Advertisement

Aquaculture International

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 1869–1882 | Cite as

Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) adaptation to a warmer climate: the performance of an improved strain under farm conditions

  • Sonia Alejandra CrichignoEmail author
  • Víctor Enrique Cussac
Article
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

The change registered in water temperature over recent years has represented a considerable challenge for the culture of salmonid fishes in terms of thermal stress. However, previous trials with Australian, Japanese, and Argentinean rainbow trout lines suggested that improvements in thermal performance might be possible. The aim of this work was to explore performance, i.e., the survival, malformations, food intake, growth, feed conversion efficiency, condition factor, thermal tolerance, and preferred temperature of a number of F1 families (wild thermal resistant male × farmed female) in order to formulate proposals for future work. The performances evaluated showed significant differences between F1 and control families, but no major heterogeneity within F1 families. The incidence of complex malformations, lower in F1 families than in controls, could indicate an advantage due to lower homozygosity. Thermal tolerance varied within F1 families but preferred temperature did not. Survival data suggested that chronic exposure to 20.5 °C had a lethal effect on control families. However, F1 families acclimated to 20.5 °C over a long period of time (ca. 109 days) preferred a mean temperature of 20.2 ± 0.2 °C, a final temperature preference substantially higher than those observed for other populations and strains of the species. Although growth differences between control and F1 families should be considered with caution, since no family was selected by growth in this work, it appears that simple selection by growth could be all that is necessary before beginning the process of introducing these families into farmed lines.

Keywords

Fish farming Growth Preferred temperature Rainbow trout Thermal tolerance 

Abbreviations

ANOVA

Analysis of variance

AT

Acclimation temperature

ATU

Accumulated thermal units

CENSALBA

Centro de Salmonicultura Bariloche

CF

Condition factor

DA

Discriminant analysis

DF

Discriminant function

FCE

Feed conversion efficiency

GR

Growth rate

LET

Loss of equilibrium temperature

MAAT

Mean annual air temperature

MSAT

Mean summer air temperature

MSGR

Mass-specific growth rate

PT

Preferred temperature

R

Ration

SL

Standard length

W

Weight

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the collaboration of Mabel Orellana, Rodrigo Larraza, and Guillermo Mirenna from the Centro de Salmonicultura Bariloche, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Argentina. This work was supported by Universidad Nacional del Comahue (04B181 and B204), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (PIP 11220120100063CO), and Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT-2013-2640) of Argentina.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed by the authors.

References

  1. Aigo J, Lattuca M, Cussac V (2014) Susceptibility of native perca (Percichthys trucha) and exotic rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to high temperature in Patagonia: different physiological traits and distinctive responses. Hydrobiology 736:73–82.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-1888-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Báez V, Aigo J, Cussac V (2011) Climate change and fish culture in Patagonia: present situation and perspectives. Aquac Res 42:787–796.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.02804.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balon E (1990) Epigenesis of an epigeneticist: the development of some alternative concepts on the early ontogeny and evolution of fishes. GIR 1:1–42Google Scholar
  4. Bettoli P, Neill W, Kelsh S (1985) Temperature preference and heat resistance of grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella (Valenciennes), bighead carp, Hypophthalmichthys mobilis (Gray), and their F1 hybrid. J Fish Biol 27:239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boglione C, Gavaia P, Koumoundouros G, Gisbert E, Moren M, Fontagné S, Witten PE (2013) Skeletal anomalies in reared European fish larvae and juveniles. Part 1: normal and anomalous skeletogenic processes. Rev Aquacult 5:99–120.  https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boglione C, Pulcini D, Scardi M, Palamara E, Russo T, Cataudella S (2014) Skeletal anomaly monitoring in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum 1792) reared under different conditions. PLoS One 9:e96983.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096983 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonnet E, Fostier A, Bobe J (2007) Characterization of rainbow trout egg quality: a case study using four different breeding protocols, with emphasis on the incidence of embryonic malformations. Theriogenology 67:786–794.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.10.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Burgos-Alvarado M (1999) Malformaciones encontradas en alevines de salmon del atlántico (Salmo salar) provenientes de ovas nacionales e importadas en una piscicultura de la Decima Region, Chile. Dissertation, Universidad Austral de Chile. http://cybertesis.uach.cl/tesis/uach/1999/fvb957m/doc/fvb957m.pdf. Accessed 7/19/2019
  9. Chen Z, Snow M, Lawrence C et al (2015) Selection for upper thermal tolerance in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum). J Exp Biol 218:803–812.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.113993 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Crichigno S, Becker L, Orellana M et al (2018) Rainbow trout adaptation to a warmer Patagonia and its potential to increase temperature tolerance in cultured stocks. Aquacult Rep 9:82–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2017.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crozier L, Hutchings J (2014) Plastic and evolutionary responses to climate change in fish. Evol Appl 7:68–87.  https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12135 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Darlington PJ (1957) Zoogeography: The geographical distribution of animals. John Wiley and sons, Nueva YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellender B, Rivers-Moore N, Coppinger C et al (2016) Towards using thermal stress thresholds to predict salmonid invasion potential. Biol Invasions 18:3513–3525.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1244-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elliot J (1981) Some aspects of thermal stress on freshwater teleosts. In: Pickering A (ed) Stress and fish. Academic Press, London, pp 209–245Google Scholar
  15. Estay F, Rivers-Moore N, Coppinger C et al. (1995). Manejo reproductivo de salmónidos. Bases biológicas y manejo de un stock de peces reproductores. Serie de Publicaciones en Acuicultura. No. 2, FUNCAP, ChileGoogle Scholar
  16. Fitzsimmons S, Perutz M (2006) Effects of egg incubation temperature on survival, prevalence and types of malformations in vertebral column of Atlantic Cod (Gadus morhua) larvae. Bull Eur Ass Fish Pathol 26:80–86Google Scholar
  17. Fry F (1971) Effects of environmental factors on the physiology of fish. In: Hoar W, Randall D (eds) Fish physiology, vol 6. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–98Google Scholar
  18. Gislason H, Karstensen H, Christiansen D, Hjelde K, Helland S, Bæverfjord G (2010) Rib and vertebral deformities in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) explained by a dominant-mutation mechanism. Aquaculture 309:86–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.09.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ineno T, Tsuchida S, Kanda M et al (2005) Thermal tolerance of a rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss strain selected by high-temperature breeding. Fish. Sci. 71:767–775.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-2906.2005.01026.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ineno T, Endo M, Watabe S (2008) Differences in self-feeding activity between thermally selected and normal strains of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss at high temperatures. Fish. Sci. 74:372–379.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-2906.2008.01534.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ineno T, Tamaki K, Yamada K, Kodama R, Tsuchida S, Tan E, Kinoshita S, Muto K, Yada T, Kitamura S, Asakawa S, Watabe S (2018) Thermal tolerance of a thermally selected strain of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss and the pedigrees of its F1 and F2 generations indicated by their critical thermal maxima. Fish. Sci. 84:671–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jobling M (1981) Temperature tolerance and the final preferendum-rapid methods for the assessment of optimum growth temperatures. J Fish Biol 19:439–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jobling M, Tveiten H, Hatlen B (1998) Cultivation of Artic charr: an update. Aquacult Int 6:181–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kullgren A, Jutfelt F, Fontanillas R, Sundell K, Samuelsson L, Wiklander K, Kling P, Koppe W, Larsson DGJ, Björnsson BT, Jönsson E (2013) The impact of temperature on the metabolome and endocrine metabolic signals in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Comp Biochem Physiol A 164:44–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lahnsteiner F, Patzner R (2002) Rainbow trout egg quality determination by the relative weight increase during hardening: a practical standardization. J Appl Ichthyol 18:24–26.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0426.2002.00289.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Le Bihanic F, Morin B, Cousin X et al (2014) Developmental toxicity of PAH mixtures in fish early life stages. Part I: adverse effects in rainbow trout. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:13720–13731.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2804-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leitritz E (1959) Trout and salmon culture (hatchery methods). State Of California Department Of Fish And Game. Fish Bulletin No. 107Google Scholar
  28. McNab B (2002) The physiological ecology of vertebrates. A view from energetics. Cornell University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Molony B (2001) Environmental requirements and tolerances of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) with special reference to Western Australia: a review. Fish Res Rep 130:1–28Google Scholar
  30. Molony B, Church A, Maguire G (2004) A comparison of the heat tolerance and growth of a selected and non-selected line of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss, in Western Australia. Aquaculture 241:655–665.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.08.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morrissy N (1973) Comparison of strains of Salmo gairdneri Richardson from New South Wales, Victoria and Western Australia. Bull Austral Soc Limnol 5:11–20Google Scholar
  32. Morrone J (2002) Biogeographical regions under track and cladistic scrutiny. J Biogeogr 29:149–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morrone JJ (2004) The south american transition zone: characterization and evolutionary relevance. Acta Ent. Chilena, 28(1), 41–50Google Scholar
  34. Narum S, Campbell N, Meyer K et al (2013) Thermal adaptation and acclimation of ectotherms from differing aquatic climates. Mol Ecol 22:3090–3097.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12240 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Norusis M (1986) SPSS/PC+ advanced statistics. SPSS Inc, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  36. Oku H, Tokuda M, Matsunari H, Furuita H, Murashita K, Yamamoto T (2014) Characterization of differentially expressed genes in liver in response to the rearing temperature of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss and their heritable differences. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 40:1757–1769.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-014-9965-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Paladino F, Spotila J, Schubauer J et al (1980) The critical thermal maximum: a technique used to elucidate physiological stress and adaptation in fishes. Rev Can Biol 39:115–122Google Scholar
  38. Pankhurst N, Purser G, van der Kraak G et al (1996) Effect of holding temperature on ovulations, egg fertility, plasma levels of reproductive hormones and in vitro ovarian steroidogenesis in the rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquaculture 146:277–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Power G (1980) The brook charr Salvelinus fontinalis. In: Balon E (ed) Charrs: salmonid fishes of the genus Salvelinus. Dr W Junk, The Hague, pp 141–204Google Scholar
  40. Roze T, Christen F, Amerand A, Claireaux G (2013) Trade-off between thermal sensitivity, hypoxia tolerance and growth in fish. J Therm Biol 38:98–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2012.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tymchuk W, Devlin R (2005) Growth differences among first and second generation hybrids of domesticated and wild rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture 245:295–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Verhille C, English K, Cocherell D et al (2016) High thermal tolerance of a rainbow trout population near its southern range limit suggests local thermal adjustment. Conserv Physiol 4:cow057.  https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/cow057 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Von Bayer C (1950) Reprint: a method of measuring fish eggs. Prog Fish Cult 12:105–107 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1577/1548-8640%281950%2912%5B105%3ARMOMFE%5D2.0.CO%3B2?journalCode=uzpf20. Accessed 7/19/2019
  44. Zelennikov OV, Golod VM (2019) Gametogenesis of rainbow trout Parasalmo mykiss cultivated from hatching to sexual maturity at a temperature of approximately 20°С. J Ichthyol 59:78–89.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032945219010181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang Y, Healy T, Vandersteen W et al (2018) A rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss strain with higher aerobic scope in normoxia also has superior tolerance of hypoxia. J Fish Biol 92:487–503.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13530 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sonia Alejandra Crichigno
    • 1
    Email author
  • Víctor Enrique Cussac
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto Patagónico de Tecnologías Biológicas y Geoambientales (IPATEC)Universidad Nacional del Comahue (UNCO) – Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)BarilocheArgentina

Personalised recommendations