Advertisement

Argumentation

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 205–208 | Cite as

Metadialogues: Krabbe’s Immanent Dialectic

  • Peter HoutlosserEmail author
  • Jan Albert van  Laar
Article

Keywords

Conversational Context Argumentative Discourse Historical Sense Inaugural Address Discussion Move 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barth E. M. and E. C. W. Krabbe: 1982, From Axiom to Dialogue : A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation, de Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  2. Eemeren F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1984, Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions Directed Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion, Foris Publications, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  3. Eemeren F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies, Lawrence Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  4. van Eemeren F. H. and P. Houtlosser: 2002, Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse: A Delicate Balance’, in F. H. van Eemeren and P. Houtlosser (eds.), Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 131–159Google Scholar
  5. Hamblin C. L.: 1970, Fallacies, Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Krabbe, E. C. W.: 1996, Wat is eigenlijk een drogreden? [What Exactly is a Fallacy?] (inaugural address, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen)Google Scholar
  7. Krabbe E. C. W.: 2003, Metadialogues, in F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, Ch. A. Willard and A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 83–90Google Scholar
  8. Lorenzen P. and K. Lorenz: 1978, Dialogische Logik, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
  9. Mackenzie J.: 1990, Four Dialogue Systems, Studia Logica 49, 567–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Walton D. N.: 1995, A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy, University of Alabama Press, TuscaloosaGoogle Scholar
  11. Walton D. N.: 1998, The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument, University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  12. Walton D. N. and E. C. W. Krabbe: 1995, Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning, State University of New York Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory and RhetoricUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Theoretical PhilosophyUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations