Advertisement

Flow, Turbulence and Combustion

, Volume 92, Issue 1–2, pp 527–542 | Cite as

Large Eddy Simulation of Flow Control Around a Cube Subjected to Momentum Injection

  • Xingsi Han
  • Siniša KrajnovićEmail author
Article
  • 426 Downloads

Abstract

The concept of Momentum Injection (MI) through Moving Surface Boundary layer Control (MSBC) applied to a cubic structure is numerically studied using Large Eddy Simulation at a Reynolds number of 6.7×104. Two small rotating cylinders are used to add the momentum at the front vertical edges of the cube. Two configurations are studied with the yaw angle of 0° and 30°, respectively, with ratio of the rotation velocity of cylinders and the freestream velocity of 2. The results suggest that MI delays the boundary layer separation and reattachment, and thus reduces the drag. A drag reduction of about 6.2 % is observed in the 0° yaw angle case and about 44.1 % reduction in the 30° yaw angle case. In the case of 0° yaw angle, the main change of the flow field is the disappearance of the separation regions near the rotating cylinders and the wake region is slightly changed due to MI. In the 30° yaw angle case, the flow field is changed a lot. Large flow separations near one rotating cylinder and in the wake is significantly reduced, which results in the large drag reduction. Meanwhile, the yaw moment is increased about 50.5 %.

Keywords

Active flow control LES Drag reduction Vehicle aerodynamics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Spalart, P.R., Mclean., J.D.: Drag reduction: enticing turbulence, and then an industry. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369, 1556–1569 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choi, H., Jeon, W.P., Kim, J.: Control of flow over a bluff body. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40, 113–139 (2008)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Klumpp, S., Meinke, M., Schröder, W.: Numerical simulation of riblet controlled spatial transition in a zero-pressure-gradient boundary layer. Flow Turbulence Combust. 85, 57–71 (2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kuya, Y., Takeda, K., Zhang, X., Beeton, S., Pandaleon, T.: Flow separation control on a race car wing with vortex generators in ground effect. ASME J. Fluids Eng. 131, 121102 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huang, R.F., Cheng, J.C., Chen, J.K., Hsu, C.M.: Manipulating flow to reduce drag of a square cylinder by using a self-sustained vibrating rod. ASME J. Fluids Eng. 133, 051202 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ben-Hamou, E., Arad, E., Seifert, A.: Generic transport Aft-body drag reduction using active flow control. Flow Turbulence Combust. 78, 365–382 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krajnović, S., Östh, J., Basara, B.: LES study of breakdown control of A-pillar vortex. Int. J. Flow Control 2, 237–258 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krajnović, S., Fernandes, J.: Numerical simulation of the flow around a simplified vehicle model with active flow control. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 32, 192–200 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lengani, D., Simoni, D., Ubaldi, M., Zunino, P., Bertini, F.: Application of a synthetic jet to control boundary layer separation under ultra-high-lift turbine pressure distribution. Flow Turbulence Combust. (2011). doi: 10.1007/s10494-011-9346-z zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Modi, V.J., Fernando, M.S.U.K., Yokomizo, T.: Moving surface boundary layer control as applied to two-dimensional and three-dimensional bluff bodies. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 38, 83–92 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Modi, V.J., Deshpande, V.S.: Fluid dynamics of a cubic structure as affected by momentum injection and height. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 89, 445–470 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beaudoin, J.F., Cadot, O., Aider, J.L., Wesfreid, J.E.: Bluff-body drag reduction by extremum-seeking control. J. Fluids Struct. 22, 973–978 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beaudoin, J.F., Cadot, O., Aider, J.L., Wesfreid, J.E.: Drag reduction of a bluff body using adaptive control methods. Phys. Fluids 18, 085107 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Muddada, S., Patnaik, B.S.V.: An assessment of turbulence models for the prediction of flow past a circular cylinder with momentum injection. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 98, 575–591 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Modi, V.J., Mokhtarian, F., Fernando, M.S.U.K., Yokomizo, T.: Moving surface boundary-layer control as applied to two-dimensional airfoils. J. Aircr. 28, 104–112 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Modi, V.J., Munshi, S.R., Bandyopadhayay, G., Yokomizo, T.: High performance airfoil with moving surface boundary-layer control. J. Aircr. 35, 544–553 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Munshi, S.R., Modi, V.J., Yokomizo, T.: Aerodynamics and dynamics of rectangular prisms with momentum injection. J. Fluids Struct. 11, 873–892 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Modi, V.J.: Moving surface boundary-layer control: a review. J. Fluids Struct. 11, 627–663 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Munshi, S.R., Modi, V.J., Yokomizo, T.: Fluid dynamics of flat plates and rectangular prisms in the presence of moving surface boundary-layer control. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 79, 37–60 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Modi, V.J., Akinturk, A.: Effect of momentum injection on drag reduction of a barge-like structure. Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng. 13, 81–87 (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Korkischko, I., Meneghini, J.R.: Suppression of vortex-induced vibration using moving surface boundary-layer control. J. Fluids Struct. 34, 259–270 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhuang, Y., Sun, X., Huang, D., Wu, G.: Numerical study on aerodynamic performances of the wind turbine rotor with leading-edge rotation. J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 4, 063103 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Martinuzzi, R., Tropea, C.: The flow around surface-mounted prismatic obstacles placed in a fully developed channel flow. ASME J. Fluids Eng. 115, 85–91 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Krajnović, S., Davidson, L.: Large-eddy simulation of the flow around a bluff body. AIAA J. 40, 927–936 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hwang, J.Y., Yang, K.S.: Numerical study of vortical structures around a wall-mounted cubic obstacle in channel flow. Phys. Fluids 16, 2382–2394 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schmidt, S., Thiele, F.: Comparison of numerical methods applied to the flow over wall-mounted cubes. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 23, 330–339 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang, H.F., Zhou, Y., Mi, J.: Effects of aspect ratio on the drag of a wall-mounted finite-length cylinder in subcritical and critical regimes. Exp. Fluids (2012). doi: 10.1007/s00348-012-1299-z Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kobayashi, H.: The subgrid-scale models based on coherent structures for rotating homogeneous turbulence and turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 17, 045104 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kobayashi, H., Ham, F., Wu, X.: Application of a local sgs model based on coherent structures to complex geometries. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 29, 640–653 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    AVL AST, FIRE manual, Ver. 2011, AVL List GmbH, Graz, Austria (2011)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Krajnović, S., Davidson, L.: Flow around a simplified car, part 1: large eddy simulation. ASME J. Fluids Eng. 127, 907–918 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Krajnović, S., Davidson, L.: Flow around a simplified car, part 2: understanding the flow. ASME J. Fluids Eng. 127, 919–928 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Östh, J., Krajnović, S.: The flow around a simplified tractor-trailor model studied by large eddy simulation. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 102, 36–47 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Krajnović, S.: Flow around a tall finite cylinder explored by large eddy simulation. J. Fluid Mech. 676, 294–317 (2011)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Fluid Dynamics, Department of Applied MechanicsChalmers University of TechnologyGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations