Archival Science

, Volume 14, Issue 3–4, pp 397–419 | Cite as

Mobilizing records: re-framing archival description to support human rights

  • Stacy WoodEmail author
  • Kathy Carbone
  • Marika Cifor
  • Anne Gilliland
  • Ricardo Punzalan
Original Paper


This article seeks to raise consciousness within the field of archival studies in order to foster a generative discussion about how descriptive practices might be expanded, approached differently, or completely rethought. It brings together crosscutting theoretical issues and provides practical examples of mediation in order to mobilize these records in support of human rights work. It first problematizes the foundational archival precept of respect des fonds and its sub-principles of original order and provenance. It then analyzes the necessary transformation of institutional policies and standards in order to foster trust and transparency and identifies structural or system wide strategies for ameliorating past abuses.


Human rights Archival theory Archival description Archival education 


  1. Adami T (2007) “Who will be left to tell the tale?” Recordkeeping and international criminal jurisprudence. Arch Sci 7:213–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates J, Rowley J (2011) Social reproduction and exclusion in subject indexing: a comparison of public library OPACs and LibraryThing folksonomy. J Doc 67(3):431–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BBC (2013) Croatians tear down Serbian signs in Vukovar. BBC News. 2 September. Accessed 9 June 2014
  4. Bowker G, Star S (2000) Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell K (1973) The rhetoric of women’s liberation: an oxymoron. Q J Speech 59(1):74–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caswell M (2010) Khmer Rouge archives: accountability, truth, and memory in Cambodia. Arch Sci 10(1):25–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caswell M (2012) Using classification to convict the Khmer Rouge. J Doc 68(2):162–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caswell M (2014) Archiving the unspeakable: silence, memory, and the photographic record in Cambodia. University of Wisconsin Press, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  9. Caswell M, Broman G, Kirmer J, Martin L, Sowry N (2012) Implementing a social justice framework in an introduction to archives course: lessons from both sides of the classroom. InterActions UCLA J Educ Inf Stud 8(2).
  10. Christen K (2011) Opening archives: respectful repatriation. Am Arch 74:185–210Google Scholar
  11. Christen K (2012) Does information really want to be free? Indigenous knowledge systems and the question of openness. Int J Commun 6:2879–2893Google Scholar
  12. Cook T (1992) The concept of the archival fonds: theory, description, and provenance in the post-custodial era. Archivaria 35:24–37Google Scholar
  13. Corti L (2000) Progress and problems of preserving and providing access to qualitative data for social research—the international picture of an emerging culture. Forum Qual Soc Res 1(3).
  14. Corti L, Day A, Backhouse G (2000) Confidentiality and informed consent: issues for consideration in the preservation of and provision of access to qualitative data archives. Forum Qual Soc Res 1(3).
  15. Crooke E (2010) The politics of community heritage: motivations, authority and control. Int J Herit Stud 16(1–2):16–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Brito A, Enriquez C, Aguilar P (eds) (2001) The politics of memory and democratization: transitional justice in democratizing societies. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Dubriwny T (2005) Consciousness-raising as collective rhetoric: the articulation of experience in the redstocking abortion speak-out of 1969. Q J Speech 91(4):395–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duff W, Harris V (2002) Stories and names: archival description as narrating records and constructing meanings. Arch Sci 2(3):263–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Duff W, Flinn A, Suurtamm K, Wallace D (2013) Social justice impact of archives: a preliminary investigation. Arch Sci 13(4):317–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunbar A (2006) Introducing critical race theory to archival discourse: getting the conversation started. Arch Sci 6:109–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duranti L, Thibodeau K (2001) The InterPARES international research project. Inf Manag J 35(1):44–51Google Scholar
  22. Faulkhead S (2009) Connecting through records: narratives of Koorie Victoria. Arch Manuscr 37(2):60–88Google Scholar
  23. Flinn A (2008) Other ways of thinking, other ways of being. Documenting the margins and the transitory: what to preserve, how to collect. In: Craven L (ed) What are archives: cultural and theoretical perspectives: a reader. Ashgate, Burlington, pp 109–128Google Scholar
  24. Genocide Archive Rwanda: perpetrator testimonies (n.d.) Genocide Archive Rwanda. Accessed 9 June 2014
  25. Gilliland A (2011a) Reflections on the value of metadata archaeology for recordkeeping in a global, digital world. J Soc Arch 32(1):97–112Google Scholar
  26. Gilliland A (2011b) Neutrality, social justice and the obligations of archival education and educators in the twenty-first century. Arch Sci 11(3–4):193–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gilliland A (2012) Contemplating co-creator rights in archival description. Knowl Organ 39(5):340–346Google Scholar
  28. Gilliland A (2014) Conceptualizing twenty-first-century archives. Society of American Archivists, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  29. Gilliland A, McKemmish S (2014) The role of participatory archives in furthering human rights, reconciliation and recovery. Atlanti Rev Mod Arch Theory Pract 24 (in press)Google Scholar
  30. Gilliland A, Willer M (2014) Metadata for the information multiverse. In: Proceedings of iConference 2014, Berlin, Germany, 4–7 March 2014Google Scholar
  31. Gilliland A, Lindberg L, McCargar V, Langmead A, Lauriault T, Leahey-Sugimoto M, Evans J, Tennis JT, Wang H (2008) Investigating the roles and requirements, manifestations and management of metadata in the creation of reliable and preservation of authentic electronic entities created by dynamic, interactive and experiential systems: Report on the work and findings of the InterPARES 2 description cross domain group. In: Duranti L, Preston R (eds) International research on permanent authentic records in electronic systems (InterPARES) 2: experiential, interactive and dynamic records. Associazione Nazionale Archivistica Italiana, Padova, pp 261–307Google Scholar
  32. Gorman M (2003) Cataloguing in an electronic age. Cat Classif Q 36(3–4):5–17Google Scholar
  33. Hammersley M (1997) Qualitative data archiving: some reflections on its prospects and problems. Sociology 31(1):131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harris V (2002) The archival sliver: power, memory and archives in South Africa. Arch Sci 2(1–2):63–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harris V (2007) Archives and justice: a South African perspective. Society of American Archivists, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  36. Hawkins K (2009) Reflections on InterPARES: a pattern language for electronic records. Archivaria 67:157–188Google Scholar
  37. Hayner P (2010) Unspeakable truths: transitional justice and the challenge of truth commissions. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Hensen S (1997) “NISTF II” and EAD: the evolution of archival description. Am Arch 60(3):284–296Google Scholar
  39. Hirobayashi J (2008) Enduring communities: ‘concentration camp’ or ‘relocation center’—what’s in a name? Discov Nikkei. Accessed 9 June 2014
  40. Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1997) Bringing them home: the ‘Stolen Children’ report. Accessed 5 Mar 2014
  41. Hurley C (1995) Problems with provenance. Arch Manuscr 23:234–259Google Scholar
  42. Hurley C (2005) Parallel provenance: if these are your records, where are your stories? Records Continuum Group Publications. Accessed 2 Mar 2014
  43. Hutterer KL (1978) Dean C. Worcester and Phillipine anthropology. Philipp Q Cult Soc 6(3):125–156Google Scholar
  44. Huvila I (2008) Participatory archive: towards decentralized curation, radical user orientation, and broader contextualization of records management. Arch Sci 8:15–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Iacovino L (2010) Rethinking archival, ethical and legal frameworks for records of Indigenous Australian communities: a participant relationship model of rights and responsibilities. Arch Sci 10:353–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jimerson RC (2007) Archives for all: professional responsibility and social justice. Am Arch 70(2):252–281Google Scholar
  47. Jimerson RC (2009) Archives Power: memory, accountability, and social justice. Society of American Archivists, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  48. Josias A (2011) Toward an understanding of archives as a feature of collective memory. Arch Sci 11(1–2):95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ketelaar E (2008) Archives as spaces of memory. J Soc Arch 29(1):9–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lipsitz G (1995) The possessive investment in whiteness: how white people profit from identity politics. Temple University Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  51. Lockwood FC (1929) The life of Edward E. Ayer. A.C. McClurg & Co., ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  52. Mathiesen K (2012) A defense of Native Americans’ rights over their traditional cultural expressions. Am Arch 75:456–481Google Scholar
  53. McKemmish S (1994) Are records ever actual? In: McKemmish S, Piggott M (eds) The records continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian archives first fifty years. Ancora Press, Melbourne, pp 187–203Google Scholar
  54. McKemmish S, Faulkhead S, Russell L (2011) Distrust in the archive: reconciling records. Arch Sci 11:211–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Muller S, Feith J, Fruin R (1898) Handleiding voor het ordenen en beschrijven van archiven [Manual for the arrangement and description of archives]. Erven B. Van der Kamp, GroningenGoogle Scholar
  56. Nesmith T (2006) The concept of societal provenance and records of nineteenth-century Aboriginal-European relations in Western Canada: implications for archival theory and practice. Arch Sci 6(3–4):351–360Google Scholar
  57. Nordland LP (2004) The concept of “secondary provenance”: re-interpreting Ac ko mok ki’s map as evolving text. Archivaria 1:58Google Scholar
  58. Novak JR (2013) Examining activism in practice: a qualitative study of archival activism, Ph D dissertation. University of California, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  59. Olson HA (2001) The power to name: representation in library catalogs. Signs 26(3):639–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Olson HA (2007) How we construct subjects: a feminist analysis. Libr Trends 56(2):509–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pearce-Moses R (2005) Provenance. A glossary of archival and records terminology. Society of American Archivists, Chicago. Accessed 9 June 2014
  62. Pidd H (2011) Germans piece together millions of lives spied on by Stasi. The Guardian. Accessed 14 Mar 2014
  63. Piggot M, McKemmish S (2002) Recordkeeping, reconciliation and political reality. In: Australian society of archivists annual conference, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  64. Plateau Peoples’ Web Portal (n.d.) About, curation process. Plateau Peoples’ Web Portal. Accessed 3 Mar 2014
  65. Quintana AG (1997) Archives of the security services of former repressive regimes. International Council of Archives, ParisGoogle Scholar
  66. Rioux K (2010) Metatheory in library and information science: a nascent social justice approach. J Educ Libr Inf Sci 51:9–17Google Scholar
  67. Sachs A (2007) Archives, truth, and reconciliation. Archivaria 62:1–14Google Scholar
  68. Sassoon J, Burrows T (2009) Minority reports: indigenous and community voices in archives. Papers from the 4th international conference on the history of records and archives (ICHORA 4), Perth, Western Australia, August 2008. Arch Sci 9(1):1–5Google Scholar
  69. Shilton K, Srinivasan R (2007) Participatory appraisal and arrangement for multicultural archival collections. Archivaria 63:87–101Google Scholar
  70. Simons HW (1970) Requirements, problems, strategies: a theory of persuasion for social movements. Q J Speech 56:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Slymovics S (2014) How to accept German reparations. University of Pennsylvania Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  72. Society of American Archivists (2011). History and memory. SAA core values statements and code of ethics. Accessed 9 June 2014
  73. Society of American Archivists, Encoded Archival Description Working Group (2002). Encoded archival description tag library. Accessed 9 June 2014
  74. Srinivasan R (2013) Re-thinking the cultural codes of new media: the question concerning ontology. New Media Soc 15(2):203–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Stefanac T, White K (forthcoming) Representation, rights and identity of Croatia’s roma community: An archival perspective. In: Proceedings of the summer school and conference on records, archives and memory, University of Zadar Press, ZadarGoogle Scholar
  76. Stoler A (2010) Along the archival grain: epistemic anxieties and the colonial common sense. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  77. Sullivan RJ (1991) Exemplar of Americanism: the Phillipine career of Dean C. Worcester. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  78. Sweet K (1998) Volumes of hope. University of Chicago Magazine. Accessed 14 Mar 2014
  79. Theodoridou M, Tzitzikas Y, Doerr M, Marketakis Y, Melessanakis V (2010) Modeling and querying provenance by extending CIDOC CRM. Distrib Parallel Databases 27(2):169–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Thomson D, Bzdel L, Golden-Biddle K, Reay T, Estabrooks CA (2005) Central questions of anonymization: a case study of secondary use of qualitative data. Forum Qual Soc Res 6(1).
  81. United Nations (2005) Economic and Social Council. Commission on Human Rights. Sixty-first session. Item 17 of the provisional agenda. Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. Impunity. Report of the independent expert to update the Set of principles to combat impunity, Diane Orentlicher. Addendum: Updated Set of principles for the protection and promotion of human rights through action to combat impunity. E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1: 8 February. Accessed 14 Mar 2014
  82. Wakimoto DK, Bruce C, Partridge H (2013) Archivist as activist: lessons from three queer community archives in California. Arch Sci 13(4):293–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Walch VI (1990) The role of standards in the archival management of electronic records. Am Arch 53(1):30–43Google Scholar
  84. Weld K (2014) Paper cadavers: the archives of dictatorship in Guatemala. Duke University Press, DurhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wilkinson T (2013) Gunmen torch vital records of rights group in El Salvador. Los Angeles Times. Accessed 14 Mar 2014
  86. Wurl J (2005) Ethnicity as provenance: in search of values and principles for documenting the immigrant experience. Arch Issues 29(1):65–76Google Scholar
  87. Yakel E (2003) Archival representation. Arch Sci 3:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stacy Wood
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kathy Carbone
    • 1
  • Marika Cifor
    • 1
  • Anne Gilliland
    • 1
  • Ricardo Punzalan
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Information StudiesUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.College of Information StudiesUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations