Uranyl Retention on Quartz—New Experimental Data and Blind Prediction Using an Existing Surface Complexation Model
- 166 Downloads
The adsorption behaviour of uranyl onto seven different samples of quartz was studied in batch experiments. Sea-sand (0.1–0.3 mm), Fil-Pro 12/20 (1–2 mm) and five Min-U-Sil samples with smaller particle sizes (5, 10, 15, 30 and 40 μm) were used. The uptake curves show “pH adsorption edges” in the range of pH 4–5. A good agreement of the new data with literature data was found when plotting surface-normalised distribution coefficients versus pH. Differences in the adsorption behaviour for pre-treated and untreated sea-sand samples were detectable resulting in a shift of the pH edge to higher pH values after treatment. A literature surface complexation model was applied for blind predictions of the experimental results. The simulations described the experimental observations quite well for the Min-U-Sil samples. For the two coarser quartz samples, the calculated over-predictions were explained by the larger-than-expected measured specific surface area and measurable amounts of associated minerals, for Fil-Pro 12/20 and sea-sand, respectively. Dissolution of the samples was studied as a function of pH. After 5 days, the measured Si concentrations were all higher than equilibrium quartz solubilities, but lower than those of amorphous silica. With increasing pH, dissolved silica increased. This strongly suggests that formation of dissolved uranyl–silicato complexes have to be considered based on measured silica concentrations.
KeywordsSurface complexation model Adsorption Batch experiments Uranium (VI)
We thank A. Kaufmann and F. Geyer for ICP-MS analysis, D. Schild for XPS measurements, T. Kisely for BET analysis (all of them from INE) and T. Wiss and H. Thiele (both JRC-ITU) for EDX and SEM investigations. A thorough reading of the manuscript by Dr. B. Kienzler (INE) is gratefully acknowledged.
- Davis JA (ed) (2001) Surface complexation modeling of uranium(VI) adsorption on natural mineral assemblages, Report NUREG/CR-6708, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission W D.C.Google Scholar
- Gabriel U, Charlet L, Schläpfer CW (2001) In situ speciation of uranium (VI) at the silica–water interface: a combined TRLFS and surface complexation study. In: Hellmann R, Wood SA (eds) Water–rock interactions, ore deposits, and environmental geochemistry: a tribute to David A. Crerar. Geochemical Society, St. Louis, Spec. Publ. No. 7Google Scholar
- Grenthe I, Fuger J, Konings RJM, Lemire RJ, Muller AB, Nguyen-Trung C, Wanner H (1992) Chemical thermodynamics of uranium. Elsevier Science, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Iler K (1979) The chemistry of silica: solubility, polymerization, colloid and surface properties and biochemistry. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Keizer MG, van Riemsdijk WH (1998) ECOSAT: technical report of the department of soil science and plant nutrition, Wageningen agricultural. University of Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- NEA (2003) Vol. 5. Update on the chemical thermodynamics of uranium, neptunium, plutonium, americium and technetium. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Riese AC (1982) Adsorption of radium and thorium onto quartz and kaolinite: A comparison of solution/surface equilibria models. Ph. D. dissertation, Colorado School of MinesGoogle Scholar
- Vuceta J (1976) Adsorption of Pb(II) and Cu(II) on α-quartz from aqueous solutions: influence of pH, ionic strength and complexing ligands. Ph. D. dissertation, Calif. Inst. of Technol., PasadenaGoogle Scholar