Flow, Turbulence and Combustion

, Volume 98, Issue 3, pp 817–840 | Cite as

Large Eddy Simulations of Unconfined Non-reacting and Reacting Turbulent Low Swirl Jets

  • Mohammad Shahsavari
  • Mohammad Farshchi
  • Mohammad Hossien Arabnejad
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

The low swirl flow is a novel method for stabilizing lean premixed combustion to achieve low emissions of nitrogen oxides. Understanding the characteristics of low swirl flows is of both practical and fundamental interest. In this paper, in order to gain better insight into low swirl stabilized combustion, large eddy simulation and dynamically thickened flame combustion modeling are used to characterize various features of non-reacting and reacting low swirl flows including vortex breakdown, shear layers’ instability, and coherent structures. Furthermore, four test cases with different equivalence ratios are studied to evaluate the effects of equivalence ratio on the flame and flow characteristics. A finite volume scheme on a Cartesian grid with a dynamic one equation eddy viscosity subgrid model is used for large eddy simulations. The obtained results show that the combustion heat release and increase in equivalence ratio toward the stoichiometric value decrease the local swirl number of the flow field, while increasing the flow spreading at the burner outlet. Results show that the flame becomes W shaped as the equivalence ratio increases. Moreover, the combination of the swirling motion and combustion heat release temporally imposes a vortex breakdown in the post-flame region, which leads to occurrence of a transient recirculation zone. The temporal recirculation zone disappears downstream of the burner outlet due to merging of the inner shear layer from all sides at the centerline. Also, various analyses of shear layers’ wavy and vortical structures show that combustion heat release has the effect of decreasing the instability amplitude and vortex shedding frequency.

Keywords

Premixed low swirl flame Vortex breakdown Coherent structures Large eddy simulation Thickened flame model 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Dunn-Rankin, D.: Lean combustion: technology and control. Academic Press, Amsterdam (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Syred, N., Beer, J.M.: Combustion in swirling flows: A review. Combust. Flame 23, 143–201 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chan, R.K., Yegian, D.T., Miyasato, M.M., Samuelsen, G.S., Benson, C.E., Pellizzari, R., Loftus, P.: Scaling and development of low-swirl burners for low-emission furnaces and boilers. Proc. Combust. Inst. 28, 1305–1313 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johnson, M.R., Littlejohn, D., Nazeer, W.A., Smith, K.O., Cheng, R.K.: A comparison of the flowfields and emissions of high-swirl injectors and low-swirl injectors for lean premixed gas turbines. Proc. Combust. Inst. 30, 2867–2874 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huang, Y., Yang, V.: Dynamics and stability of lean-premixed swirl-stabilized combustion. Prog. Energy Comb. Sci. 35, 293–364 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheng, R.K.: Velocity and scalar characteristics of premixed turbulent flames stabilized by weak swirl. Combust. Flame 101, 1–14 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alekseenko, S.V., Dulin, V.M., Kozorezov, Y.S., Markovich, D.M., Shtork, S.I., Tokarev, M.P.: Flow structure of swirling turbulent propane flames. Flow, Turbul. Combust. 87, 569–595 (2011)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yegian, D.T., Cheng, R.K.: Development of a lean premixed low-swirl burner for low NO X practical application. Combust. Sci. Technol. 139, 207–227 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    BagheriSadeghi, N., Shahsavari, M., Farshchi, M.: Experimental characterization of response of lean premixed low-swirl flames to acoustic excitations. Int. J. Spray Combust. Dyn. 5, 309–328 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Panda, J., McLaughlin, D.K.: Experiments on the instabilities of a swirling jet. Phys. Fluids 6, 263–276 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sarpkaya, T.: Turbulent vortex breakdown. Phys. Fluids 7, 2301–2303 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lu, X., Wang, S. h., Sung, H., Hsieh, Sh.Y., Yang, V.: Large-eddy simulations of turbulent swirling flows injected into a dump chamber. J. Fluid Mech. 527, 171–195 (2005)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang, P., Bai, X.S., Wessman, M., Klingmann, J.: Large eddy simulation and experimental studies of a confined turbulent swirling flow. Phys. Fluids 16, 3306–3324 (2004)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Froud, D., O’Doherty, T., Syred, N.: Phase averaging of the precessing vortex core in a swirl burner under piloted and premixed combustion conditions. Combust. Flame 100, 407–412 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frohlich, J., Garcia-Villalba, M., Rodi, W.: Scalar mixing and large-scale coherent structures in a turbulent swirling jet. Flow, Turbul. Combust. 80, 47–59 (2008)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liang, H., Maxworthy, T.: An experimental investigation of swirling jets. J. Fluid Mech. 525, 115–159 (2005)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Garcia-Villalba, M., Frohlich, J., Rodi, W.: Identification and analysis of coherent structures in the near field of a turbulent unconfined annular swirling jet using large eddy simulation. Phys. Fluids 18, 1–17 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chanaud, R.C.: Observations of oscillatory motion in certain swirling flows. J. Fluid Mech. 21, 111–127 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Syred, N.: A review of oscillation mechanisms and the role of the precessing vortex core (PVC) in swirl combustion systems. Prog. Energy Comb. Sci. 32, 93–161 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wegner, B., Staufer, M., Sadiki, A., Janicka, J.: Study of flow and mixing in a generic GT combustor using LES. Flow, Turbul. Combust. 79, 389–403 (2007)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jones, W.P., Lyra, S., Navarro-Martines, S.: Large eddy simulation of turbulent confined highly swirling annular flows. Flow, Turbul. Combust. 89, 361–384 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ranga Dinesh, K.K.J., Kirkpatrick, M.P., Jenkins, K.W.: Investigation of the influence of swirl on a confined coannular swirl jet. Comput. Fluids 39, 756–767 (2010)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cheng, R.K., Littlejohn, D.: Effects of combustor geometry on the flowfields and flame properties of a low swirl injector. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2008: Power for Land, Sea and Air GT2008, pp. 393–407 (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cheng, R.K., Littlejohn, D., Nazeer, W.A., Smith, K.O.: Laboratory studies of the flow field characteristics of low swirl injectors for adaptation to fuel-flexible turbines. J. Eng. Gas Turbine Power 130(021501), 1–10 (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cheng, R.K., Littlejohn, D.: Laboratory study of premixed H 2-air and H 2-N 2-air flames in a low-swirl injector for ultra-low emissions gas turbines. J. Eng. Gas Turbine Power 130(031503), 1–9 (2008)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Littlejohn, D., Cheng, R.K., Noble, D., Lieuwen, T.: Laboratory investigations of low-swirl injectors operating with syngases. J. Eng. Gas Turbine Power 132(011502), 1–8 (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nogenmyr, K.J., Petersson, P., Bai, X.S., Nauert, A., Olofsson, J., Brackman, C., Seyfried, H., Zetterberg, J., Li, Z.S., Richter, M., Dreizler, A., Linne, M., Alden, M.: Large eddy simulation and experiments of stratified lean premixed methane/air turbulent flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 31, 1467–1475 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nogenmyr, K.J., Petersson, P., Bai, X.S., Fureby, C., Collin, R., Lantz, A., Linne, M., Alden, M.: Structure and stabilization mechanism of a stratified premixed low swirl flame. Proc. Combust. Inst. 33, 1567–1574 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nogenmyr, K.J., Fureby, C., Bai, X.S., Petersson, P., Collin, R., Linne, M.: Large eddy simulation and laser diagnostic studies on a low swirl stratified premixed flame. Combust. Flame 156, 25–36 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sagaut, P.: Large eddy simulation for incompressible flows. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Smagorinsky, J.: General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. Mon. Wea. Rev. 91, 99–165 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P., Cabot, W.: A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys. Fluids 3, 1760–1765 (1991)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Poinsot, T., Veynante, D.: Theoretical and numerical combustion. Edwards, Philadelphia (2005)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Colin, O., Ducros, F., Veynante, D., Poinsot, T.: A thickened flame model for large eddy simulations of turbulent premixed combustion. Phys. Fluids 12, 1843–1863 (2000)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Durand, L., Polifke, W.: Implementation of the thickened flame model for large eddy simulation of turbulent premixed combustion in a commercial solver. ASME Paper No. GT2007, 28188 (2007)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Proch, F., Kempf, M.A.: Numerical analysis of the Cambridge stratified flame series using artificial thickened flame LES with tabulated premixed flame chemistry. Combust. Flame 161, 2627–2646 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Strakey, P.A., Eggenspieler, G.: Development and validation of a thickened flame modeling approach for large eddy simulation of premixed combustion. J. Eng. Gas Turbine Power 132(071501), 1–9 (2010)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nogenmyr, K.J., Bai, X., Fureby, C., Petersson, P., Collin, R., Linne, M., Aldn, M.: A comparative study of LES turbulent combustion models applied to a low swirl lean premixed burner, pp. 1–14. 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Nevada, USA (513) (2008)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Petersson, P., Olofsson, J., Brackman, C., Seyfried, H., Zetterberg, J., Richter, M., Alden, M., Linne, M.A., Cheng, R.K., Nauert, A., Geyer, D., Dreizler, A.: Simultaneous PIV, OH-PLIF, Rayleigh thermometry OH-PLIF and stereo PIV measurements in a low-swirl flame. Appl. Opt. 46, 3928–3936 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bearman, P.W.: Investigation of the flow behind a two-dimensional model with a blunt trailing edge and fitted with splitter plates. J. Fluid Mech. 21, 241–255 (1965)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kornev, N., Kroger, H., Turnow, J., Hassel, E.: Synthesis of an artificial turbulent fields with prescribed second-order statistics using the random-spot method. J. Appl. Math. Mech. 7, 47–48 (2007)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Galpin, J., Naudin, A., Vervisch, L., Angelberger, Ch., Colin, O., Domingo, P.: Large-eddy simulation of a fuel-lean premixed turbulent swirl-burner. Combust. Flame 155, 247–266 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shahsavari, M., Aravind, I.B., Chakravarthy, S.R., Farshchi, M. Experimental Study of Lean Premixed Low Swirl Flame under Acoustic Excitations, International Symposium: Thermoacoustic Instabilities in Gas Turbines and Rocket Engines: Industry Meets Academia, Munich, Germany, GTRE 029 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Shahsavari
    • 1
  • Mohammad Farshchi
    • 1
  • Mohammad Hossien Arabnejad
    • 1
  1. 1.Aerospace Engineering DepartmentSharif University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations