Flow, Turbulence and Combustion

, 83:511

Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Swirl Induced Self-Excited Instabilities at the Vicinity of an Airblast Nozzle

Article

Abstract

We report on the experimental and numerical investigation of swirl induced self-excited instabilities in the form of precessing helical structures at the vicinity of an Airblast Atomiser. Within the scope of this work, the increase of the knowledge of the fundamental factors governing the precessing vortex core phenomenon (PVC) (Gupta et al. 1984) by applying dual air-flow Airblast nozzles is aimed. This study concentrates on the experimental investigation of the impact of important parameters of a combustor system on the performance characteristics of this instability. In particular, in terms of this work the properties of the PVC are determined by applying two different Airblast Atomisers, one of them producing an attached swirl flame, and another producing a lifted swirl flame. Measurements are also performed for a confined and a non confined flame, aiming to determine the impact of the confining duct on the performance of the PVC. In order to gain some further knowledge, regarding the impact of this aerodynamic instability on combustion of gaseous fuel, the features of PVC are experimentally identified under reacting conditions, by employing a laser light sheet (LLS) measurement technique. By applying the LLS measurement technique, further investigation on the nature of the PVC is also attempted. The power spectral density (PSD) function of the flow field was determined on the basis of raw data provided by 3D Laser Doppler Anemometry (3D-LDA). In order to validate the measurement technique as well as the nature of the instability, the planar Mie-Scattering of the flow was evaluated by employing a high speed camera performing at 12 kHz. The precessing character of the flow was also confirmed by means of a numerical simulation using the 3D Reynolds Stress Model (3D-RSM). The results of the numerical investigation provided some useful information concerning the onset of the instability within the primary swirler as well as its size and amplitude. According to this analysis, a high frequency instability was confirmed within a region of about one burner diameter downstream of the burner exit. Finally an evaluation of the (LDA) method in terms of providing accurate (PSD) was performed for the case of a swirl flow field.

Keywords

Precessing vortex core (PVC) Swirl flows Airblast Atomiser Single helix structure High frequency instability Self excited aerodynamic instability 

References

  1. 1.
    Gupta, A.K., et al.: Swirl Flows. Abacus, Tunbridge Wells (1984)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Froud, D., et al.: Phase averaging of the precessing vortex core in a swirl burner under piloted and premixed combustion conditions. Combust. Flame 100, 407–412 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fick, W., et al.: Visualisation of the precessing vortex core in an unconfined swirling flow. Opt. Diagn. Eng. 2(1), 19–31 (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Syred, N., et al.: A review of oscillation mechanisms and the role of the precessing vortex core (PVC) in swirl combustion systems. Progr. Energy Combust. Sci. 32, 93–161 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Froud, D.: Ph.D. thesis, University of Wales, Cardiff (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fick, W.: Ph.D. thesis, Cardiff University (1968)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lehmann, B., et al.: Turbulence behaviour of swirled dual-stream nozzle flows without and with combustion. In: 11 DGLR STAB Fachsymposium (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Michalke, A.: Absolute inviscid instability of a ring jet with back-flow and swirl. Eur. J. Mech. B, Fluids 18(1), 3–12 (1999)MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dannecker, R., et al.: High Frequency Periodic Flow Oscillations Downstream of a Fuel Atomizer Nozzle. ISABE, München (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gouldin, F., et al.: Periodic oscillations observed in swirling flows with and without combustion. In: 20th International Symposium on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, pp. 269–276 (1984)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boehm, B., et al.: Experimental investigation on turbulence structure in a three-nozzle combustor. In: Proceedings of Turbo Expo, GT 2007-27111 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schneider, et al.: Numerical study of the precessing vortex core in a confined partially premixed swirl combustion system. In: Proceedings of Turbo Expo, GT 2007-27272 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bowen, P.J., et al.: Rotating instabilities in swirling and cyclonic flows, part B: theoretical analysis. In: Zhang, D., Nathan, G. (eds.) Thermal Energy Engineering and the Environment, pp. 197–220. Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Adelaide, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Merkle, K.: Einfluss Gleich- und Gegensinniger Drehrichtung der Verbrennungslufströme auf die Stabilisierung Turbulenter Doppeldrall-Diffusionsflammen. Diss., Universität Karlsruhe (2006) (in German)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zarzalis, N. et al.: Fuel Injection Apparatus. Patent No. DE 10 2005 022 772.4, EP 06 009 563.5 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fokaides, P.A., et al.: Experimental investigation of the stabilization mechanism and emissions of a lifted swirl non-premixed flame. In: Proceedings of Turbo Expo, GT 2007-27126 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Burger, M.: Gemischbildung in Hochdruckbrennkammern: Numerische Ansätze zur Berechnung Instationärer Zweiphasenströmungen. Diss., Universität Karlsruhe (2005) (in German)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    ANSYS CFX-Solver theory guide. ANSYS CFX release 11.0 (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barth, T.J., et al.: The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes. In: AIAA Paper 89-0366 (1989)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wetzel, F., et al.: Final report on validation of JPDF module and LBO calculations—deliverable report D2.7a. European community, G4RD-CT-2002-00644 (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wetzel, F., et al.: Numerical investigation of lean blow out of a model gas turbine combustion chamber using a presumed JPDF-reaction model by taking heat loss processes into account. In: Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wetzel, F.: Numerische Untersuchungen zur Stabilität Nicht-Vorgemischter, Doppelt-Verdrallter Flammen. Diss., Universität Karlsruhe (2007) (in German)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nobach, H., et al.: Efficient estimation of power spectral density from laser Doppler anemometer data. Exp. Fluids 24, 499–509 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    BSA Flow Software V. 2.1, Dantec Dynamics (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wegner, B., et al.: Evaluation of URANS performance in predicting an unconfined swirling flow with precessing vortex core based on LES and experiments. In: Proceedings TSFP3, vol. 1, pp. 51–57Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Oseen, C.W.: Hydrodynamik (p. 132). Leipzig (1927)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tchen, C.M.: Mean value and correlation problems connected with the motion of small particles suspended in a turbulent fluid. Ph.D. thesis, Delft (1947)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Soo, S.L.: Fluid Dynamics of Multiphase Systems. Blaisdell, Waltham (1967)MATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Meyers, J.F.: Generation of particles and seeding, lecture series 1991–08. In: von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics. NASA—Langley Research Center, Hampton (1991)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Adrian, R.J., et al.: Power spectra of fluid velocities measured by laser Doppler velocimetry. Exp. Fluids 5, 17–28 (1987)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gjelstrup, P., et al.: Experimental verification of novel spectral analysis algorithms for laser doppler anemometry data. In: Proc. 10th Int. Symposium on Apply of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics. Lisbon, Portugal (2000)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schildmacher, K.U.: Experimentelle Charakterisierung der Instabilitäten Vorgemischter Flammen in Gasturbinen-Brennkammern. Diss., Universität Karlsruhe (2005) (in German)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Engler-Bunte-InstituteUniversity of Karlsruhe (TH)KarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations