Advertisement

Large Eddy Simulation Requirements for the Flow over Periodic Hills

  • Xavier GloerfeltEmail author
  • Paola Cinnella
Article
  • 79 Downloads

Abstract

Large eddy simulations are carried out for flows in a channel with streamwise-periodic constrictions, a well-documented benchmark case to study turbulent flow separation from a curved surface. Resolution criteria such as wall units are restricted to attached flows and enhanced criteria, such as energy spectra or two-point correlations, are used to evaluate the effective scale separation in the present large eddy simulations. A detailed analysis of the separation above the hill crest and of the early shear layer development shows that the delicate flow details in this region may be hardly resolved on coarse grids already at Re = 10595, possibly leading to a non monotonic convergence with mesh refinement. The intricate coupling between numerical and modeling errors is studied by means of various discretization schemes and subgrid models. It is shown that numerical schemes maximizing the resolution capabilities are a key ingredient for obtaining high-quality solutions while using a reduced number of grid points. On this respect, the introduction of a sharp enough filter is an essential condition for separating accurately the resolved scales from the subfilter scales and for removing ill-resolved structures. The high-resolution approach is seen to provide solutions in very good overall agreement with the available experimental data for a range of Reynolds numbers (up to 37000) without need for significant grid refinement.

Keywords

Large eddy simulation High-accuracy method Periodic hill flow 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was granted access to the HPC resources of IDRIS and CCRT under the allocation 1736 made by GENCI (Grand Equipement National de Calcul Intensif).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Ghosal, S.: An analysis of numerical errors in large-Eddy Simulations of turbulence. J. Comput. Phys. 125, 187–206 (1996)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vreman, B., Geurts, B., Kuerten, H.: Comparison of numerical schemes in large-eddy simulation of the temporal mixing layer. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 22, 297–311 (1996)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kravchenko, A., Moin, P.: On the effect of numerical errors in large eddy simulations of turbulent flows. J. Comput. Phys. 131, 310–322 (1997)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Meyers, J., Sagaut, P., Geurts, B.: Optimal model parameters for multi-objective large-eddy simulations. Phys. Fluids 18(095), 103 (2006)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Meyers, J., Geurts, B., Sagaut, P.: A computational error-assessment of central finite-volume discretizations in large-eddy simulation using a Smagorinsky model. J. Comput. Phys. 227, 156–173 (2007)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davidson, L.: Large eddy simulations: how to evaluate resolution. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow 30, 1016–1025 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davidson, L.: How to estimate resolution of an LES of recirculating flow. In: Salvetti, M.E.A. (ed.) Quality and Reliability of Large-Eddy Simulations II (2010), pp 269–286 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rapp, C., Breuer, M., Manhart, M., Peller, N.: 2d periodic hill flow. ERCOFTAC QNET-CFD. http://qnet-ercoftac.cfms.org.uk/w/index.php/UFR_3-30
  9. 9.
    Balakumar, P., Rubinstein, R., Rumsey, C.: DNS, enstrophy balance, and the dissipation equation in a separated turbulent channel flow. 43rd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, 24-27 June, San Diego, California. AIAA Paper 2013–2723 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Breuer, M., Peller, N., Rapp, C., Manhart, M.: Flow over periodic hills - numerical and experimental study in a wide range of Reynolds numbers. Comput. Fluids 38, 433–457 (2009)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davidson, L., Peng, S.: Hybrid LES-RANS modelling: a one-equation SGS model combined with a k-ω model for predicting recirculating flows. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 43, 1003–1018 (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Duprat, C., Balarac, G., Métais, O., Congedo, P., Brugière, O.: A wall-layer model for large-eddy simulations of turbulent flows with/out pressure gradient. Phys. Fluids 23(015), 101 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fröhlich, J., Mellen, C., Rodi, W., Temmerman, L., Leschziner, M.: Highly resolved large-eddy simulation of separated flow in a channel with streamwise periodic constrictions. J. Fluid Mech. 526, 19–66 (2005)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fröhlich, J., von Terzi, D.: Hybrid LES-RANS methods for the simulation of turbulent flows. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 44, 349–377 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Temmerman, L., Hadziabdić, M., Leschziner, M., Hanjalic, K.: A hybrid two-layer URANS-LES approach for large eddy simulation at high Reynolds numbers. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow 26, 173–190 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Temmerman, L., Leschziner, M., Mellen, C., Fröhlich, J.: Investigation of wall-function approximations and subgrid-scale models in large-eddy simulation of separated flow in a channel with streamwise periodic constrictions. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow 24, 157–180 (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tessicini, F., Temmerman, L., Leschziner, M.: Approximate near-wall treatments based on zonal and hybrid RANS-LES methods for LES at high Reynolds numbers. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow 27, 789–799 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xia, Z., Shi, Y., Hong, R., Xiao, Z., Chen, S.: Constrained large-eddy simulation of separated flow in a channel with streamwise-periodic constrictions. J. Turbulence 14(1), 1–21 (2013)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ziefle, J., Stolz, S., Kleiser, L.: Large-eddy simulation of separated flow in a channel with streamwise-periodic constrictions. AIAA J. 46, 1705–1718 (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aubard, G., Stefanin Volpiani, P., Gloerfelt, X., Robinet, J.C.: Comparison of subgrid-scale viscosity models and selective filtering strategy for large-eddy simulations. Flow Turbul. Combust. 91(3), 497–518 (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chicheportiche, J., Gloerfelt, X.: Study of interpolation methods for high-accuracy computations on overlapping grids. Comput. Fluids 68, 112–133 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Le Garrec, T., Gloerfelt, X., Corre, C.: Multi-size-mesh multi-time-step algorithm for noise computation on curvilinear meshes. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 74 (1), 1–33 (2014)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kähler, C., Scharnowski, S., Cierpka, C.: Highly resolved experimental results of the separated flow in a channel with streamwise periodic constrictions. J. Fluid Mech. 796, 257–284 (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rapp, C., Manhart, M.: Flow over periodic hills: an experimental study. Exp. Fluids 51, 247–269 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Haase, W., Braza, M., Revell, A.: (Eds.): DESider - A European Effort on Hybrid RANS-LES Modelling; Results of the european-Union Funded Project, 2004-2007, Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary design, vol. 103 Springer (2009)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schwamborn, D.: Results and lessons learned from the eu-project Ataac. In: Braza, M., Bottaro, A., Thompson, M. (eds.) Advances in Fluid-Structure Interaction: Updated contributions reflecting new findings presented at the ERCOFTAC Symposium on Unsteady Separation in Fluid-Structure Interaction, 17-21 June 2013, St John Resort, Mykonos, Greece, pp. 221–233. Springer (2016)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kroll, N., Hirsch, C., Bassi, F., Johnston, C., Hillewaert, K.: IDIHOM: Industrialization of High-Order Methods - A Top-Down Approach; Results of a Collaborative Research Project Funded by the European Union, 2010-2014, Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, vol. 128 Springer (2015)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    1st International Workshop on High-Order CFD Methods, sponsored by Fluid Dynamics TC, AFOSR and DLR, January 7-8 2012 at the 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Nashville, Tennessee. http://dept.ku.edu/cfdku/hiocfd.html
  29. 29.
    2nd International Workshop on High-Order CFD Methods, sponsored by DLR, AIAA and AFOSR, May 27-28 2013 at NH Hotel Köln City, Germany. http://www.dlr.de/as/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-8170/13999_read-35550
  30. 30.
    3rd International Workshop on High-Order CFD Methods, sponsored by NASA, AIAA, DLR and Army Research Office (ARO), January 3-4 2015 at the 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, Florida. https://www.grc.nasa.gov/hiocfd
  31. 31.
    Mellen, C., Fröhlich, J., Rodi, W.: Large eddy simulation of the flow over periodic hills. In: M.D..R., Owens (ed.) Proc. IMACS World Congress. Lausanne (2000)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Benocci, C., Pinelli, A.: The role of the forcing-term in large-eddy simulation of equilibrium channel flow. In: Ganíc, W.R.E. (ed.) Engineering Turbulence Modeling and Experiments, pp 287–296 (1990)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lenormand, E., Sagaut, P., Ta Phuoc, L.: Large eddy simulation of subsonic and supersonic channel flow at moderate Reynolds number. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 32, 369–406 (2000)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bogey, C., Bailly, C.: A family of low dispersive and low dissipative explicit schemes for noise computation. J. Comput. Phys. 194, 194–214 (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Berland, J., Bogey, C., Bailly, C.: A study of differentiation errors in large-eddy simulations based on the EDQNM theory. J. Comput. Phys. 227(18), 8314–8340 (2008)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gloerfelt, X., Cinnella, P.: Investigation of high-order methods in large-eddy simulation of separated flow in a channel with periodic constrictions. In: Grigoriadis, D., Geurts, B., Kuerten, H., Fröhlich, J., Armenio, V. (eds.) Direct and Large-Eddy Simulation X, ERCOFTAC Series, pp 441–447. Springer, Switzerland (2018)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Berland, J., Bogey, C., Marsden, O., Bailly, C.: High-order, low dispersive and low dissipative explicit schemes for multiple-scale and boundary problems. J. Comput. Phys. 224(2), 637–662 (2007)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yoshizawa, A.: Statistical theory for compressible turbulent shear flows, with the application to subgrid modeling. Phys. Fluids 29, 2152–2164 (1986)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Erlebacher, G., Hussaini, M., Speziale, C., Zang, T.: Toward the large-eddy simulation of compressible turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 238, 155–185 (1992)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Moin, P., Kim, J.: Numerical investigation of turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 118, 341–377 (1982)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Piomelli, U., Moin, P., Ferziger, J.: Model consistency in large eddy simulation of turbulent channel flows. Phys. Fluids 31(7), 1884–1891 (1988)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P., Cabot, W.: A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys. Fluids A 3(7), 1760–1765 (1991)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lilly, D.K.: A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid-scale closure method. Phys. Fluids 4, 633–635 (1992)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hughes, T., Mazzei, L., Oberai, A.: The multiscale formulation of large eddy simulation : decay of homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 13(2), 505–512 (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Borue, V., Orszag, S.: Self-similar decay of three-dimensional homogeneous turbulence with hyperviscosity. Phys. Rev. E 51(2), R856–R859 (1995)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cook, A., Cabot, W.: A high-wavenumber viscosity for high-resolution numerical methods. J. Comput. Phys. 195(2), 594–601 (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Karamanos, G.S., Karniadakis, G.: A spectral-vanishing viscosity method for large-eddy simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 163, 22–50 (2000)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Boris, J., Grinstein, F., Oran, E., Kolbe, R.: New insights into large eddy simulation. Fluid Dyn. Res. 10, 199–228 (1992)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Fureby, C., Grinstein, F.: Large eddy simulation of high-Reynolds number free and wall-bounded flows. J. Comput. Phys. 181, 68–97 (2002)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Stolz, S., Adams, N.: Large-eddy simulation of high-Reynolds-number supersonic boundary layers using the approximate deconvolution model and rescaling and recycling technique. Phys. Fluids 15(8), 2398–2412 (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Rizzetta, D., Visbal, M., Blaisdell, G.: A time-implicit high-order compact differencing and filtering scheme for large-eddy simulation. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 42, 665–693 (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Bogey, C., Bailly, C.: Large eddy simulations of round jets using explicit filtering with/without dynamic Smagorinsky model. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow 27, 603–610 (2006)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Mathew, J., Lechner, R., Foysi, H., Sesterhenn, J., Friedrich, R.: An explicit filtering method for large eddy simulation of compressible flows. Phys. Fluids 15(8), 2279–2289 (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Piomelli, U., Chasnov, J.: Large-eddy simulations: theory and applications. In: Hallbäck, M., Henningson, D., Johansson, A., Alfredsson, P. (eds.) Turbulence and Transition Modelling, Lecture Notes from the ERCOFTAC/IUTAM Summerschool Held in Stockholm, 12-20 June, 1995, ERCOFTAC Series, vol. 2, pp 269–336. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1996)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Krank, B., Kronbichler, M., Wall, W.: Direct numerical simulation of flow over periodic hills up to ReH = 10595. Flow Turbul. Combust. 1–31  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-018-9941-3 (2018)
  56. 56.
    Carati, D., Winckelmans, G., Jeanmart, H.: On the modelling of the subgrid-scale and filtered-scale stress tensors in large-eddy simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 441, 119–138 (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Domaradzki, J., Saiki, E.: A subgrid-scale model based on the estimation of unresolved scales of turbulence. Phys. Fluids 9(7), 2148–2164 (1997)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Gullbrand, J., Chow, F.: The effect of numerical errors and turbulence models in large-eddy simulations of channel flow, with and without explicit filtering. J. Fluid Mech. 495, 323–341 (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lund, T., Kaltenbach, H.J.: Experiments with explicit filtering for LES using a finite-difference method. In: Annual Research Briefs, pp 91–105. Center for Turbulence Research, NASA Ames/Stanford Univ., CA (1995)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Mokhtarpoor, R., Heinz, S., Stoellinger, M.: Dynamic unified RANS-LES simulations of high Reynolds number separated flows. Phys. Fluids 28, 0951,101–1–0951, 101–36 (2016)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Diosady, L., Murman, S.: DNS Of flows over periodic hills using a discontinuous-Galerkin spectral-element method. 44th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, 16-20 June, Atlanta, GA AIAA Paper 2014–2784 (2014)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Howarth, L.: Concerning the effect of compressibility on laminar boundary layers and their separation. Proc. of the Royal Society of London A 194(1036), 16–42 (1948)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ho, C.M., Huang, L.S.: Subharmonics and vortex merging in mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 119, 443–473 (1982)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Ho, C.M., Nosseir, N.: Dynamics of an impinging jet. Part 1. The feedback phenomenon. J. Fluid Mech. 105, 119–142 (1981)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Gloerfelt, X.: Large eddy simulations of high Reynolds number cavity flows. Workshop direct and large-eddy simulation 8 July, vol. 7-9. Eindhoven, The Netherlands (2010)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Oster, D., Wygnanski, I.: The forced mixing layer between parallel streams. J. Fluid Mech. 123, 91–130 (1982)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Gloerfelt, X., Bogey, C., Bailly, C.: Numerical evidence of mode switching in the flow-induced oscillations by a cavity. Int. J. of Aeroacoustics 2(2), 99–124 (2003)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Michalke, A.: On the inviscid instability of the hyperbolic-tangent velocity profile. J. Fluid Mech. 19, 543–556 (1964)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Gloerfelt, X.: Cavity Noise. In: Aerodynamic noise from wall-bounded flows, VKI lectures (2009)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Jameson, A., Schmidt, W., Turkel, E.: Numerical solutions of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using runge-Kutta time-stepping schemes. AIAA Paper 81–1259 (1981)Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Kim, J., Lee, D.: Optimized compact finite difference schemes with maximum resolution. AIAA J. 34(5), 887–893 (1996)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Tam, C., Webb, J.: Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics. J. Comput. Phys. 107, 262–281 (1993)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Berland, J., Lafon, P., Daude, F., Crouzet, F., Bogey, C., Bailly, C.: Filter shape dependence and effective scale separation in large-eddy simulations based on relaxation filtering. Comput. Fluids 47, 65–74 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Fauconnier, D., Bogey, C., Dick, E.: On the performance of relaxation filtering for large-eddy simulation. J. Turbulence 14(1), 22–49 (2013)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    de la Llave Plata, M., Couaillier, V., le Pape, M.C.: On the use of a high-order discontinuous Galerkin method for DNS and LES of wall-bounded turbulence. Comput. Fluids 000, 1–18 (2017). Article in PresszbMATHGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Manhart, M., Rapp, C., Peller, N., Breuer, M., Aybay, O., Denev, J., Falconi, C.: Assessment of eddy resolving techniques for the flow over periodically arranged hills up to Re= 37,000. In: M.E.A., Salvetti (ed.) Quality and Reliability of Large-Eddy Simulations II (2010), pp 361–370 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire DynFluidArts et Métiers ParisTechParisFrance

Personalised recommendations