Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 252–265

Factors that Influence Sexual Arousal in Men: A Focus Group Study

  • Erick Janssen
  • Kimberly R. McBride
  • William Yarber
  • Brandon J. Hill
  • Scott M. Butler
Original Paper

Abstract

The goal of this study was to improve our understanding of men’s sexual response and its components as well as the factors or types of situations that men describe as facilitating or interfering with sexual arousal. Six focus groups, involving 50 mostly white, heterosexual men (M age = 35.2 years; range, 18–70), were conducted. As it was previously found in women (Graham, Sanders, Milhausen, & McBride, Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 527–538, 2004), men described a wide range of physical (genital as well as nongenital) and cognitive/affective cues for sexual arousal. Also, men described the relationship between sexual desire and arousal as being variable and complex, presented a wide range of factors that increased or decreased sexual arousal, and showed substantial variability in both the importance and direction of their effects. The findings may help further development of models of sexual response and inform discussions about gender differences in sexual desire and arousal.

Keywords

Sexual arousal Sexual desire Sexual response models Gender Men 

References

  1. Anderson, P., & Sorenson, W. (1996). Male and female differences in reports of women’s heterosexual initiation and aggression. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28, 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bancroft, J. (1990). Man and his penis—a relationship under threat? Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 2, 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bancroft, J. (1999). Central inhibition of sexual response in the male: A theoretical perspective. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 23, 763–784.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bancroft, J., & Janssen, E. (2000). The dual control model of male sexual response: A theoretical approach to centrally mediated erectile dysfunction. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Review, 24, 571–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bancroft, J., Janssen, E., Strong, D., Carnes, L., Vukadinovic, Z., & Long, J. S. (2003). The relation between mood and sexuality in heterosexual men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 217–230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bancroft, J., Janssen, E., Strong, D., & Vukadinovic, Z. (2003). The relation between mood and sexuality in gay men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 231–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barlow, D. H. (1986). Causes of sexual dysfunction: The role of anxiety and cognitive interference. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 140–157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barlow, D. H., Becker, R., Leitenberg, H., & Agras W. (1970). A mechanical strain gauge for recording penile circumference change. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Basson, R. (2002a). Are our definitions of women’s desire, arousal and sexual pain disorder too broad and our definition of orgasmic disorder too narrow? Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 28, 289–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Basson, R. (2002b). A model of women’s sexual arousal. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 28, 1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brod, H. (1988). Pornography and the alienation of male sexuality. Social Theory and Practice, 14, 265–284.Google Scholar
  12. Buss, D. (1994). The evolution of desire. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  13. Carpenter, D., Janssen, E., Graham, C., Vorst, H., & Wicherts, J. (2007). Women’s scores on the Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Scales (SIS/SES): Gender similarities and differences. Journal of Sex Research, in press.Google Scholar
  14. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dworkin, S. L., & O’Sullivan, L. (2005). Actual versus desired initiation patterns among a sample of college men: Tapping disjunctures within traditional male sexual scripts. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 150–158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Freund, K. (1963). A laboratory method for diagnosing predominance of homo- or hetero-erotic interest in the male. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1, 85–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Graham, C., Sanders, S., & Milhausen, R. (2006). The sexual excitation/sexual inhibition inventory for women: Psychometric properties. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 397–409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Graham, C., Sanders, S., Milhausen, R., & McBride, K. (2004). Turning on and turning off: A focus group study of the factors that affect women’s sexual arousal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 527–538.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jack, A. I., & Roepstorff, A. (2002). Introspection and cognitive brain mapping: From stimulus-response to script-report. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 333–339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Janssen, E., & Bancroft, J. (2007). The dual-control model: The role of sexual inhibition and excitation in sexual arousal and behavior. In E. Janssen (Ed.), The psychophysiology of sex (pp. 197–222). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Janssen, E., Carpenter, D., & Graham, C. (2003). Selecting films for sex research: Gender differences in erotic film preference. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 243–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Janssen, E., & Everaerd, W. (1993). Determinants of male sexual arousal. Annual Review of Sex Research, 4, 211–245.Google Scholar
  23. Janssen, E., Everaerd, W., Spiering, M., & Janssen, J. (2000). Automatic processes and the appraisal of sexual stimuli: Toward an information processing model of sexual arousal. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 8–23.Google Scholar
  24. Janssen, E., Vorst, H., Finn, P., & Bancroft, J. (2002a). The sexual inhibition (sis) and sexual excitation (SES) scales: I. Measuring sexual inhibition and excitation proneness in men. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 114–126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Janssen, E., Vorst, H., Finn, P., & Bancroft, J. (2002b). The sexual inhibition (SIS) and sexual excitation (SES) scales: II. Predicting psychophysiological response patterns. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 127–132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaplan, H. S. (1977). Hypoactive sexual desire. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 3, 3–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaplan, H. S. (1979). Disorders of sexual desire. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  28. Lief, H. I. (1977). What’s new in sex research? Inhibited sexual desire. Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality, 11(7), 94–95.Google Scholar
  29. Lykins, A., Janssen, E., & Graham, C. A. (2006). The relationship between negative mood and sexuality in heterosexual college women and men. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 136–143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. (1966). Human sexual response. New York: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  31. Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Nicolson, P., & Burr, J. (2003). What is ‘normal’ about women’s (hetero)sexual desire and orgasm?: A report of an in-depth interview study. Social Science and Medicine, 57, 1735–1745.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Palace, E. M. (1995). A cognitive-physiological process model of sexual arousal and response. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2, 370–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Robinson, M. D., Johnson, J. T., & Shields, S. A. (1998). The gender heuristic and the database: Factors affecting the perception of gender-related differences in the experience and display of emotions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20, 206–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Seal, D. W., Bogart, L. M., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (1998). Small group dynamics: The utility of focus group discussions as a research method. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Seal, D. W., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (2003). Masculinity and urban men: Perceived scripts for courtship, romantic, and sexual interactions with women. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 5, 295–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sintchak, G., & Geer, J. H. (1975). A vaginal plethysmograph system. Psychophysiology, 12, 113–115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. The Working Group for a New View of Women’s Sexual Problems. (2001). A new view of women’s sexual problems. In E. Kaschak & L. Tiefer (Eds.), A new view of women’s sexual problems (pp. 1–8). New York: The Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  40. Tiefer, L. (1986). In pursuit of the perfect penis: The medicalization of male sexuality. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 579–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tiefer, L. (1991). Historical, scientific, clinical, and feminist criticisms of “The Human Sexual Response Cycle” model. Annual Review of Sex Research, 2, 1–23.Google Scholar
  42. Tiefer, L. (2001). A new view of women’s sexual problems: Why new? Why now? Journal of Sex Research, 38, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tolman, D. L., Spencer, R., Harmon, T., Rosen-Reynose, M., & Striepe, M. (2004). Getting close, staying cool: Early adolescent boys’ experiences with romantic relationships. In N. Way & J. Y. Chu (Eds.), Adolescent boys: Exploring diverse cultures of boyhood (pp. 235–255). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  44. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilkinson, S. (1999). Focus groups. A feminist method. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 221–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wilson, T. D., & Dunn, E. (2004). Self-knowledge: Its limits, value, and potential for improvement. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 493–518.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erick Janssen
    • 1
  • Kimberly R. McBride
    • 2
  • William Yarber
    • 3
  • Brandon J. Hill
    • 4
  • Scott M. Butler
    • 5
  1. 1.The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and ReproductionIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Pediatrics, Section of Adolescent MedicineIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisUSA
  3. 3.Department of Applied Health ScienceIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Gender StudiesIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  5. 5.Department of KinesiologyGeorgia College and State UniversityMilledgevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations