Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 241–253 | Cite as

Behavioral Characteristics of Men Accused of Rape: Evidence for Different Types of Rapists

Article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether the behavioral characteristics demonstrated by rapists clustered together into groups that were similar to the common rapist typology in the literature: anger, power exploitative, power reassurance, and sadistic. Two studies were conducted to examine the evidence for this typology. Study 1 involved the analysis of data from 130 men charged with sexual assault and Study 2 involved the analysis of court transcripts from 50 rape cases tried through the court system. The results of Study 1 revealed that there was some validity to the characteristics usually associated with each of the four types of rape, especially for the power reassurance and sadistic rapists. However, there were some unexpected outliers within both the anger and power exploitative types of rapists, which may suggest that there is more than one type of anger rapist and more than two types of power rapists. The results of Study 2 very closely replicated the results of Study 1. Future research needs to focus on the behavioral, motivational, and cognitive characteristics associated with each of the types of rapists and research them separately, so that it is possible to further evaluate the evidence for the typology identified in this study.

Keywords

typology rape rapists sexual assault 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barbaree, H. E., Seto, M. C., Serin, R., Amos, N., & Preston, D. (1994). Comparisons between sexual and nonsexual rapist subtypes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 95–114.Google Scholar
  2. Canter, D., & Heritage, R. (1990). A multivariate model of sexual offence behavior: Developments in offender profiling. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 1, 185–212.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, M., Seghorn, T., & Calmas, W. (1969). Sociometric study of sex offenders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74, 249–255.Google Scholar
  4. Crimes Act. (1956). Act No. 6231 of 1956. Melbourne, Victoria: Government Printer of Victoria.Google Scholar
  5. Crimes Act. (1991). Act No. 81/1991, New Subdivision 8A to 8G under section 35. Melbourne, Victoria: Government Printer of Victoria.Google Scholar
  6. Darke, J. (1990). Sexual aggression: Achieving power through humiliation. In W. Marshall, D. Laws, & H. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 55–72). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  7. Douglas, J., & Olshaker, M. (1998). Obsession. Sydney: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
  8. Gebhard, P., Gagnon, J., Pomeroy, W., & Christenson, C. (1965). Sex offenders: Analysis of types. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  9. Groth, A. N. (1979). Men who rape: The psychology of the offender. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  10. Groth, A. N., Burgess, A. W., & Holmstrom, L. L. (1977). Rape: Power, anger, and sexuality. American Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 1239–1243.Google Scholar
  11. Guttmacher, M., & Weihofen, H. (1952). Psychiatry and the law. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  12. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. C., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Hazelwood, R., & Burgess, A. (1987). Practical aspects of rape investigation: A multidisciplinary approach. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  14. Holmstrom, L. L., & Burgess, A. W. (1980). Sexual behavior of assailants during reported rapes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 9, 427–439.Google Scholar
  15. Knight, R., & Prentky, R. (1990).Classifying sexual offenders: The development and corroboration of taxonomic models. In W. Marshall, D. Laws, & H. Barbaree (Eds.), The handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 23–52). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  16. Knight, R. A., Prentky, R. A., Schneider, B., & Rosenberg, R. (1983). Classification of sexual offenders: Perspectives, methods and validation. In A. Burgess (Ed.), Rape and sexual assault: A research handbook (pp. 222–293). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  17. Kopp, S. (1962). The character structure of sex offenders. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 16, 64–70.Google Scholar
  18. Polaschek, D., Ward, T., & Hudson, S. (1997). Rape and rapists: Theory and treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 117–144.Google Scholar
  19. Prentky, R. A., & Knight, R. A. (1991). Identifying critical dimensions for discriminating among rapists. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 643–661.Google Scholar
  20. Rada, R. (1978). Clinical aspects of the rapist. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  21. Scully, D., & Marolla, J. (1985). “Riding the bull at Gilley’s”: Convicted rapists describe the rewards of rape. Social Problems, 32, 251–263.Google Scholar
  22. Seghorn, T., & Cohen, M. (1980). The psychology of the rape assailant. In W. Curran, A. McGarry, & C. Petty (Eds.), Modern legal medicine, psychiatry, and forensic science (pp. 320–344). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.Google Scholar
  23. Yourell, A., & McCabe, M. P. (1988). The motivations underlying male rape of women. Australian Journal of Sex, Marriage and the Family, 9, 215–224.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyDeakin UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.School of Psychology, Deakin UniversityBurwood, VictoriaAustralia

Personalised recommendations