Archival Science

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 345–352 | Cite as

Ten years of archival science

Original paper

Abstract

This article reviews how the journal Archival Science––International Journal on Recorded Information in the first 10 years has endeavoured to be integrated, interdisciplinary, and intercultural in promoting the development of archival science as an autonomous scientific discipline.

Keywords

Archival science Multidisciplinarity 

References

  1. Cook T (2001) Archival science and postmodernism: new formulations for old concepts. Arch Sci 1:3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cook T, Schwartz JM (2002) Archives, records, and power: from (postmodern) theory to (archival) performance. Arch Sci 2:171–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Craven L (2008) From the archivist’s cardigan to the very dead sheep: what are archives? What are archivists? What do they do? In: Craven L (ed) What are archives? Cultural and theoretical perspectives: a reader. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  4. Hedstrom M (2002) Archives, memory, and interfaces with the past. Arch Sci 2:21–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ihanus J (2007) The archive and psychoanalysis: memories and histories toward futures. Int Forum Psychoanal 16(2):119–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ketelaar E (2001) Tacit narratives: the meanings of archives. Arch Sci 1:131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ketelaar E (2002) Archival temples, archival prisons: modes of power and protection. Arch Sci 2:221–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kim H, Lee JY (2008) Exploring the emerging intellectual structure of archival studies using text mining: 2001–2004. J Inf Sci 34:356–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McKemmish S (2001) Placing records continuum theory and practice. Arch Sci 1:333–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McLeod J, Hare C (2010) Development of RMJ. A mirror of the development of the profession and discipline of records management. Rec Manag J 20:9–40Google Scholar
  11. Nesmith T (1999) Still fuzzy, but more accurate: some thoughts on the ‘ghosts’ of archival theory. Archivaria 47:136–150Google Scholar
  12. Nesmith T (2002) Seeing archives: postmodernism and the changing intellectual place of archives. Am Arch 65:24–41Google Scholar
  13. Schwartz JM, Cook T (2002) Archives, records, and power: the making of modern memory. Arch Sci 2:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shepherd E (2009) Archival science. In: Bates MJ, Maack MN (eds) Encyclopedia of library and information sciences, 3rd edn, vol 1. CRC Press, pp 1, 179–191Google Scholar
  15. Stoler AL (2002) Colonial archives and the arts of governance. Arch Sci 2:87–109Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universiteit van AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations