Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 461–471 | Cite as

Sexual Risk Behavior of HIV-Positive Methamphetamine-Using Men Who Have Sex with Men: The Role of Partner Serostatus and Partner Type

  • Shirley J. Semple
  • Jim Zians
  • Igor Grant
  • Thomas L. Patterson
Original Paper

Abstract

This study examined the role of partner serostatus and partner type in relation to the sexual risk behaviors and disclosure practices of HIV-positive methamphetamine (meth)-using men who have sex with men (MSM). The sample consisted of 132 HIV-positive meth-using MSM who reported having both serodiscordant (i.e., HIV-negative and unknown serostatus) and seroconcordant (i.e., HIV-positive) partners. HIV-positive meth-using MSM engaged in significantly fewer acts of anal sex with serodiscordant partners as compared to seroconcordant partners. However, mean levels of unprotected anal and oral sex were high, and mean levels of protected sex were low for both seroconcordant and serodiscordant partners. Oral sex was practiced twice as often as anal sex; however, both types of sex were primarily unprotected. This pattern of risky sexual behavior was reported for steady, casual, and anonymous partners, regardless of partner serostatus. Despite high rates of unprotected sex, rates of HIV serostatus disclosure were consistently high for HIV-positive and HIV-negative steady, casual, and anonymous partners. However, rates of disclosure to unknown serostatus partners were low, particularly in relation to anonymous partners. Future research should address the reasons why HIV-positive meth-using MSM engage in risky sexual activity with serodiscordant partners, and HIV prevention programs for this population should emphasize the risks associated with unprotected sex with seroconcordant partners.

Keywords

Men Homosexuality Methamphetamine Sexual behavior Risk 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Support for this work was provided, in part, by the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) R01 DA12116 (Promoting Safer Sex in HIV+ MSM Methamphetamine Users), The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) grant 1 R01 MH61146-01A2 (HIV/STD Risk and Maintenance in “At Risk” People), NIMH Center grant 2 P50 MH45294 (HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center), the Department of Veterans Affairs, and the State of California's University-wide AIDS Research Program (IS02-SD-701).

References

  1. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Garbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bucholz, K. K., Cadoret, R., Cloninger, R. D., Dinwiddie, S. H., Hesselbrock, V. M., Nurnberger, J. I., et al. (1994). A new semi-structured psychiatric interview for use in genetic linkage studies. A report on the reliability of the SSAGA. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 55, 149–158.Google Scholar
  3. Catania, J., Chitwood, D., Gibson, D., & Coates, T. (1990). Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: Influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 339–362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fisher, J. D., Kimble Willcutts D. L., Misovich, S. J., & Weinstein, B. (1998). Dynamics of sexual risk behavior in HIV-infected men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior, 2, 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Frosch, D., Shoptaw, S., Huber, A., Rawson, R. A., & Ling, W. (1996). Sexual HIV risk among gay and bisexual male methamphetamine users. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 13, 483–486.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gorman, E. M., Morgan, P., & Lambert, E. Y. (1995). Qualitative research considerations and other issues in the study of methamphetamine use among men who have sex with men. In E. Lambert, R. Ashery, & R. Needle (Eds.), Qualitative methods in drug abuse and HIV research (pp. 156–181). Rockville, MD: NIDA.Google Scholar
  7. Heller, D., McCoy, K., & Cunningham, C. (2004). An invisible barrier to integrating HIV primary care with harm reduction services: Philosophical clashes between the harm reduction and medical models. Public Health Reports, 119, 32–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kalichman, S. C., Kelly, J. A., & Rompa, D. (1997). Continued high-risk sex among HIV seropositive gay and bisexual men seeking HIV prevention services. Health Psychology, 16, 369–373.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kalichman, S. C., Rompa, D., Luke, W., & Austin, J. (2002). HIV transmission risk behaviours among HIV-positive persons in serodiscordant relationships. International Journal of STD & AIDS, 13, 677–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Marks, G., & Crepaz, N. (2001). HIV-positive men's sexual practices in the context of self-disclosure in HIV status. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 27, 79–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Marks, G., Ruiz, M. S., Richardson, J., Reed, D., Mason, H., Sotelo, M., et al. (1994). Anal intercourse and disclosure of HIV infection among seropositive gay and bisexual men. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 7, 866–869.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Molitor, F., Truax, S. R., Ruiz, J. D., & Sun, R. K. (1998). Association of methamphetamine during sex with risky sexual behaviors and HIV infection among non-injection drug users. Western Journal of Medicine, 168, 93–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Reback, C. J. (1997). The social construction of a gay drug: Methamphetamine use among gay and bisexual males in Los Angeles (Report #93427). City of Los Angeles AIDS Coordinator.Google Scholar
  14. Semple, S. J., Patterson, T. L., & Grant, I. (2002). Motivations associated with methamphetamine use among HIV+ men who have sex with men. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22, 149–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Semple, S. J., Patterson, T. L., & Grant, I. (2003). HIV-positive gay and bisexual men: Predictors of unsafe sex. AIDS Care, 15, 3–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Semple, S. J., Patterson, T. L., & Grant, I. (2004). Psychosocial characteristics and sexual risk behavior of HIV+ men who have anonymous sex partners. Psychology and Health, 18, 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shoptaw, S., Peck, J., Reback, C. J., & Rotheram-Fuller, E. (2003). Psychiatric and substance dependence comorbidities, sexually transmitted diseases, and risk behaviors among methamphetamine-dependent gay and bisexual men seeking outpatient drug abuse treatment. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, SARC Suppl., 1, 161–168.Google Scholar
  18. Shoptaw, S., Reback, C. J., & Freese, T. E. (2002). Patient characteristics, HIV serostatus, and risk behaviors among gay and bisexual males seeking treatment for methamphetamine abuse and dependence in Los Angeles. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 21, 91–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stall, R., Paul, J. P., Greenwood, G., Pollack, L. M., Bein, E., Crosby, G. M., et al. (2001). Alcohol use, drug use and alcohol-related problems among men who have sex with men: The Urban Men's Health Study. Addiction, 96, 1589–1601.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Suarez, T. P., Kelly, K. A., Pinkerton, S. D., Stevenson, Y. L., Hayat, M., Smith, M. D., et al. (2001). Influence of a partner's HIV serostatus, use of highly active antiretroviral therapy, and viral load on perceptions of sexual risk behavior in a community sample of men who have sex with men. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 28, 471–477.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Zians, J., Houke, C., & D'Hont, M. (2004). Project SMART: Results of a social marketing campaign that used harm reduction principles to address methamphetamine abuse among gay and bisexual men in San Diego County. San Diego, CA: Stepping Stone, Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shirley J. Semple
    • 1
  • Jim Zians
    • 1
  • Igor Grant
    • 1
    • 2
  • Thomas L. Patterson
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Veterans Affairs Medical CenterSan Diego, La JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations