This article reviews how the journal Archival Science––International Journal on Recorded Information in the first 10 years has endeavoured to be integrated, interdisciplinary, and intercultural in promoting the development of archival science as an autonomous scientific discipline.
KeywordsArchival science Multidisciplinarity
- Craven L (2008) From the archivist’s cardigan to the very dead sheep: what are archives? What are archivists? What do they do? In: Craven L (ed) What are archives? Cultural and theoretical perspectives: a reader. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
- McLeod J, Hare C (2010) Development of RMJ. A mirror of the development of the profession and discipline of records management. Rec Manag J 20:9–40Google Scholar
- Nesmith T (1999) Still fuzzy, but more accurate: some thoughts on the ‘ghosts’ of archival theory. Archivaria 47:136–150Google Scholar
- Nesmith T (2002) Seeing archives: postmodernism and the changing intellectual place of archives. Am Arch 65:24–41Google Scholar
- Shepherd E (2009) Archival science. In: Bates MJ, Maack MN (eds) Encyclopedia of library and information sciences, 3rd edn, vol 1. CRC Press, pp 1, 179–191Google Scholar
- Stoler AL (2002) Colonial archives and the arts of governance. Arch Sci 2:87–109Google Scholar