanchard, R., & Bogaert, A. F. (1996). Biodemographic comparisons of homosexual and heterosexual men in Kinsey interview data. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 25, 551–579.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanchard, R., & Bogaert, A. F. (1998). Birth order in homosexual versus heterosexual offenders against children, pubescents, and adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27, 595–603.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanchard, R., & Ellis, L. (2001). Birth weight, sexual orientation and the sex of preceding siblings. Journal of Biosocial Science, 33, 451–467.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanchard, R., Watson, M. S., Choy, A., Dickey, R., Klassen, P., Kuban, M. E., et al. (1999). Pedophiles: Mental retardation, maternal age, and sexual orientation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28, 111–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blanchard, R., Zucker, K. J., Cavacas, A., Allin, S., Bradley, S. J., & Schachter, D. C. (2002). Fraternal birth order and birth weight in probably prehomosexual feminine boys. Hormones and Behavior, 41, 321–327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bogaert, A. F. (2001). Handedness, criminality, and sexual offending. Neuropsychologia, 39, 465–469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bogaert, A. F. (2006). Biological versus nonbiological older brothers and men’s sexual orientation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 10771–10774.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bogaert, A. F., Bezeau, S., Kuban, M., & Blanchard, R. (1997). Pedophilia, sexual orientation, and birth order. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 331–335.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cantor, J. M., Blanchard, R., Christensen, B. K., Dickey, R., Klassen, P. E., Beckstead, A. L., et al. (2004). Intelligence, memory, and handedness in pedophilia. Neuropsychology, 18, 3–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cantor, J. M., Blanchard, R., Paterson, A. D., & Bogaert, A. F. (2002). How many gay men owe their sexual orientation to fraternal birth order? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 63–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cantor, J. M., Blanchard, R., Robichaud, L. K., & Christensen, B. K. (2005a). Quantitative reanalysis of aggregate data on IQ in sexual offenders. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 555–568.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cantor, J. M., Klassen, P. E., Dickey, R., Christensen, B. K., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., et al. (2005b). Handedness in pedophilia and hebephilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 447–459.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cotes, K., Earls, C. M., & Lalumiére, M. L. (2002). Birth order, birth interval, and deviant sexual preferences among sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunne, M. P., Martin, N. G., Bailey, J. M., Heath, A. C., Bucholz, K. K., Madden, P. A. F., et al. (1997). Participation bias in a sexuality survey: Psychological and behavioral characteristics of responders and non-responders. International Journal of Epidemiology, 26, 844–854.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geschwind, N., & Galaburda, A. M. (1985a). Cerebral lateralization, biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: I. A hypothesis and a program for research. Archives of Neurology, 42, 428–459.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Geschwind, N., & Galaburda, A. M. (1985b). Cerebral lateralization, biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: II. A hypothesis and program for research. Archives of Neurology, 42, 521–552.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gosselin, C. C., & Wilson, G. D. (1980). Sexual variations. London, England: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  21. Hare, E. H., & Moran, P. A. P. (1979). Paternal age and birth order in homosexual patients: A replication of Slater’s study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 178–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Iwawaki, S., & Wilson, G. D. (1983). Sex fantasies in Japan. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 543–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kinzler, W. L., Ananth, C. V., Smullian, J. C., & Vintzileos, A. M. (2002). Parental age difference and adverse perinatal outcome in the United States. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 16, 320–327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kowner, R. (2001). Psychological perspectives on human developmental instability and fluctuating asymmetry: Sources, applications and implications. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 447–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lalumiére, M. L., Blanchard, R., & Zucker, K. J. (2000). Sexual orientation and handedness in men and women: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 575–592.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lalumiére, M. L., Harris, G. T., Quinsey, V. L., & Rice, M. E. (1998). Sexual deviance and number of older brothers among sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leung, B., Forbes, M. R., & Houle, D. (2000). Fluctuating asymmetry as a bioindicator of stress: Comparing efficacy of analysis involving multiple traits. American Naturalist, 155, 101–115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lippa, R. A. (2003a). Handedness, sexual orientation, and gender-related personality traits in men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 103–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lippa, R. A. (2003b). Are 2D:4D finger length ratios related to sexual orientation? Yes for men, no for women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 179–188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. MacCulloch, S. I., Gray, N. S., Philips, H. K., Taylor, J., & MacCulloch, M. J. (2004). Birth order in sex-offending and aggressive-offending men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 467–474.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Manning, J. T. (2002). Digit ratio: A pointer to fertility, behavior and health. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Manning, J. T., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., & Sanders, G. (2001). The 2nd to 4th digit ratio and autism. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 43, 160–164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Manning, J. T., & Robinson, S. J. (2003). 2nd to 4th digit ratio and a universal mean for prenatal testosterone in homosexual men. Medical Hypotheses, 61, 303–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Manning, J. T., Trivers, R. L., Thornhill, R., & Singh, D. (2000). The 2nd:4th digit ratio and asymmetry of hand performance in Jamaican children. Laterality, 5, 121–132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McFadden, D., Loehlin, J. C., Breedlove, S. M., Lippa, R. A., Manning, J. T., & Rahman, Q. (2005). A reanalysis of five studies on sexual orientation and the relative length of index and ring fingers. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 341–356.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McFadden, D., & Schubel, E. (2002). Relative lengths of fingers and toes in human males and females. Hormones and Behavior, 42, 492–500.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mustanski, B. S., Bailey, J. M., & Kaspar, S. (2002). Dermatoglyphics, handedness, sex and sexual orientation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 113–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Plaud, J. J., & Bigwood, S. J. (1997). A multivariate analysis of sexual fantasy themes of college men. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 23, 221–230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Quinsey, V. L. (2003). The etiology of anomalous sexual preferences in men. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 105–117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rahman, Q. (2005a). The neurodevelopment of human sexual orientation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 29, 1057–1066.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rahman, Q. (2005b). Fluctuating asymmetry, 2nd to 4th finger length ratios and human sexual orientation. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30, 382–391.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rahman, Q., & Wilson, G. D. (2003). Sexual orientation and the 2nd to 4th finger length ratio: evidence for organising effects of sex hormones or developmental instability? Psychoneuroendocrinology, 28, 288–303.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Richters, J., Grulich, A. E., de Visser, R. O., Smith, A. M. A., & Rissel, C. E. (2003). Autoerotic, esoteric and other sexual practices engaged in by a representative sample of adults. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 27, 180–190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Robinson, S. J., & Manning, J. T. (2000). The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length and male homosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 333–345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sierra, J. C., Ortega, V., & Zubeidat, I. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis of a Spanish version of the Sex Fantasy Questionnaire: Assessing gender differences. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 32, 137–159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Trivers, R. L., Manning, J. T., Thornhill, R., & Singh, D. (1999). The Jamaican asymmetry project: A long-term study of fluctuating asymmetry in rural Jamaican children. Human Biology, 71, 417–430.Google Scholar
  48. Waisman, R., Fenwick, P. B. C., Wilson, G. D., Hewett, T. D., & Lumsden, J. (2003). EEG responses to visual erotic stimuli in men with normal and paraphilic interests. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilson, G. D. (1988). Measurement of sexual fantasy. Sexual and Marital Therapy, 3, 45–55.Google Scholar
  50. Wilson, G. D., & Lang, R. (1981). Sex differences in sexual fantasy patterns. Personality and Individual Differences, 2, 343–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zucker, K. J., Beaulieu, N., Bradley, S. J., Grimshaw, G. W., & Wilcox, A. (2001). Handedness in boys with gender identity disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 767–776.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary CollegeUniversity of LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Institute of PsychiatryKings College-University of LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.School of PsychologyUniversity of East LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations