Advertisement

Archival Science

, Volume 14, Issue 3–4, pp 345–363 | Cite as

Documenting and classifying labor: the effect of legal discourse on the treatment of H-2A workers

  • Patricia GarciaEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The H-2A temporary agricultural worker program is a large-scale governmental program that is touted as a legal and documented avenue for nonimmigrant foreign workers to gain temporary employment in the USA. This paper historically situates the H-2A program within the larger history of American temporary work programs and argues that the H-2A program has inadequately curtailed the exploitation of temporary agricultural workers by focusing on documenting immigration through a lengthy application process and complex classification system, while failing to properly document the employment conditions of temporary agricultural workers once they have arrived in the USA. The analysis of the federal government’s documentation and classification practices exposes how discursive practices are legitimized through the legal codes of two statutory regimes, labor and immigration law, and exposes how these discursive practices create rigid worker classifications that largely structure the debate on immigration and the rights of documented and undocumented workers.

Keywords

Government records Temporary workers Legal discourse H-2A Classification Documentation Workers’ rights 

References

  1. Aliens and Nationality, 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(5)(xi)(A) (2012)Google Scholar
  2. Alvarado LA (2001) A lesson from my grandfather, the bracero. Chicano Latino Law Rev 22:55–73Google Scholar
  3. Ashby BW (2007) Indentured guests—how the H-2A and H-2B temporary guest worker programs create the conditions for indentured servitude and why upfront reimbursement for guest workers’ transportation, visa, and recruitment costs is the solution. Univ Memphis Law Rev 38:893–921Google Scholar
  4. Bosworth CJ (2004) Guest worker policy: a critical analysis of President Bush’s proposed reform. Hastings Law J 56:1095–1120Google Scholar
  5. Bowker GC, Star SL (1999) Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowker GC, Star SL (2000) Invisible mediators of action: classification and the ubiquity of standards. Mind Cult Activ 7(1/2):147–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2010) Standard occupational classification. http://www.bls.gov/soc/. Accessed 24 June 2014
  8. Caswell M (2011) Using classification to convict the Khmer Rouge. J Doc 68(2):162–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Center for History and New Media (2014) Bracero history archive. http://braceroarchive.org
  10. Cohen D (2011) Braceros. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel HillCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daniel D (2010) Documenting the immigrant and ethnic experience in American archives. Am Arch 73:82–104Google Scholar
  12. Department of State (2012) Nonimmigrant visas issued by classification, 2008–2012. www.travel.state.gov/pdf/FY12AnnualReport-TableXVIB.pdf. Accessed 08 March 2014
  13. Duff WM, Harris V (2002) Stories and names: archival description as narrating records and constructing meanings. Arch Sci 2:263–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fairclough N (1992) Discourse and text: linguistic and intertexual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse Soc 3(2):193–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fairclough N, Wodak R (1997) Critical discourse analysis. In: van Dijk TA (ed) Introduction to discourse analysis. SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Farmworker Justice (2011) No way to treat a guest: Why the H-2A agricultural visa program fails U.S. and foreign workers. http://www.farmworkerjustice.org/sites/default/files/documents/7.2.a.6%20fwj.pdf. Accessed 09 March 2014
  17. Foucault M (1995) Discipline & punish: the birth of the prison (Alan Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage Books, New York (Original work published in 1975)Google Scholar
  18. Government Accountability Office (2012) H-2A visa program: modernization and improved guidance could reduce employer application burden. Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, Poultry, Marketing and Agriculture Security, Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, U.S. Senate. http://www.gao.gov/assets/650/648175.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2014
  19. Griffith KL (2009) U.S. migrant worker law: the interstices of immigration law and labor and employment law. Comp Labor Law Policy Law J 31:125–162Google Scholar
  20. Guiterrez-Jones C (1995) Rethinking the borderlands: between Chicano culture and legal discourse. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  21. Hall S (1997) The work of representation. In: Hall S (ed) Representation: cultural representations and signifying practices. SAGE, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  22. Immigration Act of 1917, 8 U.S.C. (1952)Google Scholar
  23. Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(A) and (B) (2011)Google Scholar
  24. International Council on Archives (2000) ISAD(G): general international standard archival description, 2nd edn. Adopted by the Committee on Descriptive Standards, Stockholm, Sweden, pp 19–22. September 1999. Ottawa 2000. http://www.icacds.org.uk/eng/ISAD(G).pdf. Accessed 10 March 2014
  25. Johnston E (2010) The United States guestworker program: the need for reform. Vanderbilt J Transnatl Law 43:1121–1150Google Scholar
  26. Ketelaar E (2005) Sharing: collected memories in communities of records. Arch Manuscr 33:44–61Google Scholar
  27. Lemke JL (1995) Textual politics: discourse and social dynamics. Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. McKemmish S, Gilliland-Swetland A, Ketelaar E (2005) ‘Communities of memory’: pluralising archival research and education agendas. Arch Manuscr 33:146–174Google Scholar
  29. Mehan H (1997) The discourse of the illegal immigration debate: a case study in the politics of representation. Discourse Soc 8:249–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Office of Foreign Labor Certification (2012) Annual report. http://www.laborimmigration.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/OFLC-FY-2012-Annual-Report.pdf. Accessed 09 March 2014
  31. Osario J (2005) Proof of a life lived: the plight of the Braceros and what it says about how we treat records. Arch Issues 29(2):95–104Google Scholar
  32. Reisigl M, Wodak R (2001) Discourse and discrimination. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Rodriguez CM (2007) Guest workers and integration: toward a theory of what immigrants and Americans owe one another. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, pp 219–288Google Scholar
  34. Schellenberg TR (1956) The appraisal of modern public records. Bull Nat Arch 8:1–46Google Scholar
  35. Schwartz JM, Cook T (2002) Archives, records, and power: the making of modern memory. Arch Sci 2:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shankar K (2007) Order from chaos: the poetics and pragmatics of scientific recordkeeping. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 58(10):1457–1466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Southern Poverty Law Center (2013) Close to slavery: guestworker programs in the United States. http://www.splcenter.org/sites/default/files/downloads/publication/SPLC-Close-to-Slavery-2013.pdf. Accessed 08 March 2014
  38. Stoler AL (2002) Colonial archives and the act of governance. Arch Sci 2:87–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tabatabai M (2011) The abuse of H-2 visas and their use for labor trafficking purposes. ExpressO. http://works.bepress.com/maryam_tabatabai/1. Accessed 14 June 2014
  40. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (2010) National congressional conference: overview of H-2A and H-2B nonimmigrant worker classifications. http://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/USCIS/Resources/Resources%20for%20Congress/Congressional%20Reports/H-2A%20and%20H-2B%20Nonimmigrant%20Worker%20Classifications.pdf. Accessed 14 June 2014
  41. Van Dijk T (1993) Elite discourse and racism. SAGE, Newbury ParkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Villareal-O’Rourke A (2010) Embracing reality: the guest worker program revisited. Harv Lat Law Rev 9:179–194Google Scholar
  43. Wodak R, Meyer M (2009) Methods of critical discourse analysis. SAGE, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  44. Yakel E (2001) The social construction of accountability: radiologists and their record-keeping practices. Inf Soc 17:233–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information StudiesUniversity of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)Los AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations