, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 261–270 | Cite as

Frans H. van Eemeren: Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation

John Benjamins Publishing Company, Argumentation in Context (AIC), Vol. 2, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 2010, XII + 308 pp


  1. Andone, C. 2009. Accusing someone of an inconsistency as a confrontational way of strategic maneuvering. In Examining argumentation in context: Fifteen studies in strategic maneuvering, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, 153–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  2. Crosswhite, J. 1996. The rhetoric of reason. Writing and the attractions of argument. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dascal, M., and A.G. Gross. 1999. The marriage of pragmatics and rhetoric. Philosophy and Rhetoric 32(2): 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Greco Morasso, S. 2009. Argumentative and other communicative strategies of the mediation practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation of the University of Lugano, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  5. Hamblin, C.L. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  6. Jacobs, S. 2000. Rhetoric and dialectic from the standpoint of normative pragmatics. Argumentation 14(3): 261–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Krabbe, E.C.W. 2003. Metadialogues. In Anyone who has a view. Theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, et al., 83–90. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  8. Lorenzen, P., and K. Lorenz. 1978. Dialogische Logik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  9. Lumer, C. 2010. Pragma-dialectics and the function of argumentation. Argumentation 24: 41–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rigotti, E., and A. Rocci. 2006. Towards a definition of communication context. Foundations of an interdisciplinary approach to communication. Studies in Communication Sciences 6(2): 155–180.Google Scholar
  11. Ross, W.D. (ed.). 1959. Aristotelis Ars Rhetorica. Oxonii: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Schumpeter, J.A. 1950. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York, NY: Harper.Google Scholar
  13. Tindale, C.W. 2004. Rhetorical argumentation. Principles of theory and practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. van Eemeren, F.H., and P. Houtlosser. 2000. Rhetorical analysis within a pragma-dialectical framework. The case of R. J. Reynolds. Argumentation 14(3): 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. van Eemeren, F.H., and P. Houtlosser. 2002. Strategic maneuvering in an argumentative discourse: Maintaining a delicate balance. In Dialectic and Rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentative analysis, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, and P. Houtlosser, 131–159. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  16. Walton, D.N. 1998. The new dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  17. Walton, D.N., and E.C.W. Krabbe. 1995. Commitments in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.USI - University of LuganoLuganoSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations