Sodium propionate as a dietary acidifier for European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) fry: immune competence, gut microbiome, and intestinal histology benefits
- 33 Downloads
This study was undertaken to assess the effects of dietary sodium propionate (SP) supplementation on the growth, haemato-immunological parameters, gut microbiota, and intestinal histology of European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) fry. In total, four diets were evaluated during a 90-day growth trial: a control (CTRL) diet without SP supplementation and three diets including 0.1%, 0.2%, or 0.3% SP, which were called SP1, SP2, and SP3, respectively. Diets were assigned to seabass (initial body weight: 0.45 ± 0.23 g), and the results revealed a 34%, 19%, and 15.6% increase in weight gain in SP3-, SP2-, and SP1-fed fish, respectively, concomitant with a lower feed conversion ratio in these fish than in fish not receiving the supplement (CTRL), which exhibited the lowest performance among all fish groups. Administration of 0.3% or 0.2% SP elevated the carcass protein content, major blood constituents, and immune function indicators compared to the CTRL. In addition, dietary inclusion of SP positively modified the bacterial community composition in the distal intestine (DI) of fish, causing an approximately 95% and 87% reduction in total microbial count in SP3- and SP2-fed fish, respectively, compared to CTRL fish. Vibrio spp. were non-existent (zero or negligible) in fish fed the SP2 and SP3 diets, and the number of faecal coliform bacteria gradually decreased to zero in SP3-fed fish. Additionally, an improvement in fish intestinal features, particularly in the DI, was evident from measurements of histological sections from the proximal, mid, and distal intestine. The greater villus area (height and width) and goblet cell count in fish fed the SP3 or SP2 diet than in fish not receiving the supplement suggested stimulation of digestive secretions with enhanced mucus production. In conclusion, enrichment of the diet with either 0.3% or 0.2% SP is capable of improving seabass fry growth performance, general health status, immune response efficiency, and intestinal function.
KeywordsSodium propionate European seabass Immunity Microbiome Intestinal histology
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed by the authors.
- Abdel-Mohsen HH, Wassef EA, El-Bermawy NM, Abdel-Meguid NE, Saleh NE, Barakat Kh M, Shaltout OE (2018) Advantageous effects of dietary butyrate on growth, immunity competence, intestinal microbiota and histomorphology of European Seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) fry. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries 22(4):93–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- AOAC (2015) Official methods of analysis of the Association of official Analytical Chemists. 20th Ed. 1, Benjamin Franklin Station, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- Dacie J, Lewis S (2006) Practical hematology. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 26–47Google Scholar
- Ellis AE (1990) Serum antiproteases in fish. In: Stolen JS, Fletcher TC, Anderson DP, Roberson BS, van Muiswinkel WB (eds) Techniques in fish immunology. SOS Publications, Fair Haven, pp 95–99Google Scholar
- Guerreiro I, Serra CR, Oliva-Teles A, Enes P (2018) Gut microbiota of European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) is modulated by short-chain fructooligo-saccharides and xylooligo-saccharides. Short communication. Aquacult Int 26:279–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-017-0220-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hassaan M, Wafa M, Soltan M, Goda A, Mogheth N (2014) Effect of dietary organic salts on growth, nutrient digestibility, mineral absorption and some biochemical indices of Nile tilapia; Oreochromis niloticus L. fingerlings. World Appl Sci J 29:47–55Google Scholar
- ISO, International Standard ISO 9308-1 (1990) Water Quality Detection and Enumeration of Coliform Organisms, Thermotolerant Coliform Organisms and Presumptive Escherichia coli. Part 1: Membrane Filtration Method. International Organization for Standardization. Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.iso.org/standard/16966.html
- Lückstädt C (2008a) The use of acidifiers in fish nutrition. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture. Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources. 3 (044): 1–8. https://www.cababstractsplus.org/cabreviews
- Lückstädt C (2008b) Effect of organic acid containing additives in worldwide aquaculture–sustainable production the non-antibiotic way: 71-77. In: Lückstüadt C (ed) Acidifiers in animal nutrition. A guide for feed preservation and acidification to promote animal performance. Nottingham University Press, NottinghamGoogle Scholar
- Menanteau-Ledouble S, Krauss I, Gonçalves RA, Weber B, Santos GA, El-Matbouli M (2017) Antimicrobial effect of Biotronic® Top3 supplement and efficacy in protecting rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) from infection by Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida. Res Vet Sci, 114: 95-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.03.010.
- Morken T, Kraugerud OF, Barrows FT, Sørensen M, Storebakken T, Øverland M (2011) Sodium diformate and extrusion temperature affect nutrient digestibility and physical quality of diets with fish meal and barley protein concentrate for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture 317:138–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ng WK, Koh CB (2016) The utilization and mode of action of organic acids in the feeds of cultured aquatic animals. Rev Aquac 0:1–27Google Scholar
- NRC (National Research Council) (2011) Nutrient requirements of fish and shrimp. National Council of the National Academies, Washington DC, p 376Google Scholar
- Piñeiro PS, Ferreiro UV, Calvar NE, Leal JM (Eds) (2013) New additives and ingredients in the formulation of aquafeeds. Centro Tecnológico del Mar Fundación CETMAR, Special Report, 81 ppGoogle Scholar
- Rimoldi S, Finzi G, Ceccotti C, Girardello R, Grimaldi A, Ascione C, Terova G (2016) Butyrate and taurine exert a mitigating effect on the inflamed distal intestine of European sea bass fed with a high percentage of soybean meal. Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 19:19–40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41240-016-0041-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ringo E, Zhou Z, Vecino JLG, Wadsworth S, Romero J, Krogdahl Å, Olsen RE, Dimitroglou A, Foey A, Daveis S, Owen M, Lauzon HL, Martinsen LL, De Schryver P, Bossier P, Sperstad S, Merrifield DL (2015) Effect of dietary components on the gut microbiota of aquatic animals. A never-endeng story? Aquac Nutr 22:1–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.12346 Google Scholar
- Sarker MSA, Satoh S, Kamata K, Haga Y, Yamamoto Y (2012) Supplementation effect(s) of organic acids and/or lipid to plant protein-based diets on juvenile yellowtail, Seriola quinqueradiata Temminck et Schlegel 1845, growth and, nitrogen and phosphorus excretion. Aquac Res 43:538–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Secombes CJ (1990) Isolation of salmonid macrophages and analysis of their killing activity. In: Stolen JS, Fletcher TC, Anderson DP, Roberson BS, Van Muiswinkel WB (eds) Techniques of fish immunology. SOS Publications, Fair Haven, pp 137–154 137e152Google Scholar
- Siwicki AK, Anderson DP (1993) Nonspecific defense mechanisms assay in fish: II. Potential killing activity of neutrophils and macrophages, lysozyme activity in serum and organs and total immunoglobulin (Ig) level in serum. In: Fish Disease Diagnosis and Prevention Methods. (Eds: Siwicki AK, Anderson DP and Waluga J). (Publ.,Wydawnictwo Instytutu Rybactwa Strodladowego) Olsztyn, Poland: 105-111Google Scholar
- Van-Kampen EJ, Zijlstra WG (1961) Standardization of hemoglobin-metery. Clin.Chem.Acta 6:438–544Google Scholar
- Zobell CE (1946) Marine Microbiology. Chronica Botanica, Waltham, p 240Google Scholar