Argumentation

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 223–231 | Cite as

Equivocation as a Point of Order

Article

Abstract

Equivocation, or multiple meaning, is explained through the introduction of an additional response, the distinction, to points of order in formal dialogue objecting to immediate inconsistency.

Keywords

Ambiguity Dialogue Equivocation Meaning Point of order 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aristotle: 1968, ‹Sophistical Refutations’ (tr. W. A. Pickard-Cambridge), in W. D. Ross (ed.), The Works of Aristotle, volume 1, Oxford University Press, London. First printed 1928. References by chapter, and by the Bekker paginationGoogle Scholar
  2. Barth E. M. and E. C. W. Krabbe: 1982, From Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation, Walter de Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. Black, M.: 1985, The Prevalence of Humbug, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.YGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandom, R.: 2002, Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  5. Carroll L. [C. Dodgson]: 1895, ‹What the Tortoise Said to Achilles’, Mind n.s. 4, 278–280Google Scholar
  6. Diogenes Laertius: 1966/1925, Vitae, Lives of Eminent Philosophers (tr. R. D. Hicks), William Heinemann, London. First printed 1925. References by book and paragraphGoogle Scholar
  7. Frankfurt, H. G.: 2005, On Bullshit, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.JGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamblin, C. L.: 1970, Fallacies, Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Harman, G.: 1984, Logic and Reasoning, Synthèse 60, 107–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heidegger, M.: 1962/1927, Being and Time (tr. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson), Harper & Row, New York. First published in 1927Google Scholar
  11. Kripke, S.: 1972, ‹Naming and Necessity’, in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 253–355Google Scholar
  12. Kuhn, T. S.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd edition), University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  13. Leibniz, G. W.: 1981/1765, New Essays on Human Understanding (tr. P. Remnant and J. Bennett), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. First published in 1756. References by chapter and section, and by the pagination of the 1962 Akademie-Verlag of Berlin edition printed in the margins of the translationGoogle Scholar
  14. Lewis, D. K.: 1982, Logic for Equivocators, Noûs 16, 431–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mackenzie, J.: 1979, How to Stop Talking to Tortoises, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 20, 705–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mackenzie, J.: 1989, Reasoning and Logic, Synthèse 69, 99–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Quine, W. V.: 1961/1948, ‹On What There Is’, in W. V. Quine (ed.), From a Logical Point of View, Harper, New York, pp. 1–19. First published in 1948Google Scholar
  18. Quine, W. V.: 1966/1956, ‹Quantifiers and Attitudes’, in W. V. Quine (ed.), The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, Random House, New York, pp. 183–194. First published in 1956Google Scholar
  19. Russell, B.: 1969, Autobiography, George Allen & Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. van Laar, J. A.: 2003, The Dialectic of Ambiguity: A contribution to the Study of Argumentation (Dissertation), Rijksuniversiteit GroningenGoogle Scholar
  21. Wittgenstein, L.: 1963/1953, Philosophical Investigations (tr. G. E. M. Anscombe), Blackwell, Oxford. First published in 1953Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Policy and Practice, Faculty of Education and Social Work A-35University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations