Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Commentary on Puts’ (2006) Review ofThe Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1993). Human sperm competition: Ejaculate manipulation by females and a function for the female orgasm. Animal Behaviour, 46, 887–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barash, D. (2005). Let a thousand orgasms bloom! [Review of the book The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution]. Evolutionary Psychology, 3, 347–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C. A., Wolff, H. S., & Baker, J. A. (1970). Measurement of intra-vaginal and intra-uterine pressures during human coitus by radio-telemetry. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 22, 243–251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Judson, O. (2005). Anticlimax [Review of the book The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution]. Nature, 436, 916–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R. J. (2002). The physiology of sexual arousal in the human female: A recreational and procreational synthesis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 405–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, E. A. (2005). The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A. (2006). [Review of the book The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 103–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, 30322, Georgia, USA

    Kim Wallen

Authors
  1. Kim Wallen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kim Wallen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wallen, K. Commentary on Puts’ (2006) Review ofThe Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution . Arch Sex Behav 35, 633–636 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9100-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9100-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation