Advertisement

Artificial Intelligence and Law

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 301–321 | Cite as

An ontology of physical causation as a basis for assessing causation in fact and attributing legal responsibility

  • Jos LehmannEmail author
  • Aldo Gangemi
Original Paper

Abstract

Computational machineries dedicated to the attribution of legal responsibility should be based on (or, make use of) a stack of definitions relating the notion of legal responsibility to a number of suitably chosen causal notions. This paper presents a general analysis of legal responsibility and of causation in fact based on Hart and Honoré’s work. Some physical aspects of causation in fact are then treated within the “lite” version of DOLCE foundational ontology written in OWL-DL, a standard description logic for the Semantic Web.

Keywords

causation in fact formal ontology legal responsibility physical causation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader F., Calvanese D., McGuinness D., Nardi D., Patel-Schneider P., (eds) (2002) Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge UP: CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Benjamins V., Casanovas P., Breuker J., Gangemi A., (eds) (2005) Law and the Semantic Web. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  3. Bottazzi, E., Catenacci, C., Gangemi, A., and Lehmann, J. (2006). From Collective Intentionality to Intentional Collectives: An Ontological Perspective (to appear). Cognitive Systems Research – Special Issue on Cognition and Collective Intentionality Google Scholar
  4. Gangemi, A. and Mika, P. (2003). Understanding the Semantic Web through Descriptions and Situations. Proceedings of International Conference on Ontologies, Databases and Applications of SEmantics (ODBASE 2003), Catania, (Italy), November 3–7, 2003Google Scholar
  5. Gangemi A., Sagri M., Tiscornia D. (2005) A Constructive Framework for Legal Ontologies. In Benjamins, V. R., et al. (eds) Law and the Semantic Web, LNCS 3369. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 97–124Google Scholar
  6. Hart H., Honore T. (1985) Causation in the Law. Oxford University Press: OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoekstra, R. and Breuker, J. (2005). Processes as Causal Glue in a Framework for Ontology-based Re-sponsibility Attribution. In J. Lehmann, M. A. Biasiotti, E. Francesconi, E. and Sagri, M. T. (eds.), Proceedings of LOAIT Workshop – Legal Ontologies and Artificial Intelligence Techniques, ISBN 90-5850-504-9, ISSN 1871-1235, in IAAIL Workshop Series WOLF Legal Publisher, Nijmegen, 2005Google Scholar
  8. Hoekstra, R. and Breuker, J. (2006). Commonsense Causal Explanation in a Legal Domain. In This volume Google Scholar
  9. Lehmann, J. (2003). Causation in Artificial Intelligence and Law – A Modelling Approach. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, Faculty of Law, Department of Computer Science and LawGoogle Scholar
  10. Lehmann, J., Borgo, S., Masolo, C., and Gangemi, A. (2004). Causality and Causation in Dolce. In Varzi, A. C. and Vieu L. (eds.), Formal Ontology in Information Systems, Proceedings of the International Conference FOIS 2004, Torino, November 4-6, 2004, IOS Press AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  11. Lehmann J., Breuker J., Brouwer B. (2005) Causationt: Modeling causation in ai & law. Benjamins V. R., et al. (eds) Law and the Semantic Web, LNCS 3369. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 77–96Google Scholar
  12. Masolo, C., Vieu, L., Bottazzi, E., Catenacci, C., Ferrario, R., Gangemi, A., and Guarino, N. (2004). Social roles and their descriptions. In Welty and Dubois (eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR).Google Scholar
  13. McGuinness, D. and van Harmelen, F., (eds.), (2004). Owl Web Ontology Language Overview, W3C Recommendation. http://www.w3c.org/TR/owl-features/
  14. Pearl J. (2000) Causality. Cambridge University Press: CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory for Applied Ontology, Institute of Cognitive Science and TechnologyItalian National Research CouncilRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations