Advertisement

Attack rate and prey preference of Lasioseius subterraneous and Protogamasellus mica on four nematode species

Abstract

Plant parasitic nematodes are common and important global pests, causing over US$150 billion in crop losses across the agricultural sector worldwide. Meloidogyne javanica and Pratylenchus zeae are two of the most damaging plant-parasitic nematodes and there are limited options for their control. We evaluated the potential of a large (Lasioseius subterraneous) and a small (Protogamasellus mica) mesostigmatan mite as biological control agents of plant-parasitic nematodes. We tested the attack rate and reproductive potential of these two mite species on four nematode species: M. javanica (eggs), Pra. zeae (adults) and two microbivorous nematodes, Mesorhabditis sp. and Aphelenchus avenae (adults for both species). Each mite/nematode combination (1 mite:100 nematodes) was tested in six replicate arenas. In a separate trial, each mite species was presented with 50 A. avenae and 50 Pra. zeae in the same arena to determine prey preference. Both mite species significantly reduced the abundance of all nematode species used in the trials when compared to nematode-only controls. Lasioseius subterraneous consumed all available M. javanica eggs within 72 h. The larger mite had a significantly higher overall attack rate than the smaller mite, each consuming an average of 96 and 72 nematodes, respectively, within 72 h. However, both mites had a similar reproductive rate. Protogamasellus mica displayed a positive preference towards the plant parasitic nematode Pra. zeae over the fungal feeding A. avenae whereas L. subterraneous did not display a prey preference. Our results highlight the potential of these two predators to control plant parasitic nematodes, although further trials under field conditions are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Abou-Awad BA, Korayem AM, Hassan MF, Abou-Elela MA (2001) Life history of the predatory mite Lasioseius athiasae (Acari, Ascidae) on various kinds of food substances: a polypeptide analysis of prey consideration. J Appl Entomol 125:125–130

  2. Azevedo L, Leite L, Chacon-Orozco J, Moreira M, Ferreira M, Cano L, Borges V, Rueda-Ramírez D, De Moraes G, Palevsky E (2019) Free living nematodes as alternative prey for soil predatory mites: an interdisciplinary case study of conservation biological control. Biol Control 132:128–134

  3. Benhadi-Marin J, Alberto Pereira J, Barreales D, Paulo Sousa J, Santos (2018) A simulation-based method to compare the pest suppression potential of predators: a case study with spiders. Biol Control 123:87–96

  4. Blair BL, Stirling GR, Whittle PJL (1999) Distribution of pest nematodes on sugarcane in south Queensland and relationship to soil texture, cultivar, crop age and region. Aust J Exp Agric 39:43–50

  5. Bonkowski M, Villenave C, Griffiths B (2009) Rhizosphere fauna: the functional and structural diversity of intimate interactions of soil fauna with plant roots. Plant Soil 321:213–233

  6. Britto EPJ, Gago E, Moraes GJ (2012) How promising is Lasioseius floridensis as a control agent of Polyphagotarsonemus latus? Exp Appl Acarol 56:221–231

  7. Castillo P, Volvas N (2007) Pratylenchus (Nematoda: Pratylenchidae); diagnosis, biology, pathogenicity and management. Brill, Leiden

  8. Chesson J (1978) Measuring preference in selective predation. Ecol 59:211–215

  9. Chesson J (1983) The estimation and analysis of preference and its relationship to foraging models. Ecol 64:1297–1304

  10. DeBach P, Rosen D (1991) Biological control by natural enemies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  11. Harwood JD, Phillips SW, Lello J, Sunderland KD, Glen DM, Bruford MW, Harper GL, Symondson WOC (2009) Invertebrate biodiversity affects predator fitness and hence potential to control pests in crops. Biol Control 51:499–506

  12. Hassell MP (1978) The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  13. Hassell MP, May RM (1986) Generalist and specialist natural enemies in insect predator-prey interactions. J Anim Ecol 55:923–940

  14. Hawkins BA, Cornell HV (1999) Theoretical approaches to biological control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  15. Hoy MA (1994) Parasitoids and predators in management of arthropod pests. In: Metcalf RL, Luckmann WH (eds) Introduction to insect pest management. Wiley, New York, pp 129–198

  16. Huffaker CB (1971) Biological control. Plenum, London/New York

  17. Hussey RS, Mims CW (1991) Ultrastructure of feeding tubes formed in giant-cells induced by the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Protoplasma 162:99–107

  18. Imbriani JL, Mankau R (1983) Studies on Lasioseius scapulatus, a mesostigmatid mite predacious on nematodes. J Nematol 15:523–528

  19. Jones M, Fosu-Nyarko J (2014) Molecular biology of root lesion nematodes (Pratylenchus spp.) and their interaction with host plants. Ann Appl Biol 164:163–181

  20. Krantz GW, Walter DE (2009) A manual of acarology. Texas Tech University Press, Texas

  21. Manly BFJ (1974) A model for certain types of selection experiments. Biometrics 30:281–294

  22. Manwaring M, Wallace HM, Weaver HJ (2018) Effects of a mulch layer on the assemblage and abundance of mesostigmatan mites and other arthropods in the soil of a sugarcane agro-ecosystem in Australia. Exp Appl Acarol 74(3):291–300

  23. Murdoch WW, Chesson J, Chesson PL (1985) Biological control in theory and practice. Am Nat 125:344–366

  24. Navarro-Campos C, Wäckers FL, Pekas A (2016) Impact of factitious foods and prey on the oviposition of the predatory mites Gaeolaelaps aculeifer and Stratiolaelaps scimitus (Acari: Laelapidae). Exp Appl Acarol 70:69–78

  25. Nicol JM, Turner SJ, Coyne DL, Den Nijs L, Hockland S, Maafi ZT (2011) Current nematode threats to world agriculture. In: Jones JT, Gheysen G, Fenoll C (eds) Genomics and molecular genetics of plant-nematode interactions. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 21–44

  26. Rasmy A, Nasr A, Reda A (1987) Reproductive response and development of three soil predaceous mites utilizing the acarid mite Tyrophagus casei Oud. as an alternate diet. Anz Schadlingskde Pflanzenschutz Umweltschutz 60:92–94

  27. Queiroz OS, Ramos RS, Gontijo LM, Picanço MC (2015) Functional response of three species of predatory pirate bugs attacking eggs of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Enviro Entomol 44:246–251

  28. Prischmann D, Knutson E, Dashiell K, Lundgren J (2011) Generalist-feeding subterranean mites as potential biological control agents of immature corn rootworms. Exp Appl Acarol 55:233–248

  29. Read DS, Sheppard SK, Bruford MW, Glen DM, Symondson WOC (2006) Molecular detection of predation by soil micro-arthropods on nematodes. Mol Ecol 15:1963–1972

  30. Salehi A, Ostovan H, Modarresi M (2014) Evaluation of the efficiency of Gaeolaelaps aculeifer in control of plant parasitic nematode Tylenchulus semipenetrans under greenhouse conditions. J Entomol Nematol 6:150–153

  31. Singh S, Singh B, Singh AP (2015) Nematodes: a threat to sustainability of agriculture. Proced Environ Sci 29:215–216

  32. Stirling GR (2014) Biological control of plant-parasitic nematodes: soil ecosystem management in sustainable agriculture, 2nd edn. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 536

  33. Stirling GR, Stirling MA, Walter DE (2017) The mesostigmatid mite Protogamasellus mica, an effective predator of free-living and plant-parasitic nematodes. J Nematol 49:327–333

  34. Symondson WOC, Sunderland KD, Greenstone MH (2002) Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents? Annu Rev Entomol 47:561–594

  35. Taha HA, Al-Assiuty AI, Sharra LA, Farid W (2014) The potential of two different Acari species (Mesostigmata and Oribatida) on suppression of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) on tomato plants. Glob J Environ Sci Toxicol 1:119–135

  36. Torbert HA, Wood CW (1992) Effects of soil compaction and water-filled pore space on soil microbial activity and N losses. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 23:1321–1331

  37. Van Leeuwen E, Jansen VAA, Bright PW (2007) How population dynamics shape the functional response in a one-predator-two-prey system. Ecology 88:1571–1581

  38. Walter DE, Ikonen EK (1989) Species, guilds, and functional groups: taxonomy and behavior in nematophagous arthropods. J Nematol 21:315–327

  39. Walter DE, Proctor H (2013) Mites: ecology, evolution & behaviour: life at a microscale. Springer, Amsterdam

  40. Walter DE, Sterling GR (2018) Microarthropods in Australian sugarcanesoils: a survey with emphasis on the Mesostigmata as potential regulators of nematode populations. Acaralogia 58:673–682

  41. Woodward G, Hildrew AG (2002) Body-size determinants of niche overlap and intraguild predation within a complex food web. J Anim Ecol 71:1063–1074

  42. Xu CL, Chen YL, Xu XN, Wang DW, Xie H, Wang ED, Li DS, Zhang BX, Qin HG (2014) Evaluation of Blattisocius dolichus (Acari: Blattisociidae) for biocontrol of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita (Tylenchida: Heteroderidae). BioControl 59:617–624

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by Sugar Research Australia and an Australian Postgraduate Award (now Research Training Program) to MM through the Australian Government’s Department of Education and Training, and the University of the Sunshine Coast. We thank Graham Stirling for his contributions to earlier drafts of the manuscript and for provision (operating as Biological Crop Protection) of mites and nematodes used in experiments.

Author information

Correspondence to M. Manwaring.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Manwaring, M., Nahrung, H.F. & Wallace, H. Attack rate and prey preference of Lasioseius subterraneous and Protogamasellus mica on four nematode species. Exp Appl Acarol 80, 29–41 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-019-00456-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mesostigmata
  • Rootknot nematode
  • Lesion nematode
  • Biocontrol