Advertisement

Argumentation

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 243–253 | Cite as

Critical Inquiry: Considering the Context

  • Mark Battersby
  • Sharon Bailin
Article

Abstract

In this paper we discuss the relevance of considering context for critical thinking. We argue that critical thinking is best viewed in terms of ‘critical inquiry’ in which argumentation is seen as a way of arriving at reasoned judgments on complex issues. This is a dialectical process involving the comparative weighing of a variety of contending positions and arguments. Using the model which we have developed for teaching critical thinking as critical inquiry, we demonstrate the role played by the following aspects of context: (1) knowledge of the dialectical context (the debate around an issue, both current and historical); (2) an understanding of the current state of practice and belief surrounding an issue; (3) an understanding of the intellectual, political, historical and social contexts in which an issue is embedded; (4) knowledge of the relevant disciplinary context; (5) information about the sources of an argument; (6) awareness of one’s own beliefs and biases.

Keywords

Critical thinking Inquiry Context Reasoned judgments Dialectical 

References

  1. Ariely, D. 2010. Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  2. Bailin, S., and M. Battersby. 2010. Reason in the balance: An inquiry approach to critical thinking. Whitby, Ont.: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
  3. Bailin, S., and M. Battersby. 2009. Inquiry: A dialectical approach to teaching critical thinking. In Argument cultures, CD-ROM, ed. H.V. Hansen, et al. Windsor, ON: OSSA.Google Scholar
  4. Battersby, M., and S. Bailin. 2010. Guidelines for reaching a reasoned judgment. University of Windsor: Presented at Symposium on Conductive Argumentation.Google Scholar
  5. Johnson, R.H., and J.A. Blair. 2006. Logical self defense. New York: International Debate Education Association.Google Scholar
  6. Taubes, Gary. 2007. Good calories, bad calories. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  7. Bonnie, Richard J., and Charles H. Whitebread II. 1970. The forbidden fruit and the tree of knowledge: An inquiry into the legal history of American marijuana prohibition. Virginia Law Review 56: 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Shermer, M. (2008). Five fallacies of grief: Debunking psychological stages. Scientific American. Accessed 20 March 2008 at http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=five-fallacies-of-grief.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Capilano UniversityVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Simon Fraser UniversityVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations