This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1993). Human sperm competition: Ejaculate manipulation by females and a function for the female orgasm. Animal Behaviour, 46, 887–909.
Barash, D. (2005). Let a thousand orgasms bloom! [Review of the book The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution]. Evolutionary Psychology, 3, 347–354.
Fox, C. A., Wolff, H. S., & Baker, J. A. (1970). Measurement of intra-vaginal and intra-uterine pressures during human coitus by radio-telemetry. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 22, 243–251.
Judson, O. (2005). Anticlimax [Review of the book The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution]. Nature, 436, 916–917.
Levin, R. J. (2002). The physiology of sexual arousal in the human female: A recreational and procreational synthesis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 405–411.
Lloyd, E. A. (2005). The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Puts, D. A. (2006). [Review of the book The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 103–108.
Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
About this article
Cite this article
Wallen, K. Commentary on Puts’ (2006) Review ofThe Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution . Arch Sex Behav 35, 633–636 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9100-0
- Sperm Competition
- Female Orgasm
- Adaptationist Explanation
- Photo Receptor
- Clitoral Stimulation