An Empirical Test of the Kin Selection Hypothesis for Male Homosexuality
The current investigation, following Bobrow and Bailey (2001), aimed to test the kin selection theory of homosexuality in human males using a survey design. A total of 60 heterosexual and 60 homosexual men from England completed items measuring psychological and behavioral indices of “special design” as predicted by adaptation due to kin selection. There were no significant differences between heterosexual and homosexual men in general familial affinity, generous feelings (willingness to provide financial and emotional resources), and benevolent tendencies (such as willingness to baby-sit). These remained non-significant after co-varying for level of personal income (higher among homosexual men), psychological gender, and interest in children. Overall, little support was found for the kin selection theory in a community sample.
Key Wordshomosexuality men sexual orientation kin selection: evolution
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bailey, J. M. (2003). The man who would be queen. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
- Bell, A. P., & Weinberg, M. (1978). Homosexualities: A study of diversity among men and women. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
- Buss, D. (1994). The evolution of desire: Strategies in human mating. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Dickemann, M. (1995). Wilson’s panchreston: the inclusive fitness hypothesis of sociobiology re-examined. In J. P. DeCecco & D. A. Parker (Eds.), Sex, cells, and same-sex desire: The biology of sexual preference (pp. 147–183). New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
- Eysenck, H. J., Wilson, G. D., & Jackson, C. (1996). Eysenck personality profiler. Croydon, Surrey: PSI Press.Google Scholar
- Hamer, D., & Copeland, P. (1994). The science of desire: The search for the gay gene and the biology of behavior. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
- Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
- McKnight, J. (1997). Straight science? Homosexuality, evolution and adaptation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Saghir, M. T., & Robins, E. (1973). Male and female homosexuality: A comprehensive investigation. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
- Weinrich, J. D. (1976). Human reproductive strategy: II. Homosexuality and non-reproductive strategy: Some evolutionary models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
- Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
- Wilson, E. O. (1978). On human nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar