Artificial Intelligence and Law

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 379–396

Using NLP Techniques to Identify Legal Ontology Components: Concepts and Relations

Article

Abstract

A method to identify ontology components is presented in this article. The method relies on Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to extract concepts and relations among these concepts. This method is applied in the legal field to build an ontology dedicated to information retrieval. Legal texts on which the method is performed are carefully chosen as describing and conceptualizing the legal domain. We suggest that this method can help legal ontology designers and may be used while building ontologies dedicated to other tasks than information retrieval.

Keywords

ontology natural language processing techniques 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aussenac-Gilles, N., Biébow, B. and Szulman, S. (2000). Revisiting Ontology Design : A Method Based on Corpus Analysis. In Proceedings of Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Methods, Models and Tools, Juan-les-Pins, France, 172–188, October 2000Google Scholar
  2. Bench-Capon, T. (2001). Task Neutral Ontologies, Common Sense Ontologies and Legal Information Systems. In Second International Workshop on Legal Ontologies, JURIX 2001, Amsterdam, Netherlands, December 2001Google Scholar
  3. Bourigault, D. (2002). Analyse distributionnelle étendue. In Proceedings of Traitement Automatique des Langues, Nancy, France, June 2002Google Scholar
  4. Bourigault, D. and Lame, G. (2002). Analyse distributionnelle et structuration de terminologie, application à la construction d’une ontologie documentaire du droit. Traitement automatique des langues, Ed. Hermès, Paris, France, 129–150, Vol. 43, no. 1Google Scholar
  5. Braibant, G. (1999). La problématique de la codification. Savoir Innover en Droit. Concepts, Outils, Systèmes. Ed. La documentation française, 55–65Google Scholar
  6. Breukers, J. and Muntjewerff, A. (1999). Ontological Modelling for Designing Educational Systems. In Proceedings of Workshop on Ontologies for Intelligent Educational Systems, Le Mans, FranceGoogle Scholar
  7. Fernandez, M., Gomez-Perez, A. and Juristo, N. (1997). Methontology: From Ontological Art Towards Ontological Engineering. In Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium Series on Ontological Engineering, Stanford, USA, 33–40Google Scholar
  8. Gangemi, A., Pisanelli, D., Steve, G. 1999An Overview of the ONIONS Project : Applying Ontologies to the Integration of Medical TerminologiesData and Knowledge Engineering31183220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gauch, S., Wank, J., Rachakonda, S. 1999A Corpus Analysis Approach for Automatic Query Expansion and Its Extension to Multiple DatabasesACM Transactions on Information Systems17250269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gruningen, M. and Fox, M. (1995). Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies. In Proceedings of IJCAI Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, Montreal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  11. Holsapple, C., Joshi, K. 2002A collaborative Approach to Ontology designCommunications of the ACM454247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones D., Bench-Capon, T. and Visser, P. (1998). Methodologies for Ontology Development. In Proceedings of IT-KNOWS Conference, XV IFIP World Computer Congress, Budapest, Hungaria, August 1998Google Scholar
  13. Lame, G. (2001). Constructing an IR-oriented Legal Ontology. In Second International Workshop on Legal Ontologies, JURIX 2001, Amsterdam, Neederlands, December 2001Google Scholar
  14. Lame, G. (2002). Construction d’ontologie à partir de textes. Une ontologie de droit dédiée à la recherche d’information sur le Web. PhD dissertation, Ecole des mines de Paris, Paris France, December 2002 (http://www.cri.ensmp.fr/)
  15. Moens, M.-F. (2000). Automatic Indexing and Abstracting of Document Texts, KluwerGoogle Scholar
  16. Mommers, L. (2001). A Knowledge-Based Ontology of the Legal Domain. In Second International Workshop on Legal Ontologies, JURIX 2001, Amsterdam, Neederlands, December 2001Google Scholar
  17. Spark-Jones, K. 1973Index Term WeightingInformation Storage and Retrieval9619633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stuckenschmidt, H., Stubkjaer, E. and Schleider, C. (2001). Modeling Land Transactions : Legal Ontologies in Context. In Second International Workshop on Legal Ontologies, JURIX 2001, Amsterdam, Neederlands, December 2001Google Scholar
  19. Uschold, M. (1996). Building Ontologies: Towards a Unified Methodology. In Proceedings of Expert System, Conference of the British Computer Society Specialist Group on Expert Systems, Cambridge, England, December 1996Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre de recherche en informatique, Ecole des mines de ParisFontainebleauFrance

Personalised recommendations