Aquaculture International

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 539–551 | Cite as

Self-thinning dynamics in experimental scallop populations

  • Marcel Fréchette
  • José Manuel Urquiza
  • Gaétan Daigle
  • Dominique Maheux
  • Jean-François Dumais
Article

Abstract

Self-thinning-related mortality has been encountered in extensively cultured scallop populations. Here we report an experiment aimed at studying actual population dynamics of scallops undergoing self-thinning and develop a model of the process. Scallops were kept in small tanks at various initial population densities. Growth and survival were monitored for 39 months. Two cohorts were monitored (cohorts 1 and 2 were 1 and 2 years old, respectively). Growth was density-dependent in cohort 2. Survivorship was high in cohort 1 during the first summer but mass mortality occurred during the second summer. Mortality in cohort 2 peaked during the first summer. In both cohorts, peak mortality occurred at age 2+ years and thus was uncoupled among cohorts. Therefore, negative environmental factors are ruled out as explanations of mortality. Instead, it appears as if self-thinning interacted with some ontogenetic factor. Although cohort 1 was undergoing self-thinning, trends in biomass–density curves were non-monotonous because of mass mortality. In contrast, self-thinning in cohort 2 followed a classical pattern. One possible mechanism for such contrasting differences was that 1+-year-old scallops produced byssal threads and attached to one another during the first year, forming multilayered clumps. This behaviour disappeared during the second year and mass mortality was experienced as scallops adopted a single-layered arrangement. Although details may differ among species, the process depicted above provides a potential trigger to the sequence of events leading to mass mortality in scallop culture. Our model suggests that self-thinning occurred in all density groups, with a common slope but with different elevations in the biomass–density space.

Keywords

Placopecten magellanicus Scallop Self-thinning Stocking density 

References

  1. Alunno-Bruscia M, Petraitis PS, Bourget E, Fréchette M (2000) Body size-density relationships for Mytilus edulis in an experimental food-regulated situation. Oikos 90:28–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aoyama S (1989) The Mutsu Bay scallop fisheries: scallop culture, stock enhancement, and resource management. In: Caddy JF (ed) Marine invertebrate fisheries: their assessment and management. J. Wiley, New York, pp 525–539Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong JD (1997) Self-thinning in juvenile sea-trout and other salmonid fishes revisited. J Anim Ecol 66:519–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baba K, Miyazono A, Matsuyama K, Kohno S, Kubota S (2007) Occurrence and detrimental effects of the bivalve-inhabiting hydroid Eutima japonica on juveniles of the Japanese scallop Mizuhopecten yessoensis in Funka Bay, Japan: relationship to juvenile massive mortality in 2003. Mar Biol 151:1977–1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bégin É, Bégin J, Bélanger L, Rivest L-P, Tremblay S (2001) Balsam fir self-thinning relationship and its constancy among different ecological regions. Can J For Res 31:950–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bi H (2001) The self-thinning surface. For Sci 47:361–370Google Scholar
  7. Branch GM (1975) Intraspecific competition in Patella cochlear Born. J Anim Ecol 44:263–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bricelj VM, Connell L, Konoki K, Macquarrie SP, Scheuer T, Catterall WA, Trainer VL (2005) Sodium channel mutation leading to saxitoxin resistance in clams increases risk of PSP. Nature 434:763–767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cao QV, Dean TJ, Baldwin VCJ (2000) Modeling the size—density relationship in direct-seeded slash pine stands. For Sci 46:317–321Google Scholar
  10. Cigarría J, Fernández J (1998) Manila clam (Ruditapes philippinarum) culture in oyster bags: influence of density on survival, growth and biometric relationships. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 78:551–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cliche G, Vigneau S, Giguère M (1997) Status of a commercial sea scallop enhancement project in Îles-de-la-Madeleine (Québec, Canada). Aquacult Int 5:259–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Côté J, Himmelman JH, Claereboudt M, Bonardelli JC (1993) Influence of density and depth on the growth of juvenile sea scallops (Placopecten magellanicus) in suspended culture. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:1857–1869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Demers S, Therriault J-C, Bourget E, Bah A (1987) Resuspension in the shallow sublittoral zone of a macrotidal estuarine environment: wind influence. Limnol Oceanogr 32:327–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunham JB, Dickerson BR, Beever E, Duncan RD, Vinyard GL (2000) Effects of food limitation and emigration on self-thinning in experimental minnow cohorts. J Anim Ecol 69:927–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elliott JM (1993) The self-thinning rule applied to juvenile sea-trout, Salmo trutta. J Anim Ecol 62:371–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Filgueira R, Peteiro LG, Labarta U, Fernández-Reiriz MJ (2008) The self-thinning rule applied to cultured populations in aggregate growth matrices. J Molluscan Stud 74:415–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fréchette M (2010) Hierarchical structure of bivalve culture systems and optimal stocking density. Aquacult Int 18:99–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fréchette M, Bourget E (1985) Energy flow between the pelagic and benthic zones: factors controlling particulate organic matter available to an intertidal mussel bed. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 42:1158–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fréchette M, Grant J (1991) An in situ estimation of the effect of wind-driven resuspension on the growth of the mussel Mytilus edulis L. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 148:201–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fréchette M, Lefaivre D (1990) Discriminating between food and space limitation in benthic suspension feeders using self-thinning relationships. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 65:15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fréchette M, Bergeron P, Gagnon P (1996) On the use of self-thinning relationships in stocking experiments. Aquaculture 145:91–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fréchette M, Gaudet M, Vigneau S (2000) Estimating optimal population density for intermediate culture of scallops in spat collector bags. Aquaculture 183:105–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fréchette M, Alunno-Bruscia M, Dumais J-F, Daigle G, Sirois R (2005) Incompleteness and statistical uncertainty in competition/stocking experiments. Aquaculture 246:209–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Giguère M, Cliche G, Brulotte S (1994) Reproductive cycles of the sea scallop, Placopecten magellanicus (Gmelin), and the Iceland scallop, Chlamys islandica (O. F. Müller), in Îles-de-la-Madeleine, Canada. J Shellfish Res 13:31–36Google Scholar
  25. Guiñez R, Castilla JC (1999) A tridimensional self-thinning model for multilayered intertidal mussels. Am Nat 154:341–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guiñez R, Castilla JC (2001) An allometric tridimensional model of self-thinning for a gregarious tunicate. Ecology 82:2331–2341Google Scholar
  27. Guiñez R, Petraitis PS, Castilla JC (2005) Layering, the effective density of mussels and mass-density boundary curves. Oikos 110:186–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hagihara A (1999) Theoretical considerations on the C–D effect in self-thinning plant populations. Res Popul Ecol 41:151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Halley JM, Inchausti P (2004) The increasing importance of 1/f-noises as models of ecological variability. Fluctuation Noise Lett 4:R1–R26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hughes RN, Griffiths CL (1988) Self-thinning in barnacles and mussels: the geometry of packing. Am Nat 132:484–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Keeley ER (2003) An experimental analysis of self-thinning in juvenile steelhead trout. Oikos 102:543–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kikuzawa K (1999) Theoretical relationships between mean plant size, size distribution and self-thinning under one-sided competition. Ann Bot 83:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lachance-Bernard M, Himmelman JH, Daigle G, Fréchette M (2010) Biomass-density relationships and self-thinning of blue mussels (Mytilus spp.) reared on self-regulated long lines. Aquaculture 308:34–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Latto J (1994) Evidence for a self-thinning rule in animals. Oikos 69:531–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lauzon-Guay J-S, Barbeau M, Watmough J, Hamilton DJ (2006) Model for growth and survival of mussels, Mytilus edulis, reared in Prince Edward Island, Canada. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 16:171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lobón-Cerviá J (2008) Habitat quality enhances spatial variation in the self-thinning patterns of stream-resident brown trout (Salmo trutta). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 65:2006–2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. MacDonald BA, Thompson RJ (1985) Influence of temperature and food availability on the ecological energetics of the giant scallop Placopecten magellanicus. II. Reproductive output and total production. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 25:295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Melià P, Gatto M (2005) A stochastic bioeconomic model for the management of clam farming. Ecol Model 184:163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mori K (1975) Seasonal variation in physiological activity of scallops under culture in the coastal waters of Sanriku district, Japan, and a physiological approach of a possible cause of their mass mortality. Bull Mar Biol Stn Asamushi 15:59–79Google Scholar
  40. Nash RDM, Geffen AJ, Burrows MT, Gibson RN (2007) Dynamics of shallow-water juvenile flatfish nursery grounds: application of the self-thinning rule. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 344:231–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Newton PF (2006) Asymptotic size—density relationships within self-thinning black spruce and jack pine stand-types: parameter estimation and model reformulations. For Ecol Manag 226:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Osawa A (1995) Inverse relationship of crown fractal dimension to self-thinning exponent of tree populations: a hypothesis. Can J For Res 25:1608–1617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parsons JG, Dadswell MJ (1992) Effect of stocking density on growth, production, and survival of the giant scallop, Placopecten magellanicus, held in intermediate culture in Passamaquoddy Bay, New Brunswick. Aquaculture 103:291–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Petraitis PS (1995) The role of growth in maintaining spatial dominance by mussels (Mytilus edulis). Ecology 76:1337–1346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pretzsch H (2006) Species-specific allometric scaling under self-thinning: evidence from long-term plots in forest stands. Oecologia (Berl) 146:572–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Qin C, Dong S, Tan F, Tian X, Wang F, Dong Y, Gao Q (2009) Optimization of stocking density for the sea cucumber, Apostichopus japonicus Selenka, under feed-supplement and non-feed-supplement regimes in pond culture. J Ocean Univ China 8:296–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Quince C, Abrams PA, Shuter BJ, Lester NP (2008) Biphasic growth in fish I: theoretical foundations. J Theor Biol 254:197–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Raulier F, Pothier D, Bernier PY (2003) Predicting the effect of thinning on growth of dense balsam fir stands using a process-based tree growth model. Can J For Res 33:509–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reynolds JH, Ford ED (2005) Improving competition representation in theoretical models of self-thinning: a critical review. J Ecol 93:362–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rincón PA, Lobón-Cerviá J (2002) Non-linear self-thinning in a stream-resident population of brown trout (Salmo trutta). Ecology 83:1808–1816Google Scholar
  51. Shinozaki K, Kira T (1956) Intraspecific competition among higher plants VII. Logistic theory of the C–D effect. J Biol Osaka City Univ 7:35–72Google Scholar
  52. Steingrímsson SÓ, Grant JWA (1999) Allometry of territory size and metabolic rate as predictors of self-thinning in young-of-the year Atlantic salmon. J Anim Ecol 68:17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stokesbury KDE, Harris BP, Marino MCI, Nogueira JI (2007) Sea scallop mass mortality in a marine protected area. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 349:151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Therriault J-C, Levasseur M (1985) Control of phytoplankton production in the lower St. Lawrence Estuary: light and freshwater runoff. Nat Can 112:77–96Google Scholar
  55. Uki N (2006) Stock enhancement of the Japanese scallop Patinopecten yessoensis in Hokkaido. Fish Res 80:62–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ventilla RF (1982) The scallop industry in Japan. Adv Mar Biol 20:309–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Westoby M (1984) The self-thinning rule. Adv Ecol Res 14:167–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wildish D, Kristmanson D (1997) Benthic suspension feeders and flow. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Xiao J, Ford SE, Yang H, Zhang G, Zhang F, Guo X (2005) Studies on mass summer mortality of cultured zhikong scallops (Chlamys farreri Jones et Preston) in China. Aquaculture 250:602–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Xue L, Hagihara A (1998) Growth analysis of the self-thinning stands of Pinus densiflora Sieb. et Zucc. Ecol Res 13:183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yoda K, Kira T, Ogawa H, Hozumi K (1963) Self-thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions (Intraspecific competition among higher plants XI). J Biol Osaka City Univ 14:107–129Google Scholar
  62. Yu Z, Yang H, Liu B, Xing K, Zhang L, Xu K (2010) Survival, growth and immune activity of scallop Chlamys farreri cultured at different depths in Haizhou Bay (Yellow Sea, China) during hot season. Chin J Oceanol Limnol 28:498–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhang X, Zhu M, Li R, Wang Z, Xia B, Zhang L (2006) Density-dependent mortality of the scallop Chlamys farreri (Jones & Peterson) in grow-out culture. Aquac Res 37:842–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhang J, Fang J, Wang W, Xue S, Jiang Z (2011) Study on the potential of suspended longline mariculture of the scallop Chlamys farreri in offshore areas. Aquac Res 42:1664–1675CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcel Fréchette
    • 1
  • José Manuel Urquiza
    • 2
  • Gaétan Daigle
    • 2
  • Dominique Maheux
    • 2
  • Jean-François Dumais
    • 3
  1. 1.Ministère des Pêches et des OcéansInstitut Maurice-LamontagneMont-JoliCanada
  2. 2.Département de Mathématiques et de Statistique, Faculté des Sciences et de génieUniversité Laval, Pavillon Alexandre-VachonQuébecCanada
  3. 3.ISMERUniversité du Québec à RimouskiRimouskiCanada

Personalised recommendations