Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 129–142 | Cite as

To Be Seen and Not Heard: Femininity Ideology and Adolescent Girls’ Sexual Health

  • Emily A. Impett
  • Deborah Schooler
  • Deborah L. Tolman
Article

This study used a feminist developmental framework to test the hypothesis that internalizing conventional ideas about femininity in two domains—inauthenticity in relationships and body objectification—is associated with diminished sexual health among adolescent girls. In this study, sexual health was conceptualized as feelings of sexual self-efficacy (i.e., a girl's conviction that she can act upon her own sexual needs in a relationship) and protection behavior (i.e., from both STIs and unwanted pregnancy). A total of 116 girls (aged 16–19) completed measures of femininity ideology, sexual self-efficacy, sexual experiences, and protection behavior. Results revealed that inauthenticity in relationships and body objectification were associated with poorer sexual self-efficacy and sexual self-efficacy, in turn, predicted less sexual experience and less use of protection. Further, the two components of femininity ideology were associated with different forms of protection. The importance of a feminist developmental framework for identifying and understanding salient dimensions of sexual health for female adolescents is discussed.

KEY WORDS:

adolescent girls femininity ideology sexual health sexual risk taking sexual self-efficacy 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by postdoctoral fellowships awarded to Emily A. Impett and Deborah Schooler from the Center for Research on Gender and Sexuality and by grants from the National Institute of Child Health and Development (Grant No. R29 HD33281-02) and the Ford Foundation awarded to Deborah L. Tolman. The authors would like to thank Celeste Hirschman, Janna Kim, Alice Michael, and Lynn Sorsoli for helpful comments on an earlier draft.

REFERENCES

  1. Alan Guttmacher Institute (1999). Teenage pregnancy: Overall trends and state-by-state information. New York: AGI.Google Scholar
  2. Amaro, H. (1995). Love, sex, and power: Considering women's realities in HIV prevention. American Psychologist, 50, 437–447.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Bordo, S. (1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture, and the body. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, L. M. (1998). Raising their voices: The politics of girls’ anger. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, L. M., & Gilligan, C. (1992). Meeting at the crossroads: Women's psychology and girls’ development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Brumberg, J. J. (1997). The body project: An intimate history of American girls. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  12. Carver, K., Joyner, K., & Udry, J. R. (2003). National estimates of adolescent romantic relationships. In P. Florsheim (Ed.), Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior (pp. 23–56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  13. Catania, J. A., Gibson, D. R., Chitwood, D. D., & Coates, T. J. (1990). Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: Influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 339–362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. CDC. (2003a). STD surveillance 2003. Retrieved July 19, 2005, from http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats/adol.htm.Google Scholar
  15. CDC. (2003b). HIV/AIDS surveillance in adolescents. Retrieved July 19, 2005, from http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/graphics/adolesnt.htm.Google Scholar
  16. Christopher, F. S. (2001). To dance the dance: A symbolic interactional exploration of premarital sexuality. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  17. Chu, J. Y., Porche, M. V., & Tolman, D. L. (2005). The Adolescent Masculinity Ideology in Relationships Scale: Development and validation of a new measure for boys. Men and Masculinities, 8, 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crosby, R. A., Holtgrave, D. R., DiClemente, R. J., Wingood, G. M., & Gayle, J. A. (2003). Social capital as a predictor of adolescents’ sexual risk behavior: A state-level exploratory study. AIDS and Behavior, 7, 245–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davis, K. R., & Weller, S. G. (1999). The effectiveness of condoms in reducing heterosexual transmission of HIV. Family Planning Perspectives, 31, 272–279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. de Beauvoir, S. (1961). The second sex. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  22. Dove, N. L., & Wiederman, M. W. (2000). Cognitive distraction and women's sexual functioning. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 67–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ehrhardt, A. A. (1996). Our view of adolescent sexuality: A focus on risk behavior without the developmental context [Editorial]. American Journal of Public Health, 86, 1523–1525.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Entwisle, D. R., & Astone, N. M. (1994). Some practical guidelines for measuring youth's race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Child Development, 65, 1521–1540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Erikson, E. (1968). Identity, youth and crisis. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  26. Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 357–411). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  27. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Goldman, J. A., & Harlow, L. L. (1993). Self-perception variables that mediate AIDS-preventive behavior in college students. Health Psychology, 12, 489–498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gómez, C. A., & Marín, B. V. (1996). Gender, culture, and power: Barriers to HIV prevention strategies for women. Journal of Sex Research, 33, 355–362.Google Scholar
  31. Harter, S., Waters, P. L., & Whitesell, N. R. (1997). Lack of voice as a manifestation of false self-behavior among adolescents: The school setting as a stage upon which the drama of authenticity is enacted. Educational Psychologist, 32, 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hearn, K. D., O’Sullivan, L. F., & Dudley, C. D. (2003). Assessing reliability of early adolescent girls’ reports of romantic and sexual behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 513–521.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Henshaw, S. K. (1998). Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Family Planning Perspectives, 30, 24–29, 46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (1998). The male in the head: Young people, heterosexuality, and power. London: Tufnell Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2003). Sexual compliance: Gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 87–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Impett, E. A., Peplau, L. A., & Gable, S. L. (2005). Approach and avoidance sexual motivation: Implications for personal and interpersonal well-being. Personal Relationships, 12, 465–482.Google Scholar
  38. Jack, D. C., & Dill, D. (1992). The silencing the self scale: Schemas of intimacy associated with depression in women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jagger, A. M. (1983). Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
  40. Jordan, J. V., Kaplan, A. G., Miller, J. B., Stiver, I. P., & Surrey, J. L. (1991). Women's growth in connection: Writings from the Stone Center. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  41. Kauth, M. R., St. Lawrence, J. S., & Kelly, J. A. (1991). Reliability of retrospective assessments of sexual HIV risk behavior: A comparison of biweekly, three-month, and twelve-month self-reports. AIDS Education and Prevention, 3, 207–214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  43. Levinson, R. A. (1986). Contraceptive self-efficacy: A perspective on teenage girls’ contraceptive behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 22, 347–369.Google Scholar
  44. Manlove, J., Ryan, S., & Franzetta, K. (2003). Patterns of contraceptive use within teenagers’ first sexual relationships. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 35, 246–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McCree, D. H., Wingood, G. M., DiClemente, R., Davies, S., & Harrington, K. F. (2003). Religiosity and risky sexual behavior in African-American adolescent females. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33, 2–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parsons, J. T., Halkitis, P. N., Bimbi, D., & Borkowski, T. (2000). Perceptions of the benefits and costs associated with condom use and unprotected sex among late adolescent college students. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 377–391.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Peplau, L. A., Hill, C. T., & Rubin, Z. (1993). Sex-role attitudes in dating and marriage: A 15-year follow-up of the Boston Couples Study. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 31–52.Google Scholar
  49. Pleck, J. H., Sonenstein, F. L., & Ku, L. C. (1993). Masculinity ideology: Its impact on adolescent males’ heterosexual relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 11–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Quina, K., Harlow, L. L., Morokoff, P. J., Burkholder, G., & Deiter, P. J. (2000). Sexual communication in relationships: When words speak louder than actions. Sex Roles, 42, 523–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reisen, C. A., & Poppen, P. J. (1995). College women and condom use: Importance of partner relationship. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1485–1498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rosenthal, D. A., & Shepherd, H. (1993). A six-month follow-up of adolescents’ sexual risk-taking, HIV/AIDS knowledge, and attitudes to condoms. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 3, 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schooler, D., & Ward, L. M., Merriwether, A., & Caruthers, A. (2005). Cycles of shame: Menstrual shame, body shame, and sexual decision-making. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 324–334.Google Scholar
  54. SIECUS. (1995). Consensus statement from the National Commission on Adolescent Sexual Health. New York: SIECUS.Google Scholar
  55. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  56. Tolman, D. L. (1999). Femininity as a barrier to positive sexual health for adolescent girls. Journal of the American Medical Women's Association, 54, 133–138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Tolman, D. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Tolman, D. L., & Debold, E. (1993). Conflicts of body and image: Female adolescents, desire, and the no-body body. In P. Fallon, M. Katzman, & S. Wooley (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on eating disorders (pp. 301–317). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  59. Tolman, D. L., Impett, E. A., Tracy, A. J., & Michael, A. (in press). Looking good, sounding good: Femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ mental health. Psychology of Women Quarterly.Google Scholar
  60. Tolman, D. L., & Porche, M. V. (2000). The Adolescent Femininity Ideology Scale: Development and validation of a new measure for girls. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 365–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tolman, D. L., Spencer, R., Harmon, T., Rosen-Reynoso, M., & Striepe, M. (2004). Getting close, staying cool: Early adolescent boys’ experiences with romantic relationships. In N. Way & J. Y. Chu (Eds.), Adolescent boys: Exploring diverse cultures of boyhood (pp. 236–255). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Tolman, D. L., Spencer, R., Rosen-Reynoso, M., & Porche, M. (2003). Sowing the seeds of violence in heterosexual relationships: Early adolescents narrate compulsory heterosexuality. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tolman, D. L., Striepe, M. I., & Harmon, T. (2003). Gender matters: Constructing a model of adolescent sexual health. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 4–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Walsh, T. L., Frezieres, R. G., Peacock, K., Nelson, A. L., Clark, V. A., Berstein, L., et al. (2004). Effectiveness of the male latex condom: Combined results for three popular condom brands used as controls in randomized clinical trials. Contraception, 70, 407–413.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wiederman, M. W. (2000). Women's body image self-consciousness during physical intimacy with a partner. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 60–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wingood, G. M., & DiClemente, R. J. (1998). Partner influences and gender-related factors associated with noncondom use among young adult African American women. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 29–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wingood, G. M., DiClemente, R. J., Harrington, K., & Davies, S. (2002). Body image and African American females’ sexual health. Journal of Women's Health and Gender-Based Medicine, 11, 433–439.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emily A. Impett
    • 1
    • 2
  • Deborah Schooler
    • 1
  • Deborah L. Tolman
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Research on Gender and SexualitySan Francisco State UniversitySan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Center for Research on Gender and SexualitySan Francisco State UniversitySan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations