Archival Science

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 315–328 | Cite as

Event-based archival information organization

Original Paper

Abstract

Event-based information organization methods from other communities provide insights for rethinking archival information organization and redesigning archival description metadata. Differences between event and function are analyzed, and the possibility of using events as a kind of provenance to organize and describe archival information is discussed. Two approaches to redesigning archival description metadata are discussed: making the current narrative descriptions of archives management events more structured and replacing encoded archival description with a metadata framework based on recordkeeping and archives management events in records life cycle.

Keywords

Events Provenance Archival description Event-based information organization 

References

  1. Adali S, Pearce S, Sapino M (2006) On querying and exploring activities on a user’s desktop. In: Proceedings of 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering, IEEEGoogle Scholar
  2. Bountouri L, Gergatsoulis M (2011) The semantic mapping of archival metadata to the CIDOC CRM Ontology. J Arch Organ 9(3–4):174–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Doerr M, Dionissiadou I (1998) Data example of the CIDOC reference model—epitaphios GE34604. http://www.cidoc-crm.org/docs/crm_example_1.pdf. Accessed 28 Oct 2013
  4. Encoded Archival Description Working Group (2002)  Encoded Archival description Tag Library, version 2002. http://www.loc.gov/ead/tglib/elements/function.html. Accessed 6 June 2014
  5. Gaitanou P, Bountouri L, Gergatsoulis M (2012) Automatic generation of crosswalks through CIDOC CRM. Metadata and semantics research. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 264–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Graves MJ (2003) Concert event metadata: describing concerts effectively in a digital environment. http://ils.unc.edu/MSpapers/2830.pdf Accessed 29 Oct 2013
  7. Hyvönen E et al (2009) CultureSampo: a national publication system of cultural heritage on the semantic Web 2.0. In: The semantic web research and applications, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. pp 851–856Google Scholar
  8. ICOM/CIDOC Documentation Standards Group (2013) Definition of the CIDOC conceptual reference model. http://www.cidoc-crm.org/docs/cidoc_crm_version_5.1.2.pdf Accessed 25 May 2014
  9. ISDF: International Standard for Describing Functions: developed by the Committee on Best Practices and Standards 1st edn, Dresden, Germany, 2−4 May 2007 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. ISO 23081-1 (2006) Information and documentation—records management processes—metadata for records—part 1: principles. ISOGoogle Scholar
  11. Jeong S, Kim HG (2010) SEDE: an ontology for scholarly event description. J Inf Sci 36(2):209–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Junnila M, Hyvönen E, Salminen M (2006) Describing and linking cultural semantic content by using situations and actions. In: Proceedings of the 12th Finnish artificial intelligence conference STeP (Vol. 14)Google Scholar
  13. Kaneiwa K, Iwazume M, Fukuda K (2007) An upper ontology for event classifications and relations. AI 2007: advances in artificial intelligence, 20th Australian joint conference on artificial intelligence, Gold Coast, Australia, Dec 2–6, 2007, In: Proceedings, Springer, Berlin, pp 394–403 http://www.springerlink.com/content/834817503r831371/fulltext.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2014
  14. Lagoze C, Hunter J (2006) The ABC ontology and model. J Digit Inf 2(2). http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/44/47. Accessed 3 June 2014
  15. Lin CH, Hong JS, Doerr M (2008) Issues in an inference platform for generating deductive knowledge: a case study in cultural heritage digital libraries using the CIDOC CRM. Int J Digit Libr 8(2):115–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. PREMIS Editorial Committee (2011) Introduction and supporting materials from PREMIS data dictionary for preservation metadata, version 2.1. http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v2/premis-report-2-1.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2014
  17. Raimond Y, Abdallah S (2007) The event ontology. http://purl.org/NET/c4dm/event.owl. Accessed 17 Jan 2014
  18. Ranjan A (2006) SEraja—the biggest repository of events on the web? http://www.webyantra.net/2006/08/09/serajathe-biggest-repository-of-events-on-the-web/. Accessed 28 Oct 2013
  19. Tomberg V, Lamas D, Laanpere M, Reinhardt W, Jovanovic J (2011) Towards a comprehensive call ontology for Research 2.0. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on knowledge management and knowledge technologies. ACMGoogle Scholar
  20. Van Hage WR, Malaisé V, Segers R, Hollink L, Schreiber G (2011) Design and use of the simple event model (SEM). Web Semant Sci Serv Agents World Wide Web 9(2):128–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang XJ, Mamadgi S, Thekdi A, Sundaram H (2007) Eventory -- An event based media repository. In: Proceedings of international conference on semantic computing, 2007. pp. 95–104. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  22. Westermann U, Jain R (2006) A generic event model for event-centric multimedia data management in eChronicle applications. In: Data engineering workshops, 2006. In: Proceedings. 22nd international conference. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  23. Westermann U, Jain R (2007) Toward a common event model for multimedia applications. Multimed IEEE 14(1):19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of InformationUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations