Argumentation

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 205–208

Metadialogues: Krabbe’s Immanent Dialectic

Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barth E. M. and E. C. W. Krabbe: 1982, From Axiom to Dialogue : A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation, de Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  2. Eemeren F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1984, Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions Directed Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion, Foris Publications, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  3. Eemeren F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies, Lawrence Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  4. van Eemeren F. H. and P. Houtlosser: 2002, Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse: A Delicate Balance’, in F. H. van Eemeren and P. Houtlosser (eds.), Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 131–159Google Scholar
  5. Hamblin C. L.: 1970, Fallacies, Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Krabbe, E. C. W.: 1996, Wat is eigenlijk een drogreden? [What Exactly is a Fallacy?] (inaugural address, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen)Google Scholar
  7. Krabbe E. C. W.: 2003, Metadialogues, in F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, Ch. A. Willard and A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 83–90Google Scholar
  8. Lorenzen P. and K. Lorenz: 1978, Dialogische Logik, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
  9. Mackenzie J.: 1990, Four Dialogue Systems, Studia Logica 49, 567–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Walton D. N.: 1995, A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy, University of Alabama Press, TuscaloosaGoogle Scholar
  11. Walton D. N.: 1998, The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument, University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  12. Walton D. N. and E. C. W. Krabbe: 1995, Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning, State University of New York Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory and RhetoricUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Theoretical PhilosophyUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations