Archival Science

, Volume 9, Issue 3–4, pp 173–185

Culture and evidence: or what good are the archives? Archives and archivists in twentieth century England

Original paper

Abstract

Archives have the potential to change people’s lives. They are created to enable the conduct of business and accountability, but they also support a democratic society’s expectations for transparency and the protection of rights, they underpin citizen’s rights and are the raw material of our history and memory. This paper examines these issues in the context of the historical development of archives and archivists in twentieth century England. The research lays the foundations for understanding how and why the modern archives and records management profession developed in England. This paper will investigate the historical conflict (or is it a continuum?) between archives as culture and as evidence. The story identifies and highlights the contributions made by many fascinating individuals who established archives services and professional practice in England in the twentieth century. They shaped the archive in a very real way, and their individual enthusiasms, interests and understandings set the course of the English archival profession. To a great extent, it was these individuals, rather than government or legislation, that set the boundaries of English archives, they decided what was included (acquired) and what was not (of archival value.) The conclusion will consider the more fundamental questions: what are archives and what are they for, or perhaps, ‘what good are the archives’?

Keywords

History of archives Archives in England Twentieth century Culture Evidence 

References

  1. Bell P, Stitt F (2002) George Herbert Fowler and county records. J Soc Arch 23:249–264. doi:10.1080/00379810220120618 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carey J (2005) What good are the arts?. Faber and Faber, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Cook T, Schwartz J (2002) Archives, records and power. Arch Sci 2:1–4. doi:10.1007/BF02435620 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ede J (1975) The record office, central and local: evolution of a relationship. J Soc Arch 5:207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellis R (1969) The Royal Commission on historical manuscripts: a short history and explanation. In Manuscripts and men. HMSO, London, pp 1–39Google Scholar
  6. Ellis M (2005) Establishing a research culture for archive administration in the UK. Educ Inf 23:91–101Google Scholar
  7. Fowler GH (1923) The care of county muniments. County Councils Association, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Godber J (1949) Local archives of Great Britain I: the county record office at Bedford. Archives 1(1):10–20Google Scholar
  9. Gray V (1987) The county record office: the unfolding of an idea. In: Neale K (ed) An Essex tribute: essays presented to Frederick G Emission as a tribute to his life and work. Leopard’s Head Press, London, pp 11–25Google Scholar
  10. Grigg J (1954) Committee on departmental records report. CMD 9163. The Grigg report. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Hamilton C, Harris V et al (2002) Refiguring the archive. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  12. Holden J (2004) Capturing cultural value. Demos, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Jenkinson H (1922) A manual of archive administration. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Knowles D (1963) Great historical enterprises. Thomas Nelson & Sons, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. McKemmish S, Piggott M, Reed B, Upward F (eds) (2005) Archives: recordkeeping in society. Charles Sturt University, Wagga WaggaGoogle Scholar
  16. Museums, Libraries and Archives Council (2004) Listening to the past, speaking to the future: report of the archives task force. MLA, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. National Council on Archives (2002) Changing the future of our past. NCA, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  18. Phillimore miscellanea—preservation of records (1889). Press cutting, The Athenaeum 13 March 1889; press cutting, The Reliquary July 1889; Draft of a Bill entitled an Act for the Preservation of Public and Private Records, 1889. Institute of Historical Research, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Report (1902) Committee appointed to enquire as to existing arrangements for the collection and custody of local records and as to further measures which it may be advisable to take for the purpose. Cd. 1335. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Report (1912) Royal commission on public records appointed to inquire into and report on the state of the public records and local records of a public nature of England and Wales. Cd. 6361. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Roper M (1989) The Public Record Office and the profession. J Soc Arch 10:162–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shepherd E (2004) Towards professionalism? Archives and archivists in England in the 20th century. PhD Dissertation, University of LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Shepherd, E (2009) Archives and archivists in twentieth century England. Ashgate Aldershot (in press)Google Scholar
  24. Turner M (2004) Archives workforce report (training review). National council on archives/resource, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information StudiesUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations