Flow, Turbulence and Combustion

, Volume 102, Issue 2, pp 355–372 | Cite as

Mixing Characteristics of Non-Newtonian Impinging Jets at Elevated Pressures

  • Vincent Notaro
  • Prashant KhareEmail author
  • Jong Guen Lee


The effect of chamber pressure on the mixing characteristics of like-doublet impinging liquid jets is experimentally and numerically investigated for non-gelled and gelled hypergolic propellant simulants. The experiment uses planar laser induced fluorescence technique to investigate the mixing efficiencies of impinging liquid streams. It is found that mixing is enhanced for both gelled and non-gelled fluids as the pressure increases. However, gelled simulants generally result in poorer mixing as compared to their non-gelled counterparts, suggesting that pre-impingement conditions are important factors that determine mixing efficiency. To verify this hypothesis, high-fidelity direct numerical simulations, based on a state-of-the-art volume-of-fluid (VOF) method are conducted at elevated pressures for the gelled simulant, treated as a Herschel-Bulkley non-Newtonian fluid. It is found that the Sauter mean diameter (SMD) changes significantly, and approaches the SMD of non-gelled impinging jets if the incoming jets are either perturbed by a sinusoidal disturbance or a fully developed turbulent flow profile is introduced, explaining the experimental observations and confirming the hypothesis.


Non-Newtonian fluids Impinging jets Mixing efficiency Volume of fluid 



The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge Dr. Ralph Anthenien, the contract monitor for supporting this research effort. The authors are also grateful to Dr. Stéphane Popinet for allowing them to use his VOF and AMR algorithms.

Funding Information

This work was supported by the United States Army Research Office under the Multi-University Research Initiative (MURI), contract number W911NF-08-1-0124.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Anderson, W.E., Ryan, H.M., Santoro, R.J.: Fundamental mechanisms of combustion instabilities: impinging jet injector atomization. In: Yang, V., Anderson, W.E. (eds.) Instability, Liquid Rocket Engine Combustion, pp. 215–246, AIAA Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics (1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    von Kampen, J., Alberio, F., Ciezki, H.K.: Spray and combustion characteristics of aluminized gelled fuels with an impinging jet injector. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 11, 77–83 (2007). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Negri, M., Ciezki, H.: Atomization of Non-Newtonian fluids with an impinging jet injector: influence of viscoelasticity on hindering droplets formation. In: 46th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ciezki, H., Robers, A., Schneider, G.: Investigation of the spray behavior of gelled jet-A1 fuels using an air blast and an impinging jet atomizer. In: 38th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Madlener, K., Ciezki, H., von Kampen, J., Heislbetz, B., Feinauer, A.: Characterization of various properties of gel fuels with regard to propulsion application. In: 44th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heislbetz, B., Madlener, K., Ciezki, H.: Breakup characteristics of a newtonian liquid sheet formed by a doublet impinging jet injector. In: 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang, L., Fu, Q., Zhang, W., Du, M., Tong, M.: Spray characteristics of gelled propellants in novel impinging jet injector. J. Propuls. Power 29, 104–113 (2012). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rupe, J.: The liquid-phase mixing of a pair of impinging streams. Progress Report 20-195 (1953)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rupe, J.: A correlation between the dynamic properties of a pair of impinging streams and the uniformity of the mixture-ratio distribution in the resulting spray. Progress Report 20-209 (1956)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ashgriz, N., Brocklehurst, W., Talley, D.: Mixing mechanisms in a pair of impinging jets. J. Propuls. Power 17, 736–749 (2001). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Riebling, R.W.: Effect of orifice length-to-diameter ratio on mixing in the spray from a pair of unlike impinging jets. J. Spacecr. Rockets 7, 894–896 (1970). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jung, K., Koh, H., Yoon, Y.: Assessment of planar liquid-laser-induced fluorescence measurements for spray mass distributions of like-doublet injectors. Meas. Sci. Technol. 14, 1387 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yuan, T., Huang, B.: Effects of momentum rate on the mixing of the spray of doublet impinging jets. In: ILASS Americas, 23nd Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems. Ventura (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yuan, T., Chen, C., Chen, Y.-D., Huang, B.: The observation of the atomization and mixing of doublet-jets impinging sprays at elevated ambient pressures. In: ICLASS 2012, 12th Triennial International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems. Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fakhri, S., Lee, J.G., Yetter, R.A.: Effect of nozzle geometry on the atomization and spray characteristics of gelled-propellant simulants formed by two impinging jets. At. Sprays 20, 1033–1046 (2010). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ramasubramanian, C., Notaro, V., Lee, J.G.: Characterization of near-field spray of nongelled- and gelled-impinging doublets at high pressure. J. Propuls. Power 31, 1642–1652 (2015). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Burger, W., Burge, M.J.: Digital Image Processing an Algorithmic Introduction Using Java. Springer, Berlin (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jung, K., Yoon, Y., Hwang, S.-S.: Spray characteristics of impinging jet injectors using imaging techniques. In: 36th AIAA/ASME Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pópinet, S.: An accurate adaptive solver for surface-tension-driven interfacial flows. J. Comput. Phys. 228, 5838–5866 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Khare, P.: Breakup of Liquid Droplets (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ma, D., Chen, X., Khare, P., Yang, V.: Atomization and breakup characteristics of liquid sheets formed by two impinging jets (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen, X., Khare, P., Ma, D., Yang, V.: Impinging jets and droplet dynamics. arXiv:1110.3356 (2011)
  23. 23.
    Chen, X., Ma, D., Yang, V., Popinet, S.: High-fidelity simulations of impinging jet atomization. At. Sprays 23, 1079–1101 (2013). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tomar, G., Fuster, D., Zaleski, S., Popinet, S.: Multiscale simulations of primary atomization using Gerris. Comput. Fluids 39, 1864–1874 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khare, P., Yang, V.: A study on the breakup of water droplets. Submitt. to Physics of Fluids (2018)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Khare, P., Yang, V.: Breakup of non-Newtonian liquid droplets. In: 44th AIAA Fluid Dynamic Conference (2014).
  27. 27.
    Lee, J.G., Ramasubramanian, C., Notaro, V.: Mixing analysis of like doublet injectors in high pressure environments for gelled propellant simulants. In: 50th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference. (2014)
  28. 28.
    Yasuda, N., Yamamura, K., Mori, Y.H.: Impingement of liquid jets at atmospheric and elevated pressures: an observational study using paired water jets or water and methylcyclohexane jets. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 466, 3501–3526 (2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Khare, P., Yang, V.: Newtonian and non-Newtonian liquid droplet breakup: child droplet statistics. In: Proceedings of the ICLASS 2015, 13th Triennial International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering MechanicsUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations