Gene expression profiling reveals two separate mechanisms regulating apoptosis in rectal carcinomas in vivo
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- de Bruin, E.C., van de Pas, S., van de Velde, C.J.H. et al. Apoptosis (2007) 12: 1671. doi:10.1007/s10495-007-0088-2
- 395 Downloads
The level of apoptosis in rectal carcinomas of patients treated by surgery only predicts local failure; patients with intrinsically high-apoptotic tumors develop less local recurrences than patients with low levels of apoptosis. To identify genes involved in this intrinsic apoptotic process in vivo, 47 rectal tumors with known apoptotic phenotype (24 low- and 23 high-apoptotic) were analyzed by oligonucleotide microarray technology. We identified several genes differentially expressed between low- and high-apoptotic tumors. Unsupervised clustering of the tumors based on expression levels of these genes separated the low-apoptotic from the high-apoptotic tumors, indicating a gene expression-dependent regulation. In addition, this clustering revealed two subgroups of high-apoptotic tumors. One high-apoptotic subgroup showed subtle differences in mRNA and protein expression of the known apoptotic regulators BAX, cIAP2 and ARC compared to the low-apoptotic tumors. The other subgroup of high-apoptotic tumors showed high expression of immune-related genes; predominantly HLA class II and chemokines, but also HLA class I and interferon-inducible genes were highly expressed. Immunohistochemistry revealed HLA-DR expression in epithelial tumor cells in 70% of these high-apoptotic tumors. The expression data suggest that high levels of apoptosis in rectal carcinoma patients can be the result of either slightly altered expression of known pro- and anti-apoptotic genes or high expression of immune-related genes.
KeywordsRectal cancer Apoptosis Gene expression profiling
Apoptosis is an important intrinsic characteristic of rectal tumors. High amounts of apoptotic tumor cells correlate with a reduced local recurrence risk in rectal cancer patients who were treated by surgery only [1, 2]. From the literature, it is known that the apoptotic process can be regulated by two main pathways: the death-receptor pathway and the mitochondrial pathway. The death-receptor pathway is induced via engagement of death receptors, such as CD95, by their ligands. Receptor polymerization leads to the recruitment of the death-inducing signaling complex, resulting in the activation of caspase-8. The mitochondrial pathway is activated during cellular stress, such as DNA damage or oxidative stress, via the release of cytochrome c from the mitochondrion resulting in the activation of caspase-9. This cytochrome c release is controlled by the pro- and anti-apoptotic members of the Bcl-2 family.
Deregulation of these apoptotic pathways can contribute to a number of human diseases, like neurodegenerative disorders and cancer. During progression from normal cell to tumor cell and consequent metastasis, the cells are exposed to a range of apoptotic stresses. Cells that acquire mutations that suppress apoptosis will have a selective growth advantage and will expand. Such anti-apoptotic mutations can therefore result in therapy-resistant tumors and are thought to contribute to treatment failure. For rectal cancer, several studies have evaluated the role of apoptosis for the sensitivity of tumors to anti-cancer treatment. Tumors with high levels of intrinsic apoptosis were indeed more likely to regress upon neo-adjuvant radiochemotherapy than tumors where apoptosis was low (reviewed by Smith et al. ), indicating that these intrinsically high-apoptotic tumors are more sensitive to apoptotic triggers. Since this sensitivity can be regulated by the Bcl-2 family of proteins, use of the pro-apoptotic Bax and the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins as predictive markers for response to neo-adjuvant therapy has been studied. Two recent publications indeed suggest a role for Bax in therapy response [4, 5], but most studies found no correlation between the expression of Bax or Bcl-2 and tumor downstaging or clinical outcome of the patients after radio- and/or chemotherapy .
Interestingly, rectal cancer patients treated only by surgery had a relatively low local recurrence rate when the tumor intrinsic level of apoptosis was high. Because this intrinsic apoptosis occurred in the absence of neo-adjuvant treatment, it is important to know which proteins are responsible for the low or high levels of intrinsic apoptosis in vivo. The objective of our study was therefore to identify genes involved in the induction and/or progression of intrinsic apoptosis in human tumors. Since the process of apoptosis can be regulated by multiple proteins (pro- and anti-apoptotic proteins) and at several levels in the pathways (up- and downstream of the mitochondria), identification of apoptosis regulators requires assessment of the expression of a large number of genes. Oligonucleotide microarray analysis allowed us to assess such large numbers of genes simultaneously. We used this technique to analyze rectal tumors with known apoptotic phenotype, available from a prospective multicenter trial with standardized surgery and pathologic examination , and compared the expression profiles of low- versus high-apoptotic tumors. The genome-wide information reported here contributes to our understanding of apoptosis in vivo.
Materials and methods
Patients and tumor samples
Tumor samples were obtained at time of surgery from rectal cancer patients participating in the Dutch TME trial . A total amount of 47 freshly frozen non-irradiated tumors were selected with a clear distinction in their apoptotic phenotype (lowest versus highest quartiles of apoptosis levels) as previously determined by immunohistochemical staining with the M30 antibody ; 24 tumors had low levels of apoptosis (< 5 M30-positive cells/mm2 tumor epithelium) and 23 tumors had high levels of apoptosis (> 25 M30-positive cells/mm2 tumor epithelium). There was no significant difference between these low- and high-apoptotic tumors with respect to clinicopathologic characteristics such as gender, age, TNM stage or tumor differentiation status.
RNA isolation and microarray procedure
RNA was extracted as described in detail elsewhere  from macrodissected samples containing at least 60% tumor epithelium, as determined by haematoxylin and eosin (HE)-stained frozen sections. Quality of total RNA was assessed with lab-on-a-chips on the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, California). All samples were shown to be free of DNA contamination and for each sample the ratio 28S/18S was > 1.5. Amplifications of mRNA and dye couplings were performed using Ambion’s Amino Allyl MessageAmpTM kit and protocol (Ambion Inc., Austin, TX). Per microarray experiment, 2.0-μg aliquots of RNA were amplified, and 5.0-μg aliquots of amino allyl-labeled aRNA was coupled to CyDye Post Labelling Reactive Dyes (Ambion Inc.): Cy5 for tumor samples, and Cy3 for reference sample, consisting of pooled RNAs isolated from five normal rectum samples and five colorectal cancer cell lines (HCT116, LS411N, SW480, HCT15 and Caco2).
About 2.0-μg aliquots of labeled sample RNA were mixed with equal amounts of labeled reference RNA and fragmented using RNA Fragmentation Reagents and protocol (Ambion Inc). About 20 μg yeast tRNA (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and 20 μg polyadenylic acid (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) were added and mixtures were heated at 100°C for 1 min, placed on ice for 2 min and at 42°C for 5 min. Preheated 2 × hybridization buffer (50% formamide, 10 × SSC, 0.01% SDS) was added just before hybridization at 42°C o/n onto the Human Genome Oligo Set Version 3.0 arrays, manufactured at the Central Microarray Facility (CMF) of the Netherlands Cancer Institute. Information about this oligo set (e.g. oligonucleotide sequence, gene symbol, protein description, EnsembleID and GO-term) is available at the website of Operon (http://www.omad.operon.com). Protocols, GeneID list and information about arrays are available at the website of the CMF (http://www.microarrays.nki.nl). Of each slide, two images were scanned using the Agilent G2565BA Microarray Scanner (Agilent Technologies), at 50 and 100% gain intensities. Spot intensities were extracted from the scanned images with Genepix 5.1 (Axon, Baden, Switzerland). Spots with aberrant shapes were flagged by the software and checked manually.
Computational and statistical analysis
Raw intensity data (.gpr files) were directly loaded into the R environment (http://www.r-project.org). For normalization of the arrays and identification of differentially expressed genes, the Limma (linear models for microarray data) package of Bioconductor (http://www.bioconductor.org) was applied. Control spots and spots with more than 10% saturation, a diameter smaller than 60 μm or signal intensity less than 150 above background were excluded from the analyses. Data were corrected for local background (method normexp) and normalized within arrays and between arrays (method quantile). The spots of the low and high intensity scans were normalized separately. Duplicate experiments were done for 10 different tumor samples, showing Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.86 to 0.92.
Statistically significant differences in the staining of the oligos were assessed using a moderate empirical Bayes test statistics  available through the Limma software package. The B-value is the log-odds that a gene is differently expressed. The obtained p-values were corrected for multiple testing using the False Discovery Rate method . Oligos with B-values ≥0.5 and corrected p-values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. These oligos were grouped into biological categories using the Gene Ontology (GO) terms provided by the manufacturer.
Unsupervised hierarchical clustering (with ‘unweighted average’ and ‘correlation’) was done with Spotfire Decisionsite™ (Somerville, MA, USA) using the normalized log2 Cy3/Cy5-data.
The Gene Ontology Tree Machine (GOTM; http://www.genereg.ornl.gov/gotm) tool was used to identify biological processes that were significantly over-represented among the oligos found to be differentially expressed when compared with the list of all oligos on the array . For these GOTM-analyses we used the EnsembleIDs corresponding to the oligonucleotide sequences on the array as gene identifiers.
Quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR)
For first strand cDNA synthesis, 1.5-μg aliquots of total RNA were reverse transcribed using oligo(dT)-primers and M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Promega Corporation, WI, USA), according to manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA was available from 35 tumor samples that were analyzed by microarray analysis.
The real-time PCR primer sets were designed by SuperArray (SuperArray Bioscience Corporation, MD, USA). Real-time amplifications were done according to manufacturer’s protocol using RT2 Real-TimeTM SYBR Green/Fluorescein PCR Master Mix (SuperArray Bioscience Corporation). Reactions were run on an iCycler iQ Real-time Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA, USA). A melt curve was generated at the end of each run in order to determine the specificity of the product. A calibration curve, consisting of several dilutions of cDNA of the reference used for the microarray procedure, was included for each gene to allow calculation of the relative starting quantities. These relative starting quantities were used in the normalization and statistical analyses.
Expression levels were normalized to three genes (CPSF6, GAPDH and HPRT1) to acquire a reliable normalization of the qPCR data. These genes showed the least variation between all samples as determined by the geNorm programme . This geNorm method provides a normalization factor per gene, representative of the amount of mRNA in each sample.
To compare the qPCR data with the microarray data, the qPCR data were log2 transformed and Pearson correlation coefficients were determined using SPSS statistical software (version 12.0 for Windows, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).
Stainings were performed on 4-μm sections using the following antibodies: anti-Bax (N-20) at 1:200 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), anti-cIAP2 (AF817) at 1:200 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), anti-ARC (CT) at 1:2,000 (ProSci Inc., Poway, CA), anti-HLA-A (HCA2) at 1:100 (kindly provided by Dr. J. Neefjes) and anti-HLA-DR (clone LN3; Signet Laboratories Inc., Dedham, MA). For Bax, cIAP2 and HLA-A the staining procedure was done as described previously [5, 11, 12]. For ARC and HLA-DR we used the following protocol: tissues had been deparaffinised and endogenous peroxidise activity had been blocked by 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 30 min. Antigen retrieval was performed by boiling for 10 min in 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH 6.0). Subsequently, sections were preincubated for 30 min with 20% normal goat serum in PBS/1% BSA. After overnight incubation with the primary antibody sections were incubated for 1 h with biotinylated goat-anti-mouse or goat-anti-rabbit (1:200, DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark) followed by incubation with streptavidin complexed with biotinylated peroxidase (DakoCytomation), and developed in 3,3-di-amino-benzidine (DakoCytomation). Finally, sections were counterstained with Mayer’s haematoxylin. As negative control, the primary antibody in PBS/1% BSA was replaced by PBS alone. The results presented for each antibody are based on the analysis of tissues from at least 4 individuals per group.
Genes differentially expressed in low- and high-apoptotic rectal tumors
The gene expression data therefore indicate that different sets of genes are involved in the regulation of apoptosis in clusters A and B.
High-apoptotic phenotype of Cluster A
Correlation between qPCR and microarray data
In our previous analyses comparing all high-apoptotic tumors with the low-apoptotic tumors, BAX and cIAP2 were on average expressed at similar levels (fold difference between the high- and low-apoptotic tumors was 0.9 for BAX and 1.1 for cIAP2, both not statistically significant). Interestingly, the high-apoptotic tumors can be divided into two separate clusters of which cluster A showed higher BAX and lower cIAP2 expression when compared with cluster B. In addition, we observed significant lower cIAP2 expression levels and a trend towards higher BAX expression in the high-apoptotic tumors of cluster A than in the low-apoptotic tumors. These data strengthen the significance of dividing the high-apoptotic tumors into two subgroups.
To further analyze the high-apoptotic phenotype of cluster A, the microarray data of these tumors were compared with the low-apoptotic tumors. Surprisingly, this analysis revealed only five oligos, indicating a low number of differentially expressed genes (Supplementary Table 3). Genetic differences between these two groups of tumors are thus very small. This might imply an apoptosis regulation independent of gene expression levels. Nonetheless, one of the identified oligos represented the anti-apoptotic protein ARC. This protein was reported to bind Bax, and to prevent the release of cytochrome c . The microarray data show that ARC was expressed at significantly lower levels in the high-apoptotic cluster A when compared to the low-apoptotic tumors. Validation of the microarray data by qPCR confirmed the lower ARC expression in the tumors of cluster A as compared to the low-apoptotic tumors (Fig. 4A).
The differential expression of BAX, cIAP2 and ARC between the tumor clusters was evaluated on protein level by immunohistochemistry. Differences in staining intensities confirmed the mRNA data; tumors belonging to cluster A stained Bax with higher and cIAP2 with lower intensities then cluster B and low-apoptotic tumors. ARC was also lower expression in the high-apoptotic cluster A and B when compared with the low-apoptotic tumors (Fig. 4B and Supplementary Fig. 1).
Overall, the high-apoptotic phenotype of the tumors belonging to cluster A might be explained by gene expression-independent regulation, or might be the result of lower expression of the anti-apoptotic ARC and cIAP2 in combination with a slightly higher expression of the pro-apoptotic BAX.
High-apoptotic phenotype of cluster B
The high-apoptotic tumors of cluster B formed a separate group in the unsupervised clustering analysis (Fig. 2A), suggesting a distinct gene expression profile. By comparing the gene expression profiles of these high-apoptotic tumors with the low-apoptotic tumors, we identified 322 oligos, representing 217 annotated genes differentially expressed (Supplementary Table 4). Interestingly, 37% of the oligos had a 2-fold change or more in expression, indicating a substantial difference in genetic background of these groups of tumors.
GOTM analysis with this set of 322 oligos revealed a significant enrichment of immune-related categories. These categories were previously identified when cluster B was compared with cluster A, suggesting that these categories are specific for the high-apoptotic tumors of cluster B.
In this study we describe the identification of genes which are differentially expressed in low- versus high-apoptotic rectal tumors. Since the rectal cancer patients were treated by surgery only, the identified genes are related to the tumor-intrinsic level of apoptosis in vivo, previously described to predict local recurrences [1, 2]. Importantly, unsupervised clustering analysis identified two clusters of high-apoptotic tumors, suggesting two distinct mechanisms regulating apoptosis in vivo. We therefore analyzed these two clusters of high-apoptotic tumors separately.
The differences in gene expression between one of the high-apoptotic clusters (cluster A) and the low-apoptotic tumors were subtle; these high-apoptotic tumors clustered close to the low-apoptotic tumors in the unsupervised clustering and a very low amount of genes were identified as differentially expressed at statistically significant levels. The high-apoptotic phenotype of these tumors might therefore, at least to some extent, be explained by gene-expression independent regulation, such as distinct localization of proteins (e.g. mitochondria versus cytosol), and inactivation or activation of proteins via phosphorylation (Bad) or cleavage (caspases). Another explanation for the low amount of differentially expressed genes can be the fact that we used strict cut-off values for significance for each single oligo in order to minimize the number of false-positive genes. After correcting for multiple hypotheses testing, hardly any individual gene meets the threshold for statistical significance when the genetic differences are modest relative to the background noise. In that case, differences in expression of individual genes might not reach significant levels, but a combination of small differences in expression of genes belonging to the same pathway can have profound biological consequences .
More in-depth analyses on the known apoptotic regulators BAX, ARC and cIAP2 revealed small differences in mRNA expression among the three tumor groups, which were confirmed on protein level. The pro-apoptotic protein Bax plays an important role in the permeabilization of the mitochondrial membrane, leading to release of cytochrome c into the cytosol. Cytosolic cytochrome c, together with APAF-1, activates caspase-9 and subsequently caspase-3. The highest Bax expression was observed in cluster A of the intrinsically high-apoptotic tumors. In accordance with our results, recent clinical studies have shown that high Bax protein expression (in pretreatment biopsies) was associated with improved local control for rectal cancer patients [4, 5], or improved survival for colorectal carcinoma patients treated by surgery only . Furthermore, in vitro experiments have shown a role for Bax in the apoptotic response of colorectal cancer cells to multiple death stimuli [21, 22]. Tumors with high Bax expression in vivo might therefore be more susceptible to apoptotic triggers. In addition, the high-apoptotic tumors of cluster A demonstrated a relatively low expression of the anti-apoptotic ARC and cIAP2. ARC exerts its anti-apoptotic function by interfering with Bax. In doing so, it prevents mitochondrial permeabilization and the release of cytochrome c . The anti-apoptotic cIAP2 belongs to the family of Inhibitor of apoptotis proteins (IAPs) that is suggested to prevent apoptosis (at least partially) due to binding to caspases, thereby inhibiting the caspase activity [23, 24]. The cumulative effects of a slight higher expression of Bax and lower expression of ARC and cIAP2 might thus be responsible for the high-apoptotic phenotype of the tumors belonging to cluster A.
Intriguingly, the high-apoptotic tumors belonging to cluster B expressed high levels of genes that code for proteins involved in the immune response. Several publications showed that important signaling events occur between tumor cells and the surrounding stromal and infiltrating cells [25, 26, 27]. Microdissection of only tumor epithelial cells could thus lead to substantial loss of information regarding these mechanisms. We recently published that macrodissection provides more reliable data for the expression of tumor epithelial genes than laser microdissection . For those reasons, we used macrodissected samples, containing stromal components. This approach resulted in the identification of a high expression of immune-related genes in the tumors of cluster B. This high expression in cluster B is probably not an effect of more stroma. We previously published that the contribution of stromal mRNA to the total amount of mRNA isolated from macrodissected tumors is minor , and we did not observe large differences in the amount of stroma between the tumors. In agreement, immunohistochemistry using HLA-DR, Bax and cIAP2 confirms that the differential expression results from epithelial tumor cells. Although the amounts of stroma were equally distributed, the composition of the stromal compartment can vary between the clusters. In mouse models, induced expression of HLA-DR in epithelial tumor cells enhances the infiltration of dendritic cells and anti-tumor T-cell responses [29, 30]. The high expression of chemokines in cluster B tumors might thus result from tumor infiltrating immune cells, pointing to a phenotypic difference between the clusters. The observation that multiple interferon-gamma-induced genes were higher expressed in these high-apoptotic tumors (e.g. TRIM22, IFI30, STAT1, IRF1, INDO) suggest that these tumors indeed mount an immune response, leading to interferon secretion and induction of interferon-responsive genes. Interferon-gamma can induce apoptosis in tumor cells directly, and also via enhancement of the immune response . Our data therefore strongly suggest that these patients with intrinsically high-apoptotic tumors mount an immune response towards the tumor cells, thereby controlling tumor recurrences. Pages and coworkers recently published a role for the adaptive immune response in preventing recurrences in colorectal cancer patients [32, 33]. Moreover, we previously published that the amount of intratumoral macrophages, NK- and T-cells correlated with a reduced local recurrence rates in rectal cancer patients , again indicating an immune-mediated control of rectal cancer.
Microarray analysis on intrinsically low- and high-apoptotic tumors identified two separate groups of high-apoptotic rectal tumors. One group demonstrated subtle differences in expression of known pro- and anti-apoptotic proteins involved in the mitochondrial pathway. Because the expression differences are small, gene independent regulation of apoptosis might play a role as well. The other group of high-apoptotic tumors showed high expression of immune-related genes, suggesting a host’s immune response towards the tumor cells. Since rectal cancer patients with intrinsically high-apoptotic tumors have a better prognosis, this information may provide insight in the development of novel therapeutic regimens.
This study was financially supported by the Dutch Cancer Society: RUL 2002-2733. We thank J. Oosting (Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center) for providing the R-script for limma analyses, and P. Eilers (Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center) for advice regarding the clustering analyses. We are indebted to T. van Wezel (Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center) for advice regarding the qPCR experiments and to H. Morreau (Department of Pathology) for pathological evaluation of the macrodissection procedure. We are grateful to J. Neefjes (Department of Tumor Biology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam) for kindly providing the monoclonal HCA2 antibody.