Aquaculture International

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 1291–1301 | Cite as

Evaluation of different hydroponic media for mint (Mentha arvensis) with common carp (Cyprinus carpio) juveniles in an aquaponic system

  • A.P. Shete
  • A.K. Verma
  • N. K. Chadha
  • Chandra Prakash
  • M.H. Chandrakant
  • K. K. T. Nuwansi
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Three hydroponic media crushed stones (T1), river stones (T2), and floating raft (T3) were compared in an aquaponic system with common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and mint (Mentha arvensis). Fish effluents were used as plant nutrients while plants filtered water by stripping off the nutrients before returning to the fish tank. Fish growth, plant growth, and water quality parameters were used to evaluate the suitability of three different media. Growth performance of common carp and mint followed the relationship of crushed stones > floating raft > river stones with significant difference observed among all treatments. Total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) removal varied significantly among different treatments. The maximum TAN removal was observed in T1 (77.13%) followed by T3 (69.65%), and the minimum removal was observed in T2 (48.82%). Nitrate removal varied significantly among different treatments. The highest removal was observed in T1 (82.95%) followed by T3 (68.04%) and T2 (59.51%). Removal of phosphate was significantly lower in T2 (50.12%) when compared to T1 (67.85%) and T3 (70.71%). Biofilter performance (g m−3 day−1) of T2 (4.80) was significantly lower compared to T1 (7.13) and T3 (7.37). Crushed stone and floating raft were significantly efficient when compared to river stone medium in terms of nutrient removal and water quality maintenance for the fish culture. Considering all growth parameters, crushed stone media proved to be better when compared to other two media. Thus, medium selection could be a considerable factor when designing an aquaponic system.

Key words

Aquaponics Crushed stone River stones Floating raft Common carp Mint 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the Director/Vice-Chancellor, ICAR—Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai, India, for supporting this study technically and financially.

References

  1. Adler PR, Harper JK, Takeda F, Wade EM, Summerfelt ST (2000) Economic evaluation of hydroponics and other treatment options for phosphorus removal in aquaculture effluents. Horticulture Science 35(6):993–999Google Scholar
  2. Al-Hafedh YS, Alam A, Beltagi MS (2008) Food production and water conservation in a recirculating aquaponic system in Saudi Arabia at different ratios of fish feed to plants. J World Aquaculture Society J39(4):510–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. APHA (2005) Standards methods for the examination of water and waste water, 21st edn Washington D. C Google Scholar
  4. Bohl M (1977) Some initial aquaculture experiments in recirculating water systems. Aquaculture 11:323–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buzby KM, Lin LS (2014) Scaling aquaponic systems: balancing plant uptake with fish output. Aquac Eng 63:39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins M, Gratzek J, Shotts E Jr, Dawe D, Campbell L, Senn D (1975) Nitrification in an aquatic recirculating system. J Fish Res Board Can 32:2025–2031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dediu L, Cristea V, Xiaoshuan Z (2012) Waste production and valorization in an integrated aquaponic system with bester and lettuce. African J Biotechnology 11(9):2349–2358Google Scholar
  8. Diver S (2006) Aquaponics-integration of hydroponics with aquaculture. National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service.Google Scholar
  9. Dontje JH, Clanton CJ (1999) Nutrient fate in aquaculture systems for waste treatment. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 42(4):1073–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Endut A, Jusoh A, Ali N, Wan Nik WB, Hassan A (2010) A study on the optimal hydraulic loading rate and plant ratios in recirculation aquaponic system. Bioresour Technol 101:1511–1517CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Endut A, Jusoh A, Ali N, Wan Nik WNS, Hassan A (2009) Effect of flow rate on water quality parameters and plant growth of water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) in an aquaponic recirculating system. Desalin Water Treat 5:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Franco-Nava MV, Blancheton JP, Deviller G, Charrier A, Le-Gall JY (2004) Effect of fish size and hydraulic regime on particulate organic matter dynamics in a recirculating aquaculture system, elemental carbon and nitrogen approach. Aquaculture 239:179–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghaly AE, Kamal M, Mahmoud NS (2005) Phytoremediation of aquaculture wastewater for water recycling and production of fish feed. Environ Int 31:1–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Graves CJ (1993) The nutrient film technique. Horticult Rev 5:1–44Google Scholar
  15. Hamlin HJ (2006) Nitrate toxicity in Siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baeri). Aquaculture 253(1–4):688–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hussain T, Verma AK, Tiwari VK, Prakash C, Rathore G, Shete AP, Saharan N (2015) Effect of water flow rates on growth of Cyprinus carpio var. koi (Cyprinus carpio L, 1758) and spinach plant in aquaponic system. Aquac Int 23:369–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hussain T, Verma AK, Tiwari VK, Prakash C, Rathore G, Shete AP, KKT N (2014) Optimizing koi carp, Cyprinus carpio var. Koi (Linnaeus, 1758), stocking density and nutrient recycling with spinach in an aquaponic system. J World Aquaculture Society 45(6):652–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lennard WA, Leonard BV (2004) A comparison of reciprocating flow versus constant flow in an integrated, gravel bed, aquaponic test system. Aquac Int 12(6):539–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lennard WA, Leonard BV (2006) A comparison of three different hydroponic sub-systems (gravel bed, floating and nutrient film technique) in an aquaponic test system. Aquac Int 14:539–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lewis WM, Yopp JH, Schramm HL, Brandenburg AM (1978) Use of hydroponics to maintain quality of recirculated water in a fish culture system. Transaction of the American Fisheries Society 107(1):92–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liao P, Mayo R (1974) Intensified fish culture combining water reconditioning with pollution abatement. Aquaculture 3:61–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lin YF, Jing SR, Lee DY, Wang TW (2002) Nutrient removal from aquaculture wastewater using a constructed wetlands system. Aquaculture 209:169–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Masser MP, Rakocy J, Losordo TM (1999) Recirculating aquaculture tank production systems—management of recirculating systems. SRAC Publication No. 452 USDA, pp. 12.Google Scholar
  24. McMurtry MR, Sanders DC, Cure JD, Hodson RG, Haning BC, St. Amand PC (1997) Efficiency of water use of an integrated fish/vegetable co-culture system. J World Aquaculture Society 28:420–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McMurtry MR, Sanders DC, Patterson RP, Nash A (1993) Yield of tomato irrigated with recirculating aquaculture water. J Prod Agric 6:429–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Naegel LCA (1977) Combined production of fish and plants in recirculating water. Aquaculture 10:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Neocleous D, Polycarpou P (2010) Gravel for soilless tomato culture in the Mediterranean region. International J Vegetable Science 16(2):148–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nijhof M, Bovendeur J (1995) Fixed film nitrification characteristics in sea water recirculation fish culture systems. Aquaculture 87(2):133–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nuwansi KKT, Verma AK, Prakash C, Tiwari VK, Chandrakant MH, Shete AP, Prabhath GPWA (2015) Effect of water flow rate on polyculture of koi carp (Cyprinus carpio var. koi) and goldfish (Carassius auratus) with water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) in recirculating aquaponic system. Aquac Int 24:385–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rakocy JE (1995) Aquaponics: the integration of fish and vegetables culture in recirculating system. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Caribbean Food Crops Society (ed. Palada M. C. and Clarke, C. C). University of Virgin Islands COOP Extension Service, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands, USA, pp 101–108Google Scholar
  31. Rakocy JE (1999) The status of aquaponics. Part 2. Aquac Mag 25:64–70Google Scholar
  32. Rakocy JE, Bailey DS, Shultz C, Thoman ES (2004) Update on tilapia and vegetable production in the uvi aquaponic system. University of the Virgin islands Agricultural Experiment Station, Kingshill, USA, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  33. Rakocy JE, Hargreaves JA (1993) Integration of vegetable hydroponics with fish culture. In: Techniques for modern aquaculture (ed. Wang, J. K.)St. Joseph, Mi-USA, American Society of Agricultural Engineers 112–136.Google Scholar
  34. Rakocy JE, Hargreaves JA, Bailey DS (2006) Recirculating aquaculture tank production systems: aquaponics—integrating fish and plant culture. SRAC Publication, 454 USDA.Google Scholar
  35. Rijn JV (1995) The potential for integrated biological treatment systems in recirculating fish culture—a review. Aquaculture 139:181–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roque d’Orbcastel E, Person-Le-Ruyet J, Le Bayon N, Blancheton JP (2009) Comparative growth and welfare in rainbow trout reared in recirculating and flow through rearing system. Aquaculture Engineering 40:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rychly J (1980) Nitrogen balance in trout II. Nitrogen excretion and retention after feeding diets with varying protein and carbohydrate levels. Aquaculture 20:343–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Salam M, Asadujjaman M, Rahman MS (2013) Aquaponics for improving high density fish pond water quality through raft and rack vegetable production. World J Fish and Marine Sciences 5(3):251–256Google Scholar
  39. Seawright DE, Stickney RR, Walker RB (1998) Nutrient dynamics in integrated aquaculture- hydroponics systems. Aquaculture 160:215–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shete AP, Verma AK, Kohli MPS, Dash P, Tandel RS (2013) Optimization of stocking density for goldfish, Carassius auratus (Linnaeus, 1758) under aquaponic system. The Israeli J Aquaculture–Bamidgeh IJA_65.2013.910, pp. 7.Google Scholar
  41. Shete AP, Verma AK, Tandel RS, Prakash C, Tiwari VK, Hussain T (2014) Optimization of water circulation period for the culture of goldfish with spinach in aquaponic system. J Agricultural Sci 5(4):26–30Google Scholar
  42. Sikawa DC, Yakupitiyage A (2010) The hydroponic production of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L) by using hybrid catfish (Clarias macrocephalus X C. gariepinus) pond water: potentials and constraints. Agric Water Manag 97:1317–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sneed K, Allen K, Ellis J (1975) Fish farming and hydroponics. Aquac Fish Farmer 2:18–20Google Scholar
  44. Sutton RJ, Lewis WM (1982) Further observations on a fish production system that incorporates hydroponically grown plants. The Progressive Fish-Culturist 44(1):55–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tyson RV, Simonne EH, White JM, Lamb EM (2004) Reconciling water quality parameters impacting nitrification in aquaponics: the pH levels. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society 117:79–83Google Scholar
  46. Watten BJ, Busch RL (1984) Tropical production of tilapia (Sarotherodon aurea) and tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum) in a small scale recirculating water system. Aquaculture 41:271–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wurts WA (1993) Understanding water hardness. World Aquaculture 24(5):18–21Google Scholar
  48. Wurts WA, Durborow RM (1992) Interactions of pH, carbon dioxide, alkalinity and hardness in fish ponds. SRAC Publication 464:1–4Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • A.P. Shete
    • 1
  • A.K. Verma
    • 1
  • N. K. Chadha
    • 1
  • Chandra Prakash
    • 1
  • M.H. Chandrakant
    • 1
  • K. K. T. Nuwansi
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Institute of Fisheries EducationAndheri (W)India

Personalised recommendations