Flow, Turbulence and Combustion

, Volume 93, Issue 1, pp 93–124 | Cite as

Modeling of Non-Equilibrium Homogeneous Turbulence in Rapidly Compressed Flows

  • Peter E. HamlingtonEmail author
  • Matthias Ihme


The response of homogeneous turbulence to rapid mean-flow compression in idealized internal combustion engines and rapid compression machines is examined using a hierarchy of closure models for the Reynolds stress anisotropy. This hierarchy is based on a Reynolds stress anisotropy transport equation that is modeled from the exact transport equation for the anisotropy. The hierarchy of models includes a recently-developed non-equilibrium model, which is shown to be in good agreement with more computationally-complex fully differential models. Using this hierarchical approach, the flow physics addressed by each closure is identified and closure accuracy is shown to depend on the degree to which non-equilibrium turbulent flow effects are captured. We examine the evolution of the turbulence kinetic energy, Reynolds stresses, and anisotropy as a function of the degree of non-equilibrium in the flow, which is parameterized by the ratio of characteristic turbulence and mean-flow deformation time scales. By comparing model results to results obtained from rapid distortion theory and higher level closures, prescriptions are provided for the applicability of different closure models based on the magnitude of the non-equilibrium parameter. The theoretical analysis is complemented by comparisons of simulation results with previously established direct numerical simulations for a one-dimensional compression. Finally, we connect these prescriptions with experimental measurements of turbulent and mean-flow time scales for internal combustion engines operating at realistic conditions.


Turbulence modeling Internal combustion engines Rapid compression machines Rapid distortion theory 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Batchelor, G.K., Proudman, I.: The effect of rapid distortion of a fluid in turbulent motion. Q. J. Appl. Math. 7, 83–103 (1954)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hunt, J.C.R.: A review of the theory of rapidly distorted turbulent flows and its applications. Fluid Dyn. Trans. 9, 121–152 (1977)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hunt, J.C.R., Carruthers, D.J.: Rapid distortion theory and the ‘problems’ of turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 212, 497–532 (1990)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Durbin, P.A., Pettersson, B. A. R.: Statistical Theory and Modeling for Turbulent Flows. Wiley (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jacquin, L, Cambon, C., Blin, E.: Turbulence amplification by a shock wave and rapid distortion theory. Phys. Fluids A 5(2539–2550) (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coleman, G.N., Mansour, N.N.: Modeling the rapid spherical compression of isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids A 3, 2255–2259 (1991)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Durbin, P.A., Zeman, O.: Rapid distortion theory for homogeneous compressed turbulence with application to modelling. J. Fluid Mech. 242, 349–370 (1992)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blaisdell, G.A., Coleman, G.N., Mansour, N.N.: Rapid distortion theory for compressible homogeneous turbulence under isotropic mean strain. Phys. Fluids 8(2692–2705) (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yu, H., Girimaji, S. S.: Extension of compressible ideal-gas rapid distortion theory to general mean velocity gradients. Phys. Fluids 19(04), 2007 (1702)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yu, D., Girimaji, S.S.: Direct numerical simulations of homogeneous turbulence subject to periodic shear. J. Fluid Mech. 566, 117–151 (2006)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen, J., Meneveau, C., Katz, J.: Scale interactions of turbulence subjected to a straining-relaxation-destraining cycle. J. Fluid Mech. 562, 123–150 (2006)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Townsend, A.A.: The uniform distortion of homogeneous turbulence. Q. J. Appl. Math. 7, 104–127 (1954)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Keffer, J.F.: The uniform distortion of a turbulent wake. J. Fluid Mech. 22(135–159) (1965)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tucker, H.J., Reynolds, A.J.: The distortion of turbulence by irrotational plane strain. J. Fluid Mech. 32(657–673) (1968)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reynolds, A.J., Tucker, H.J.: The distortion of turbulence by general uniform irrotational strain. J. Fluid Mech. 68(673–693) (1975)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gence, J.N., Mathieu, J.: The return to isotropy of a homogeneous turbulence having been submitted to two successive plane strains. J. Fluid Mech. 101, 555 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen, J., Meneveau, C., Katz, J.: Implication of mismatch between stress and strain-rate in turbulence subjected to rapid straining and destraining on dynamic LES models. J. Fluids Eng. 127, 840–850 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu, S., Katz, J., Menveau, C.: Evolution and modelling of subgrid scales during rapid straining of turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 387, 281–320 (1999)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gualtieri, P., Meneveau, C.: Direct numerical simulations of turbulence subjected to a staining and destraining cycle. Phys. Fluids 22(065104) (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Larsson, J., Bermejo-Moreno, I., Lele, S.K: Reynolds- and Mach-number effects in canonical shock-turbulence interaction. J. Fluid Mech. 717, 293–321 (2013)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wu, C.-T., Ferziger, J.H., Chapman, D.R.: Simulation and modeling of homogeneous, compressed turbulence. Proc. 5th Symp. on Turb. Shear Flows 17, 13–19 (1985)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Le Penven, L., Serre, G.: Homogeneous turbulence submitted to compression, experimental study and modelling. Proc. 9th Symp. on Turb. Shear Flows (1993)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jakirlić, S., Volkert, J., Pascal, H., Hanjalić, K., Tropea, C.: DNS, experimental and modeling study of axially compressed in-cylinder swirling flow. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 21, 627–639 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hadžić, I., Hanjalić, K., Laurence, D.: Modeling the response of turbulence subjected to cyclic irrotational strain. Phys. Fluids 13(6), 1739–1747 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Revell, A.J., Benhamadouche, S., Craft, T., Laurence, D.: A stress-strain lag eddy viscosity model for unsteady mean flow. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 27, 821–830 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hamlington, P.E., Dahm, W.J.A.: Reynolds stress closure for nonequilibrium effects in turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids 20, 115101 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hamlington, P.E., Dahm, W.J.A.: Frequency response of periodically sheared homogeneous turbulence. Phys. Fluids 21, 055107 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Launder, B.E., Reece, G., Rodi, W.: Progress in the development of a Reynolds stress turbulence closure. J. Fluid Mech. 68, 537–566 (1975)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Speziale, C.G.: Analytical methods for the development of Reynolds-stress closures in turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23, 107–157 (1991)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhao, F., Asmus, T.W., Assanis, D.N., Dec, J.E., Eng, J.A., Najt, P.M. (eds.) Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) Engines: Key Research and Development Issues. Society of Autmotive Engineers International, Warrendale, PA (2003)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dec, J.E.: Advanced compression-ignition engines – understanding the in-cylinder processes. Proc. Comb. Inst. 32, 2727–2742 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Guibert, P., Keromnes, A., Legros, G.: An experimental investigation of the turbulence effect on the combustion propagation in a rapid compression machine. Flow Turb. Combust. 84(1), 79–95 (2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ihme, M.: On the role of turbulence and compositional fluctuations in rapid compression machines: Autoignition of syngas mixtures. Combust. Flame 159(4), 1592–1604 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Han, Z., Reitz, R.D.: Turbulence modeling of internal combustion engines using RNG k- ε models. Combust. Sci. Tech. 106, 267–295 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bianchi, G.M., Pelloni, P., Zhu, G.-S., Reitz, R. On Non-Equilibrium Turbulence Corrections in Multidimensional HSDI Diesel Engine Computations. SAE Tech. Paper Ser., 2001-01-0997 (2001)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yang, S. L., Peschke, B. D., Hanjalić, K.: Second-moment closure model for ic engine flow simulation using kiva code. J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power 122, 355–363 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yang, S.L., Siow, Y.K., Teo, C.Y., Hanjalić, K.: A KIVA code with Reynolds-stress model for engine flow simulation. Energy 30, 427–445 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jakirlic, S., Tropea, C., Hadzić, I., Pascal, H., Hanjalić, K.: Computational Study of Joint Effects of Shear, Compression and Swirl on Flow and Turbulence in a Valveless Piston-Cylinder Assembly. SAE Tech. Paper Ser. 2001-01-1236 (2001)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Amini, B., Zoka, H. M., Khaleghi, H.: A Comparative assessment of variant kε models for engine flow applications. IEEE Int. Conf. Comp. Inf. Sci. 2011, 23 (2011). doi: 10.1109/ICCIS Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zoka, H.M., Omidvar, A., Khaleghi, H.: On the performance of various Reynolds stress models in resolving non-equilibrium features of turbulent in-cylinder engine flows. Arab J. Sci. Eng. (2012). doi: 10.1007/s13369-012-0477-x Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zoka, H. M., Omidvar, A., Khaleghi, H.: A comparative assessment of a compressible Reynolds stress model and some variant kε models for engine flow applications. Arab J. Sci. Eng. 37, 1737–1749 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Speziale, C.G., So, R.M.C: The Handbook of Fluid Dynamics, chapter 14, Turbulence Modeling and Simulation, pp. 14.1–14.111. Springer (1998)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gatski, T.B., Jongen, T.: Nonlinear eddy viscosity and algebraic stress models for solving complex turbulent flows. Prog. Aero. Sci. 36, 655–682 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Johansson, A.V.: Engineering turbulence models and their development, with emphasis on explicit algebraic Reynolds stress models. Theories of Turbulence - CISM Courses and Lectures - No. 442, pp. 253–300. Springer (2002)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pope, S.B: Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press (2000)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kolmogorov, A. N.: The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 30, 299–303 (1941)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rotta, J: Statistische Theorie nichthomogener Turbulenz. Z. für Phys. 129, 547–572 (1951)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Speziale, C.G., Sarkar, S., Gatski, T.B.: Modeling the pressure strain correlation of turbulence: An invariant dynamical systems approach. J. Fluid Mech. 227, 245–272 (1991)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hanjalić, K.: Advanced turbulence closure models: A view of current status and future prospects. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 15(3), 178–203 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Olsen, M.E., Coakley, T.J.: The lag model, a turbulence model for nonequilibrium flows. AIAA Paper, 2001–2564 (2001)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Launder, B.E., Spalding, D.B.: The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 3, 269–289 (1974)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wilcox, D.C: Turbulence Modeling for CFD, DCW Industries (2000)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Taulbee, D.B.: An improved algebraic Reynolds stress model and corresponding nonlinear stress model. Phys. Fluids A 4(11), 2555–2561 (1992)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Gatski, T.B., Speziale, C.G.: On explicit algebraic stress models for complex turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 254, 59–78 (1993)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Shih, T.H., Zhu, J., Lumley, J.L.: A new Reynolds stress algebraic equation model. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 125, 287–302 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Crow, S.C.: Visco-elastic character of fine-grained isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 10(7), 1587–1589 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Crow, S. C.: Viscoelastic properties of fine-grained incompressible turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 33, 1–20 (1968)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Shampine, L.F., Reichelt, M.W.: The Matlab ODE suite. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 18, 1–22 (1997)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Heywood, J.B: Internal combustion engine fundamentals. McGraw Hill (1989)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Liou, T.-M., Santavicca, D. A.: Cycle resolved LDV measurements in a motored IC engine. J. Fluids Eng. 107, 232–240 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Lancaster, D. R.: Effects of engine variables on turbulence in a spark-ignition engine. SAE Paper 760159, 671–688 (1976)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Hong, C.W., Tarng, S.D.: Direct measurement and computational analysis of turbulence length scales of a motored engine. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 16, 277–285 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Glover, A.R., Hundleby, G.E., Hadded, O. (1988)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Fraser, R.A., Bracco, R.A.: Cycle-resolved LDV integral length scale measurements investigating clearance height scaling, isotropy, and homogeneity in an I.C. engine, SAE Paper 890615 (1989)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Corcione, F.E., Valention, G.: Turbulence length scale measurements by two-probe-volume LDA technique in a Diesel engine, SAE Paper 902080 (1990)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Ikegami, M., Shioji, M., Nishimoto, K.: Turbulence intensity and spatial integral scale during compression and expansion strokes in a four-cycle reciprocating engine, SAE Paper 870372 (1987)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Obokata, T., Hashimoto, T., Gojuki, S., Karasawa, T., Shiga, S., Kurabayashi, T.: LDA characterization of gas flow in a combustion chamber of a four-stroke S.I. engine, SAE Paper 920519 (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  2. 2.Center for Turbulence Research, Department of Mechanical EngineeringStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations