Argumentation

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 63–81

The Fallaciousness of Threats: Character and Ad Baculum

Article

Abstract

Robert Kimball, in “What’s Wrong with ArgumentumAd Baculum?” (Argumentation, 2006) argues that dialogue-based models of rational argumentation do not satisfactorily account for what is objectionable about more malicious uses of threats encountered in some ad baculum arguments. We review the dialogue-based approach to argumentum ad baculum, and show how it can offer more than Kimball thinks for analyzing such threat arguments and ad baculum fallacies.

Keywords

abductive reasoning dialectical argumentation fallacies negotiation threats virtue ethics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of WinnipegWinnipegCanada
  2. 2.Department of LinguisticsCatholic University of MilanMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations