Reynolds Number Dependence of Higher Order Statistics for Round Turbulent Jets Using Large Eddy Simulations

  • Sasan Salkhordeh
  • Sagnik Mazumdar
  • Anirban Jana
  • Mark L. KimberEmail author


Despite the large repository of experimental and computational studies on the topic of turbulent jets, inconclusive and conflicting estimates prevail in regard to certain terms in the turbulence energy budget and the dependence (or lack of dependence) of these and other flow physics on the jet Reynolds number. No comprehensive study exists which adequately addresses these inconsistencies. The purpose of this study is to resolve these contradictions and ascertain the true dependence of the flow statistics on the jet Reynolds number. This is accomplished through high fidelity Large Eddy Simulations (LES), which are performed for a single isothermal round jet at three different Reynolds numbers, encompassing nearly two orders of magnitude. In each case, results are compared to well-accepted experimental and computational studies, and excellent agreement is found with experimental quantities either directly acquired or computed directly from raw data. A separate discrete eddy simulation of the flow in the nozzle upstream of the jet inlet is performed and is found to be crucial in quantifying the flow physics in the near field (e.g., virtual origin). Results show a definite Reynolds number dependence for nearly all third order terms and this is non-negligible especially for the mean convection and production terms in the turbulent kinetic energy budget.


LES Turbulent jet Higher order moments 



This research was performed using funding received from the United States Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy’s Nuclear Energy University Programs. The authors are also grateful for the National Science Foundation’s eXtreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE) supercomputing resources used for most of the computational work required for this study. Additional resources available through the Institute for Scientific Computation at Texas A&M University also made this work possible.


This research was performed using funding received from the United States Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy’s Nuclear Energy University Programs.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Corrsin, S.: Investigation of flow in an axially symmetrical heated jet of air. NACA-WR-W-9 (1943)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Corrsin, S., Kistler, A.L.: Free-stream boundaries of turbulent flows. NACA, Washington, DC (1955)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Corrsin, S.: On the spectrum of isotropic temperature fluctuations in an isotropic turbulence. J. Appl. Phys. 22, 469–473 (1951)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wygnanski, I., Fiedler, H.: Some measurements in the self-preserving jet. J. Fluid Mech. 38, 577–612 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Panchapakesan, N., Lumley, J.: Turbulence measurements in axisymmetric jets of air and helium. Part 1. Air jet. J. Fluid Mech. 246, 197–223 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hussein, H.J., Capp, S.P., George, W.K.: Velocity measurements in a high-Reynolds-number, momentum-conserving, axisymmetric, turbulent jet. J. Fluid Mech. 258, 31–75 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wray, A.: A selection of test cases for the validation of large-eddy simulations of turbulent flows. AGARD Advisory Report. 345 (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, Z., He, P., Lv, Y., Zhou, J., Fan, J., Cen, K.: Direct numerical simulation of subsonic round turbulent jet. Flow Turbul. Combust. 84, 669–686 (2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Taub, G., Lee, H., Balachandar, S., Sherif, S.: A direct numerical simulation study of higher order statistics in a turbulent round jet. Phys. Fluids (1994-present) 25, 115102 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zuckerman, N., Lior, N.: Jet impingement heat transfer: physics, correlations, and numerical modeling. Adv. Heat Transf. 39, 565–631 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garimella, S.V., Rice, R.: Confined and submerged liquid jet impingement heat transfer. J. Heat Transf. 117, 871–877 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang, M., Freund, J.B., Lele, S.K.: Computational prediction of flow-generated sound. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 38, 483–512 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilcox, D.C.: Turbulence modeling for CFD. DCW Industries, La Canada (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Launder, B.E., Sandham, N.D.: Closure Strategies for Turbulent and Transitional Flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pope, S.B.: Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sagaut, P.: Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows. Springer, Berlin (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dejoan, A., Leschziner, M.A.: Large eddy simulation of a plane turbulent wall jet. Phys. Fluids 17, 025102 (2005)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bogey, C., Bailly, C.: Turbulence and energy budget in a self-preserving round jet: direct evaluation using large eddy simulation. J. Fluid Mech. 627, 129 (2009)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bogey, C., Bailly, C.: A study of the influence of the reynolds number on jet self-similarity using Large-Eddy Simulation. In: Direct and Large-Eddy Simulation VII, pp 11–16 (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gohil, T.B., Saha, A.K., Muralidhar, K.: Large eddy simulation of a free circular jet. J. Fluids Eng. 136, 051205 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lipari, G., Stansby, P.K.: Review of experimental data on incompressible turbulent round jets. Flow Turbul. Combust. 87, 79–114 (2011)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brown, C., Bridges, J.: Small hot jet acoustic rig validation. NASA/TM-2006-214234 (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mazumdar, S., Landfried, D.T., Jana, A., Kimber, M.: Computational study of confined isothermal turbulent round jets. In: 15th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal hydraulics, Pisa (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kim, J., Choi, H.: Large eddy simulation of a circular jet: effect of inflow conditions on the near field. J. Fluid Mech. 620, 383 (2009)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Clément, A.: Coupling of two absorbing boundary conditions for 2D time-domain simulations of free surface gravity waves. J. Comput. Phys. 126, 139–151 (1996)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lysenko, D.A., Ertesvåg, I.S., Rian, K.E.: Large-eddy simulation of the flow over a circular cylinder at Reynolds number 3900 using the OpenFOAM toolbox. Flow Turbul. Combust. 89, 491–518 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lysenko, D.A., Ertesvåg, I.S., Rian, K.E.: Large-eddy simulation of the flow over a circular cylinder at Reynolds number 2 × 104. Flow Turbul. Combust. 92, 673–698 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Salkhordeh, S.: Large eddy simulations of isothermal and non-isothermal turbulent flows for high temperature gas cooled reactors. University of Pittsburgh (2016)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Salkhordeh, S., Mazumdar, S., Landfried, D.T., Jana, A., Kimber, M.L.: LES of an isothermal high reynolds number turbulent round jet. In: 2014 22nd International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, pp. V004T10A48–VT10A48. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2014)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vuorinen, V., Keskinen, J.-P., Duwig, C., Boersma, B.: On the implementation of low-dissipative Runge–Kutta projection methods for time dependent flows using OpenFOAM®;. Comput. Fluids 93, 153–163 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Issa, R.I., Gosman, A., Watkins, A.: The computation of compressible and incompressible recirculating flows by a non-iterative implicit scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 62, 66–82 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Geurts, B.: Elements of Direct and Large-Eddy Simulation. RT Edwards, Philadelphia (2004)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lysenko, D.A., Ertesvåg, I.S., Rian, K.E.: Modeling of turbulent separated flows using OpenFOAM. Comput. Fluids 80, 408–422 (2013)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Salkhordeh, S., Clifford, C., Jana, A., Kimber, M.L.: Large Eddy simulations of scaled HTGR lower plenum for assessment of turbulent mixing. Nucl. Eng. Des. 334, 24–41 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Smagorinsky, J.: General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. I. The basic experiment*. Mon. Weather Rev. 91, 99–164 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bogey, C., Bailly, C.: Large eddy simulations of round free jets using explicit filtering with/without dynamic Smagorinsky model. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 27, 603–610 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Le Ribault, C., Sarkar, S., Stanley, S.A.: Large eddy simulation of a plane jet. Phys. Fluids 11, 3069 (1999)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fureby, C., Tabor, G., Weller, H., Gosman, A.: A comparative study of subgrid scale models in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids (1994-present) 9, 1416–1429 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lilly, D.: A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid-scale closure method. Phys. Fluids A: Fluid Dyn. (1989–1993) 4, 633–635 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bogey, C., Marsden, O.: Numerical modelling of jets exiting from the ASME and conical nozzles. In: 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, p. 0510 (2015)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    George, W.K.: The self-preservation of turbulent flows and its relation to initial conditions and coherent structures. In: Advances in Turbulence, pp. 39–73 (1989)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    George, W.K.: Asymptotic effect of initial and upstream conditions on turbulence. J. Fluids Eng. 134, 061203 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mi, J., Nobes, D.S., Nathan, G.: Influence of jet exit conditions on the passive scalar field of an axisymmetric free jet. J. Fluid Mech. 432, 91–125 (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Xu, G., Antonia, R.: Effect of different initial conditions on a turbulent round free jet. Exp. Fluids 33, 677–683 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ricou, F.P., Spalding, D.: Measurements of entrainment by axisymmetrical turbulent jets. J. Fluid Mech. 11, 21–32 (1961)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Boersma, B.J., Brethouwer, G., Nieuwstadt, F.T.M.: A numerical investigation on the effect of the inflow conditions on the self-similar region of a round jet. Phys. Fluids 10, 899 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Dahm, W.J., Dimotakis, P.E.: Mixing at large Schmidt number in the self-similar far field of turbulent jets. J. Fluid Mech. 217, 299–330 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kwon, S.J., Seo, I.W.: Reynolds number effects on the behavior of a non-buoyant round jet. Exp. Fluids 38, 801–812 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bogey, C., Bailly, C.: Large eddy simulations of transitional round jets: influence of the Reynolds number on flow development and energy dissipation. Phys. Fluids 18, 065101 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Fellouah, H., Ball, C.G., Pollard, A.: Reynolds number effects within the development region of a turbulent round free jet. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 52, 3943–3954 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mi, J., Xu, M., Zhou, T.: Reynolds number influence on statistical behaviors of turbulence in a circular free jet. Phys. Fluids (1994-present) 25, 075101 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Salkhordeh, S., Kimber, M.: Effect of inflow condition on near-field prediction of Large Eddy Simulations of isothermal and non-isothermal turbulent jets. APS Meeting Abstracts, 2017APS..DFDL31012S (2017)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Han, Y.O., George, W.K., Hjarne, J.: Effect of a contraction on turbulence. Part 1. Experiment. Spectrum 1, 11 (2005)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Spalart, P.R.: Detached-eddy simulation. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 41, 181–202 (2009)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Geurts, B.J, Fröhlich, J.: A framework for predicting accuracy limitations in large-eddy simulation. Phys. Fluids (1994-present) 14, L41–L44 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Shiri, A., George, W.K., Naughton, J.W.: Experimental study of the far field of incompressible swirling jets. AIAA J. 46, 2002–2009 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sasan Salkhordeh
    • 1
  • Sagnik Mazumdar
    • 2
  • Anirban Jana
    • 3
  • Mark L. Kimber
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Scientific Computing, Texas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA
  3. 3.Pittsburgh Supercomputing CenterCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA
  4. 4.Department of Nuclear Engineering, Department of Mechanical EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations