Advertisement

Numerical Simulations of High-Speed Turbulent Cavity Flows

  • G. N. Barakos
  • S. J. Lawson
  • R. Steijl
  • P. Nayyar
Article

Abstract

Detached-Eddy Simulations (DES) of flows over clean and controlled cavities with and without doors are presented in this paper. Mach and Reynolds numbers (based on cavity length) were 0.85 and one million respectively. Spectral analyses showed that the DES computations were able to correctly predict the frequencies of the Rossiter modes for both uncontrolled and controlled cases. Flow visualisations revealed that the impact of the shear layer formed along the cavity on a slanted aft wall no longer creates a large source of acoustic noise. Therefore little acoustic propagation was seen up the cavity. This was confirmed by the analysis of the cavity wall forces, which showed that the oscillations of the shear layer were reduced when the wall was slanted. This aided in reducing the overall Sound Pressure Levels throughout the cavity and far-field. Comparisons of the flow-fields suggested that the addition of the doors also aided in stabilising the shear layer, which was also shown in the analysis of the wall forces. As a result, the addition of the doors was found to affect the clean cavity configuration significantly more than the controlled one.

Keywords

Transonic cavity flow DES Flow control 

References

  1. 1.
    Roshko, A.: Some measurements of flow in a rectangular cut-out. Technical Report, NACA Technical Report 3488, California Institute of Technology, August (1955)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Krishnamurty, K.: Acoustic radiation from two-dimensional rectangular cutouts in aerodynamic surfaces. Technical Report Technical Note 3487, National Advisor Committee For Aeronautics, August (1955)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rossiter, J.E.: Wind tunnel experiments on the flow over rectangular cavities at subsonic and transonic speeds. Technical Report 64037, Royal Aircraft Establishment, October (1964)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ross, J.A., Peto, J.W.: Internal stores carriage research at RAE. Technical Report 2233, Royal Aircraft Establishment, January (1992)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ross, J.A.: Cavity acoustic measurements at high speeds. Technical Report DERA/MSS/MSFC2/TR000173, QinetiQ, March (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tracy, M.B., Plentovich, E.B.: Characterization of cavity flow fields using pressure data obtained in the Langley 0.3-meter transonic cryogenic tunnel. Technical Memorandum 4436, NASA, March (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rizzetta, D.P.: Numerical simulation of supersonic flow over a three-dimensional cavity. AIAA J. 26(7), 799–807 (1988)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lawrie, D.: Investigation of cavity flows at low and high Reynolds numbers using computational fluid dynamics. PhD Thesis, University of Glasgow (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Plentovich, E.B., Stallings, R.L. Jr., Tracy, M.B.: Experimental cavity pressure measurements at subsonic and transonic speeds. Technical Paper 3358, NASA (1993)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cattafesta, L.N. III, Song, Q., Williams, D.R., Rowley, C.W., Alvi, F.S.: Active control of flow-induced cavity oscillations. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 44(7–8), 479–502 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2008.07.002 (also AIAA-2003-3567)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nightingale, D.A., Ross, J.A., Foster, G.W.: Cavity unsteady pressure measurements—examples from wind-tunnel tests. Technical Report Version 3, Aerodynamics & Aeromechanics Systems Group, QinetiQ, November (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Badcock, K.J., Richards, B.E., Woodgate, M.A.: Elements of computational fluid dynamics on block structured grids using implicit solvers. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 36(5–6), 351–392 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nayyar, P., Barakos, G.N., Badcock, K.J.: Numerical study of transonic cavity flows using large-eddy and detached-eddy simulation. Aeronaut. J. 111(1117), 153–164 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Spalart, P.R., W-Jou, H., Strelets, M., Allmaras, S.R.: Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES aproach. In: Advances in DNS/LES, 1st AFOSR International Conference On DNS/LES, 4–8 August, Columbus, OH (1997)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spalart, P.R., Allmaras, S.R.: A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. Rech. Aerosp. 1, 5–1 (1994) (also paper AIAA-92-0439)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nayyar, P.: CFD analysis of transonic turbulent cavity flows. PhD Thesis, University of Glasgow, August (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Childers, D.G. (ed.): Modern Spectrum Analysis, chap. 2, pp. 23–148. IEEE, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Larchevêque, L., Sagaut, P., Lê, T.-H., Comte, P.: Large-eddy simulation of a compressible flow in a three-dimensional open cavity at high Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 516, 265–301 (2004)MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pierce, A.D.: Acoustics: an Introduction to its Physical Principles and Applications. Acoustical Society of America, Woodbury, New York (1989)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Peng, S.-H., Leicher, S.: DES and hybrid RANS-LES modelling of unsteady pressure oscillations and flow features in a rectangular cavity. In: Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics—Advances in Hybrid RANS-LES Modelling, vol. 97, pp. 132–141. Springer, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ashworth, R.M.: Prediction of acoustic resonance phenomena for weapons bays using detached eddy simulation. Aeronaut. J. 109(1102), 631–638 (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ashworth, R.: DES of a cavity with spoiler. In: Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics—Advances in Hybrid RANS-LES Modelling, vol. 97, pp. 162–171. Springer, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lai, H., Luo, K.H.: A three-dimensional hybrid LES-acoustic analogy method for predicting open-cavity noise. J. Flow Turbul. Combust. 79(1), 55–82 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Larchevêque, L., Sagaut, P., Labbe, O.: Large-eddy simulation of a subsonic cavity flow including asymmetric three-dimensional effects. J. Fluid Mech. 577, 105–126 (2007)MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kegerise, M.A., Spina, E.F., Garg, S., Cattafesta , L.N. III: Mode-switching and nonlinear effects in compressible flow over a cavity. Phys. Fluids 16(3), 678–686 (2004)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. N. Barakos
    • 1
  • S. J. Lawson
    • 1
  • R. Steijl
    • 1
  • P. Nayyar
    • 2
  1. 1.CFD Laboratory, Department of EngineeringUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.Aircraft Research AssociationBedfordUK

Personalised recommendations