Advertisement

Sodium propionate as a dietary acidifier for European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) fry: immune competence, gut microbiome, and intestinal histology benefits

  • Elham A. WassefEmail author
  • Norhan E. Saleh
  • Nabila E. Abdel-Meguid
  • Khouloud M. Barakat
  • Heba H. Abdel-Mohsen
  • Nagi M. El-bermawy
Article
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

This study was undertaken to assess the effects of dietary sodium propionate (SP) supplementation on the growth, haemato-immunological parameters, gut microbiota, and intestinal histology of European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) fry. In total, four diets were evaluated during a 90-day growth trial: a control (CTRL) diet without SP supplementation and three diets including 0.1%, 0.2%, or 0.3% SP, which were called SP1, SP2, and SP3, respectively. Diets were assigned to seabass (initial body weight: 0.45 ± 0.23 g), and the results revealed a 34%, 19%, and 15.6% increase in weight gain in SP3-, SP2-, and SP1-fed fish, respectively, concomitant with a lower feed conversion ratio in these fish than in fish not receiving the supplement (CTRL), which exhibited the lowest performance among all fish groups. Administration of 0.3% or 0.2% SP elevated the carcass protein content, major blood constituents, and immune function indicators compared to the CTRL. In addition, dietary inclusion of SP positively modified the bacterial community composition in the distal intestine (DI) of fish, causing an approximately 95% and 87% reduction in total microbial count in SP3- and SP2-fed fish, respectively, compared to CTRL fish. Vibrio spp. were non-existent (zero or negligible) in fish fed the SP2 and SP3 diets, and the number of faecal coliform bacteria gradually decreased to zero in SP3-fed fish. Additionally, an improvement in fish intestinal features, particularly in the DI, was evident from measurements of histological sections from the proximal, mid, and distal intestine. The greater villus area (height and width) and goblet cell count in fish fed the SP3 or SP2 diet than in fish not receiving the supplement suggested stimulation of digestive secretions with enhanced mucus production. In conclusion, enrichment of the diet with either 0.3% or 0.2% SP is capable of improving seabass fry growth performance, general health status, immune response efficiency, and intestinal function.

Keywords

Sodium propionate European seabass Immunity Microbiome Intestinal histology 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed by the authors.

References

  1. Abdel-Mohsen HH, Wassef EA, El-Bermawy NM, Abdel-Meguid NE, Saleh NE, Barakat Kh M, Shaltout OE (2018) Advantageous effects of dietary butyrate on growth, immunity competence, intestinal microbiota and histomorphology of European Seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) fry. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries 22(4):93–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amiza MA, Zakiah J, Khim L, Lay KW (2006) Fermentation of tempoyak using isolated tempoyak culture. Res J Microbiol 1(3):243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. AOAC (2015) Official methods of analysis of the Association of official Analytical Chemists. 20th Ed. 1, Benjamin Franklin Station, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Basset C, Holton J, O’Mahony R, Roitt R (2003) Innate immunity and pathogen-host interaction. Vaccine 21:12–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonaldo A, Roem AJ, Fagioli P, Pecchini A, Cipollini I, Gatta PP (2008) Influence of dietary levels of soybean meal on the performance and gut histology of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.) and European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.). Aquac Res 39:970–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carda-Dieguez M, Mira A, Fouz B (2013) Pyrosequencing survey of intestinal microbiota diversity in cultured seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) fed functional diets. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 87:451–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cerezuela R, Fumanal M, Tapia-Paniagua ST, Meseguer M, Morinigo MA, Esteban MA (2012) Histological alterations and microbial ecology of the intestine in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.) fed dietary probiotics and microalgae. Cell Tissue Res 350:477–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cotter PD, Hill C (2003) Surviving the acid test: responses of gram-positive bacteria to low pH. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67:429–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. da Silva BC, Vieira FN, Mouriño JLP, Bolivar N, Seiffert WQ (2016) Butyrate and propionate improve the growth performance of Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquac Res 47:612–623.  https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12520 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dacie J, Lewis S (2006) Practical hematology. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 26–47Google Scholar
  11. Dai X, Shu M, Fang W (2007) Histological and ultra-structural study of the digestive tract of rice field eel, Monopoterus albus. J Applied Ichthyology 23:177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Defoirdt T, Sorgeloos P, Bossier P (2011) Alternatives to antibiotics for the control of bacterial disease in aquaculture. Curr Opin Microbiol 14:251–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellis AE (1990) Serum antiproteases in fish. In: Stolen JS, Fletcher TC, Anderson DP, Roberson BS, van Muiswinkel WB (eds) Techniques in fish immunology. SOS Publications, Fair Haven, pp 95–99Google Scholar
  14. Forstner JF (1978) Intestinal mucins in health and disease. Digestion 17: 234–263. Publishing Policy and Support Branch, Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension, RomeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freccia A, Sousa SM, Meurer F, Butzge AJ, Mewes JK, Bombardelli RA (2014) Essential oils in the initial phase of broodstock diets of Nile tilapia. R Bras Zootec 43:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guerreiro I, Serra CR, Oliva-Teles A, Enes P (2018) Gut microbiota of European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) is modulated by short-chain fructooligo-saccharides and xylooligo-saccharides. Short communication. Aquacult Int 26:279–288.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-017-0220-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hassaan M, Wafa M, Soltan M, Goda A, Mogheth N (2014) Effect of dietary organic salts on growth, nutrient digestibility, mineral absorption and some biochemical indices of Nile tilapia; Oreochromis niloticus L. fingerlings. World Appl Sci J 29:47–55Google Scholar
  18. Hoseinifar SH, Zoheiri F, Caipang CM (2016) Dietary sodium propionate improved performance, mucosal and humoral immune responses in Caspian white fish (Rutilus frisii kutum) fry. Fish and Shellfish Immunology 55:523–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoseinifar SH, Sun YZ, Caipang CM (2017) Short chain fatty acids as feed supplements for sustainable aquaculture: an updated review. Review Article Aquaculture Research 48(4):1380–1391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hosseini E, Grootaert C, Verstraete W, Van de Wiele T (2011) Propionate as a health-promoting microbial metabolite in the human gut. Nutr Rev 69:245–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ISO, International Standard ISO 9308-1 (1990) Water Quality Detection and Enumeration of Coliform Organisms, Thermotolerant Coliform Organisms and Presumptive Escherichia coli. Part 1: Membrane Filtration Method. International Organization for Standardization. Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.iso.org/standard/16966.html
  22. Kawahara E, Ueda T, Nomura S (1991) In vitro phagocytic activity of white spotted shark cells after injection with Aeromonas salmonicida extracellular products. Gyobyo Kenkyu/Fish Pathol, Japan 26(4):213–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kobayashi T, Enomato S, Sakazaki R, Kuwahara S (1963) A new selective medium for pathogenic Vibrios TCBS agar (modified Nakanishi’s agar). Japanese J Bacteriology 18:387–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kousoulaki K, Sæther BS, Albrektsen S, Noble C (2015) Review on European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax, Linnaeus, 1758) nutrition and feed management: a practical guide for optimizing feed formulation and farming protocols. Aquac Nutr 21:129–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lückstädt C (2008a) The use of acidifiers in fish nutrition. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture. Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources. 3 (044): 1–8. https://www.cababstractsplus.org/cabreviews
  26. Lückstädt C (2008b) Effect of organic acid containing additives in worldwide aquaculture–sustainable production the non-antibiotic way: 71-77. In: Lückstüadt C (ed) Acidifiers in animal nutrition. A guide for feed preservation and acidification to promote animal performance. Nottingham University Press, NottinghamGoogle Scholar
  27. Magnadottír B (2006) Innate immunity of fish (overview). Fish and Shell fish Immunology 20:137–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Menanteau-Ledouble S, Krauss I, Gonçalves RA, Weber B, Santos GA, El-Matbouli M (2017) Antimicrobial effect of Biotronic® Top3 supplement and efficacy in protecting rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) from infection by Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida. Res Vet Sci, 114: 95-100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.03.010.
  29. Morken T, Kraugerud OF, Barrows FT, Sørensen M, Storebakken T, Øverland M (2011) Sodium diformate and extrusion temperature affect nutrient digestibility and physical quality of diets with fish meal and barley protein concentrate for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture 317:138–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ng WK, Koh CB (2016) The utilization and mode of action of organic acids in the feeds of cultured aquatic animals. Rev Aquac 0:1–27Google Scholar
  31. NRC (National Research Council) (2011) Nutrient requirements of fish and shrimp. National Council of the National Academies, Washington DC, p 376Google Scholar
  32. Partanen KH, Mroz Z (1999) Organic acids for performance enhancement in pig diets. Nutr Res Rev 12:117–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Piñeiro PS, Ferreiro UV, Calvar NE, Leal JM (Eds) (2013) New additives and ingredients in the formulation of aquafeeds. Centro Tecnológico del Mar Fundación CETMAR, Special Report, 81 ppGoogle Scholar
  34. Reda RM, Mahmoud R, Selim KM, El-Araby IE (2016) Effects of dietary acidifiers on growth, hematology, immune response and disease resistance of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Fish and Shellfish Immunology 50:255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rimoldi S, Finzi G, Ceccotti C, Girardello R, Grimaldi A, Ascione C, Terova G (2016) Butyrate and taurine exert a mitigating effect on the inflamed distal intestine of European sea bass fed with a high percentage of soybean meal. Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 19:19–40.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s41240-016-0041-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ringø E (1991) Effects of dietary lactate and propionate on growth and digesta in Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus (L.). Aquaculture 96:321–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ringo E, Zhou Z, Vecino JLG, Wadsworth S, Romero J, Krogdahl Å, Olsen RE, Dimitroglou A, Foey A, Daveis S, Owen M, Lauzon HL, Martinsen LL, De Schryver P, Bossier P, Sperstad S, Merrifield DL (2015) Effect of dietary components on the gut microbiota of aquatic animals. A never-endeng story? Aquac Nutr 22:1–42.  https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.12346 Google Scholar
  38. Safari R, Hoseinifar SH, Kavandi M (2016) Modulation of antioxidant defense and immune response in zebra fish (Danio rerio) using dietary sodium propionate. Fish Physiol Biochem 42:1733–1739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sahoo P, Kumari J, Mishra B (2005) Non-specific immune responses in juveniles of Indian major carps. J. App. Ichthyology 21(2):151–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sarker MSA, Satoh S, Kamata K, Haga Y, Yamamoto Y (2012) Supplementation effect(s) of organic acids and/or lipid to plant protein-based diets on juvenile yellowtail, Seriola quinqueradiata Temminck et Schlegel 1845, growth and, nitrogen and phosphorus excretion. Aquac Res 43:538–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Secombes CJ (1990) Isolation of salmonid macrophages and analysis of their killing activity. In: Stolen JS, Fletcher TC, Anderson DP, Roberson BS, Van Muiswinkel WB (eds) Techniques of fish immunology. SOS Publications, Fair Haven, pp 137–154 137e152Google Scholar
  42. Siwicki AK, Anderson DP (1993) Nonspecific defense mechanisms assay in fish: II. Potential killing activity of neutrophils and macrophages, lysozyme activity in serum and organs and total immunoglobulin (Ig) level in serum. In: Fish Disease Diagnosis and Prevention Methods. (Eds: Siwicki AK, Anderson DP and Waluga J). (Publ.,Wydawnictwo Instytutu Rybactwa Strodladowego) Olsztyn, Poland: 105-111Google Scholar
  43. Sun H, Jami E, Harpaz S, Mizrahi I (2013) Involvement of dietary salt in shaping bacterial communities in European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Sci Rep 3:1558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Van-Kampen EJ, Zijlstra WG (1961) Standardization of hemoglobin-metery. Clin.Chem.Acta 6:438–544Google Scholar
  45. Vázquez F, Muñoz-Cueto J (2014) Biology of European seabass. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang J, Qingyan T, Wang Z, Mai K, Xu W, Zhang Y, Ai Q (2017) Effects of fish meal replacement by soybean meal with supplementation of functional compound additives on intestinal morphology and microbiome of Japanese seabass (Lateolabrax japonicus). Aquacul Res 48:2186–2197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wassef EA, Abdel-Momen SA, Saleh NE, Al-Zayat AM, Ashry AM (2017) Is sodium diformate a beneficial feed supplement for European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax)? Effect on growth performance and health status. Egypt J Aquat Res 43:229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zobell CE (1946) Marine Microbiology. Chronica Botanica, Waltham, p 240Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fish Nutrition LaboratoryNational Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries (NIOF)AlexandriaEgypt
  2. 2.Zoology Department, Faculty of SciencesAlexandria UniversityAlexandriaEgypt
  3. 3.Microbiology Laboratory|National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries (NIOF)AlexandriaEgypt
  4. 4.Faculty of Agriculture, Saba BashaAlexandria UniversityAlexandriaEgypt

Personalised recommendations