Flow, Turbulence and Combustion

, Volume 98, Issue 2, pp 367–388 | Cite as

Helical Structures in the Near Field of a Turbulent Pipe Jet

Article

Abstract

We perform a finely resolved Large-eddy simulation to study coherent vortical structures populating the initial (near-nozzle) zone of a pipe jet at the Reynolds number of 5300. In contrast to ‘top-hat’ jets featured by Kelvin-Helmholtz rings with the non-dimensional frequency S t≈0.3−0.6, no high-frequency dominant mode is observed in the near field of a jet issuing from a fully-developed pipe flow. Instead, in shear layers we observe a relatively wide peak in the power spectrum within the low-frequency range (S t≈0.14) corresponding to the propagating helical waves entering with the pipe flow. This is confirmed by the Fourier transform with respect to the azimuthal angle and the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition complemented with the linear stability analysis revealing that this low-frequency motion is not connected to the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. We demonstrate that the azimuthal wavenumbers m=1−5 contain the most of the turbulent kinetic energy and that a common form of an eigenmode is a helical vortex rotating around the axis of symmetry. Small and large timescales are identified corresponding to “fast” and “slow” rotating modes. While the “fast” modes correspond to background turbulence and stochastically switch from co- to counter-rotation, the “slow” modes are due to coherent helical structures which are long-lived and have low angular velocities, in agreement with the previously described spectral peak at low S t.

Keywords

Jets Vortex dynamics Helical structures 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is funded by the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 14-19-01685. The computational resources are provided by Siberian Supercomputer Center SB RAS (Novosibirsk) and Joint Supercomputer Center RAS (Moscow). The authors thank R. Sandberg for providing the DNS data and the referees for numerous valuable comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Pope, SB: Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gutmark, EJ, Greenstein, FF: Flow control with noncircular jets. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 31, 239–272 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ginevsky, AS, Vlasov, YV, Karavosov, RK: Acoustic control of turbulent jets. Springer (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Samimy, M, Kim, JH, Kastner, J, Utkin, IAY: Active control of high-speed and high-Reynolds-number jets using plasma actuators. J. Fluid Mech. 578, 305–330 (2005)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ball, CG, Fellouah, H, Pollard, A: The flow field in turbulent round free jets. Prog. Aero Sci. 50, 1–26 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Becker, HA, Massaro, TA: Vortex evolution in a round jet. J. Fluid Mech. 31 (3), 435–448 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crow, SC, Champagne, FH: Orderly structure in jet turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 48(3), 547–591 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Michalke, A: Survey on jet instability theory. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 21, 159–199 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yule, AJ: Large-scale structure in the mixing layer of a round jet. J. Fluid Mech. 89(3), 413–432 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gutmark, E, Ho, CM: Preferred modes and the spreading rates of jets. Phys. Fluids 26, 2932 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garnaud, X, Lesshafft, L, Schmid, PJ, Huerre, P: The preferred mode of incompressible jets: linear frequency response analysis. J. Fluid Mech. 716, 189–202 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mi, J, Nobes, DS, Nathan, GJ: Influence of jet exit conditions on the passive scalar field of an axisymmetric free jet. J. Fluid Mech. 432, 91–125 (2001)MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Antonia, RA, Zhao, Q: Effect of initial conditions on a circular jet. Exp. Fluids 31, 319–323 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xu, G, Antonia, RA: Effect of different initial conditions on a turbulent round free jet. Exp. Fluids 33, 677–683 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boguslawski, L, Popiel, CO: Flow structure of the free round turbulent jet in the initial region. J. Fluid Mech. 90(3), 531–539 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lockwood, FC, Moneib, HA: Fluctuating temperature measurements in a heated round free jet. Comb. SciTech. 22, 63–81 (1980)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pitts, WM, Kashiwagi, T: The application of laser-induced Rayleigh light scattering to the study of turbulent mixing. J. Fluid Mech. 141, 391–429 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Örlü, R, Alfredsson, PH: An experimental study of the near-field mixing characteristics of a swirling jet. Flow Turb. Comb. 80, 323–350 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kozlov, VV, Grek, GR, Dovgal, AV, Litvinenko, YA: Stability of subsonic jet flows. J. Flow Control Meas Vis. 1, 94–101 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zarruk, GA, Cowen, EA: Simultaneous velocity and passive scalar concentration measurements in low Reynolds number neutrally buoyant turbulent round jets. Exp. Fluids 44, 865–872 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vouros, AP, Panidis, T: Turbulent properties of a low Reynolds number, axisymmetric, pipe jet. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 44, 42–50 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Capone, A, Soldati, A, Romano, GP: Mixing and entrainment in the near field of turbulent round jets. Exp. Fluids 54(1), 1–14 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Duggleby, A, Ball, KS, Paul, MR, Fischer, PF: Dynamical eigenfunction decomposition of turbulent pipe flow. J. Turbulence 8(43), 1–24 (2007)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gudmundsson, K, Colonius, T: Instability wave models for the near-field fluctuations of turbulent jets. J. Fluid Mech. 689, 97–128 (2011)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Oberleithner, K, Seiber, M, Nayeri, CN, Paschereit, CO, Petz, C, Hege, HC, Noack, BR, Wygnanski, I: Three-dimensional coherent structures in a swirling jet undergoing vortex breakdown: stability analysis and empirical mode construction. J. Fluid Mech. 679, 383–414 (2011)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ryu, J, Lele, SK: Instability waves in high-speed jets: Near-and far-field DNS/LES data analysis. Int. J. Aeroacoust. 14(3–4), 643–674 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lumley, JL: The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows. In: Atmospheric turbulence and radio wave propagation, pp. 166–178. Nauka (1967)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cintriniti, JH, George, WK: Reconstruction of the global velocity field in the axisymmetric mixing layer utilizing the proper orthogonal decomposition. J. Fluid Mech. 418, 137–166 (2000)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jung, D, Gamard, S, George, WK: Downstream evolution of the most energetic modes in a turbulent axisymmetric jet at high Reynolds number. Part 1. The near-field region. J. Fluid Mech. 514, 173–204 (2004)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gamard, S, Jung, D, George, WK: Downstream evolution of the most energetic modes in a turbulent axisymmetric jet at high Reynolds number. Part 2. The far-field region. J. Fluid Mech. 514, 205–230 (2004)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Iqbal, MO, Thomas, FO: Coherent structure in a turbulent jet via a vector implementation of the proper orthogonal decomposition. J. Fluid Mech. 571, 281–326 (2007)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wänström, M, George, WK, Meyer, KE: Stereoscopic PIV and POD applied to the far turbulent axisymmetric jet. AIAA Paper, 2006–3368 (2006)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Freund, JB: Noise sources in a low-Reynolds-number turbulent jet at mach 0.9. J. Fluid Mech. 438, 277–305 (2001)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Freund, JB, Colonius, T: Turbulence and sound-field POD analysis of a turbulent jet. Int. J. Aeroacoust. 8, 337–354 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bogey, C, Bailly, C: Large eddy simulations of transitional round jets: Influence of the Reynolds number on flow development and energy dissipation. Phys. Fluids 18, 065,101 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Vuorinen, V, Tirunagari, JYS, Kaario, O, Larmi, M, Duwig, C, Boersma, BJ: Large-eddy simulation of highly underexpanded transient gas jets. Phys. Fluids 25, 016,101 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bodony, DJ, Lele, SK: On using large-eddy simulation for the prediction of noise from cold and heated turbulent jets. Phys. Fluids 17, 085,103 (2005)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ryu, J: Study of high-speed turbulent jet noise using decomposition methods. PhD thesis, Stanford University, USA (2010)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ryu, J, Lele, SK, Viswanathan, K: Study of supersonic wave components in high-speed turbulent jets using an LES database. J. Sound Vibr. 333, 6900–6923 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mullyadzhanov, R, Hadžiabdić, M, Hanjalić, K: LES investigation of the hysteresis regime in the cold model of a rotating-pipe swirl burner. Flow Turb. Comb. 94(1), 175–198 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Eggels, JG, Unger, F, Weiss, MH, Westerweel, J, Adrian, RJ, Friedreich, F, Nieuwstadt, FTM: Fully developed turbulent pipe flow: A comparison between direct numerical simulation and experiment. J. Fluid Mech. 268, 175–209 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wu, X, Moin, P: A direct numerical simulation study on the mean velocity characteristics in turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 608, 81–112 (2008)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ferdman, E, Ötügen, M V, Kim, S: Effect of initial velocity profile on the development of round jets. J. Prop. Power 16(4), 676–686 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kim, J, Choi, H: Large eddy simulation of a circular jet: Effect of inflow conditions on the near field. J. Fluid Mech. 620, 383–411 (2009)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sandberg, RD, Sandham, ND, Suponitsky, V: DNS of compressible pipe flow exiting into a coflow. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 35, 33–44 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Oberleithner, K, Terhaar, S, Rukes, L, Paschereit, CO: Why nonuniform density suppresses the precessing vortex core. J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power 135(12), 121,506 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Khorrami, MR, Malik, MR, Ash, RL: Application of spectral collocation techniques to the stability of swirling flows. J. Comp. Phys. 81(1), 206–229 (1989)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Oberleithner, K, Paschereit, CO, Seele, R, Wygnanski, I: Formation of turbulent vortex breakdown: intermittency, criticality, and global instability. AIAA Paper 50(7), 1437–1452 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chatterjee, A: An introduction to the proper orthogonal decomposition. Curr. Sci. 78(7), 808–817 (2000)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Petersen, RA, Samet, MM: On the preferred mode of jet instability. J. Fluid Mech. 194, 153–173 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Michalke, A, Herman, G: On the inviscid instability of a circular jet with external flow. J. Fluid Mech. 114, 343–359 (1982)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Batchelor, GK, Gill, AE: Analysis of the stability of axisymmetric jets. J. Fluid Mech. 14(4), 529–551 (1962)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Davoust, S, Jacquin, L, Leclaire, B: Dynamics of m=0 and m=1 modes and of streamwise vortices in a turbulent axisymmetric mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 709, 408–444 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Sirovich, L, Ball, KS, Keefe, LR: Plane waves and structures in turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids A 2, 2217–2226 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ball, KS, Sirovich, L, Keefe, LR: Dynamical eigenfunction decomposition of turbulent channel flow. Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids 12, 585–604 (1991)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Sirovich, L, Ball, KS, Handler, RA: Propagating structures in wall-bounded turbulent flows. Theor. Comp. Fluid Dyn. 2, 307–317 (1991)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Mullyadzhanov
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Abdurakipov
    • 1
    • 2
  • K. Hanjalić
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Thermophysics SB RASNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Novosibirsk State UniversityNovosibirskRussia
  3. 3.Delft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations