Argumentation

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 423–432

Arguing ‘for’ the Patient: Informed Consent and Strategic Maneuvering in Doctor–Patient Interaction

Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10503-008-9086-y

Cite this article as:
Schulz, P.J. & Rubinelli, S. Argumentation (2008) 22: 423. doi:10.1007/s10503-008-9086-y

Abstract

As a way to advance integration between traditional readings of the medical encounter and argumentation theory, this article conceptualizes the doctor–patient interaction as a form of info-suasive dialogue. Firstly, the article explores the relevance of argumentation in the medical encounter in connection with the process of informed consent. Secondly, it discloses the risks inherent to a lack of reconciliation of the dialectical and rhetorical components in the delivery of the doctor’s advice, as especially resulting from the less than ideal conditions of the internal states of the doctor and the patient, and the lack of symmetry in their status.

Keywords

Medical encounter Info-suasive dialogue Informed consent Strategic maneuvering Pragma-dialectical rules of critical discussion 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Communication & HealthUniversity of Lugano (CH)LuganoSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations