Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 101–106

National Samples, Sexual Abuse in Childhood, and Adjustment in Adulthood: A Commentary on Najman, Dunne, Purdie, Boyle, and Coxeter (2005)

Original Paper

Abstract

This article comments on the Najman, Dunne, Purdie, Boyle, and Coxeter (2005) study on the relationship between childhood sexual abuse (CSA) and later sexual functioning in an Australian national sample. We note the value of the Najman et al. study, being well conducted and using a generalizable sample, but critique Najman et al.’s interpretation that their study showed “significant impairment” due to the CSA. We computed effect sizes to show that the “effects” were small, and then show using meta-analysis that these small effects were consistent with results in a series of national samples from other countries. We argue that Najman et al.’s causal statement about CSA’s “impairment” effect was unwarranted given their lack of causal analysis, the well-established fact in other research that CSA is often confounded with third variables, and the fact that CSA was confounded with a key third variable in Najman et al.’s study. Given the hyperbole that surrounds the issue of CSA, we emphasize the need for researchers to adhere to valid scientific principles in inference and precision when reporting the results of CSA research.

keywords

Child sexual abuse Adult sexual functioning National samples Effect size Causal inference 

References

  1. Ageton, S. (1988). Vulnerability to sexual assault. In A. W. Burgess (Ed.), Rape and sexual assault II (pp. 221–243). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  2. Bigler, M. O. (1992). Childhood sexual trauma as a predictor of adult sexual self-esteem and sexual dysfunction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
  3. Boney-McCoy, S., & Finkelhor, D. (1995). Psychosocial sequelae of violent victimization in a national youth sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 726–736.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 1304–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Finkelhor, D., Hotaling, G. T., Lewis, I. A., & Smith, C. (1989). Sexual abuse and its relationship to later sexual satisfaction, marital status, religion, and attitudes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 379–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hays, W. L. (1994). Statistics (5th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  7. Jenkins, P. (1998). Moral panic: Changing concepts of the child molester in modern America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Keith, T. Z. (2006). Multiple regression and beyond. Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  9. Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lopez, F., Carpintero, E., Hernandez, A., Martin, M., & Fuertes, A. (1995). Prevalencia y consecuencias del abuso sexual al menor en Espana [Prevalence and consequences of sexual abuse of minors in Spain]. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19, 1039–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Najman, J. M., Dunne, M. P., Purdie, D. M., Boyle, F. M., & Coxeter, P. D. (2005). Sexual abuse in childhood and sexual dysfunction in adulthood: An Australian population-based study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 517–526.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Rind, B. (2004). An empirical examination of sexual relations between adolescents and adults: They differ from those between children and adults and should be treated separately. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 16, 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rind, B., & Tromovitch, P. (1997). A meta-analytic review of findings from national samples on psychological correlates of child sexual abuse. Journal of Sex Research, 34, 237–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rind, B., Tromovitch, P., & Bauserman, R. (1998). A meta-analytic examination of the assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college samples. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 22–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rind, B., Tromovitch, E., & Bauserman, R. (2001). The validity and appropriateness of methods, analyses, and conclusions in Rind et al. (1998): A rebuttal of victimological critique from Ondersma et al. (2001) and Dallam et al. (2001). Psychological Bulletin, 127, 734–758.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.College of Liberal Arts and SciencesTokyo Medical and Dental University, BunkyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations