Argumentation

, 22:469 | Cite as

Comments on ‘Strategic Maneuvering in Mathematical Proofs’

Article
  • 66 Downloads

References

  1. Gigerenzer, G., P.M. Todd, and The ABC Research Group. 1999. Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Jackson, S. 1996. Fallacies and heuristics. In Logic and argumentation, ed. J. van Benthem, F.H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, and F. Veltman, 101–114. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy.Google Scholar
  3. Jackson, S. 2002. Designing argumentation protocols for the classroom. In Advances in pragma-dialectics, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, 105–119. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar
  4. Jackson, S., and S. Wolski. 2001. Identification of and adaptation to students’ preinstructional beliefs in introductory communication research methods: Contributions of interactive web technology. Communication Education 50: 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jacobs, S., and S. Jackson. 1983. Speech act structure in conversation: Rational aspects of pragmatic coherence. In Conversational coherence: Form, structure, and strategy, ed. R.T. Craig and K. Tracy, 47-66. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Krabbe, E.C.W. 2007. Strategic maneuvering in mathematical proofs. Paper presented at the Amsterdam NWO conference on ‘Strategic Maneuvering in Institutionalized Contexts’, October, Diemen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  7. Pólya, G. 1954a. Mathematics and plausible reasoning, Vol. 1: Induction and analogy in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Pólya, G. 1954b. Mathematics and plausible reasoning, Vol. 2: Patterns of plausible inference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CommunicationUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations