Experimental and Applied Acarology

, Volume 76, Issue 1, pp 109–121 | Cite as

Population development of the predatory mite Amblydromalus limonicus is modulated by habitat dispersion, diet and density of conspecifics

  • Jian-Feng Liu
  • Jacqueline R. Beggs
  • Zhi-Qiang ZhangEmail author


Habitat dispersion, diet and density can influence the per capita population growth of predators, and dispersed habitat can provide a spatial refuge that reduces the possibility of cannibalism among predators, thereby increasing their realized population growth rate. We tested the influence of variable habitat dispersion (dispersed patches, general patches and aggregated patches), two diets (Typha orientalis pollen and Ephestia kuehniella eggs) and initial predator density—one or two Amblydromalus limonicus (Garman and McGregor) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) founder females—on the population growth of A. limonicus in 7 days. Dispersed patches resulted in a higher total number of A. limonicus than the other two types of habitat dispersion from days 3–7 when fed on either of the diets, and started with either one or two A. limonicus females. Compared with E. kuehniella eggs, T. orientalis pollen resulted in more A. limonicus regardless of one or two founder females. Compared with two founder females, beginning with one founder female on pollen produced significantly more predatory mite females in dispersed and aggregated patches. A four-way ANOVA showed that the main effects indicated that habitat, diet, density, and time significantly influenced the number of immature and female A. limonicus. Significant interactions between habitat dispersion and diet were detected on immature and female A. limonicus. Our findings suggest that increasing the dispersion of artificial shelters on crop leaves may stimulate the control efficiency of predators in greenhouses. Furthermore, T. orientalis pollen provides a high nutritional quality supplemental diet that could enhance the ability of A. limonicus to control pests.


Habitat dispersion Diet Density Amblydromalus limonicus Population growth 



We are grateful to Chris Winks (Landcare Research, Auckland) for technical support and Mrs Anne Austin (Landcare Research, Palmerston North) for review and comments. We also thank Miss Guangyun Li (The University of Auckland, Tamaki Campus) for help in maintaining the A. limonicus population. J.-F Liu would like to express his gratitude to The University of Auckland for financial support. Z.-Q. Zhang was supported mainly by Core Funding for Crown Research Institutes from the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment’s Science and Innovation Group. In addition, this paper was also supported in part by a subcontract on A. limonicus rearing from Plant and Food Research (Christchurch).


  1. Adar E, Inbar M, Gal S, Gan-Mor S, Palevsky E (2014) Pollen on-twine for food provisioning and oviposition of predatory mites in protected crops. Biocontrol 59:307–317. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal AA, Karban R (1997) Domatia mediate plant-arthropod mutualism. Nature 387:562–563. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartlett J (1987) Filial cannibalism in burying beetles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:179–183. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chorąży A, Kropczyńska-Linkiewicz D, Sas D, Escudero-Colomar LA (2016) Distribution of Amblydromalus limonicus in northeastern Spain and diversity of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in tomato and other vegetable crops after its introduction. Exp Appl Acarol 69(4):465–478. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Collins JP, Cheek JE (1983) Effect of food and density on development of typical and cannibalistic salamander larvae in Ambystoma tigrinum nebulosum. Am Zool 23:77–84. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Creighton JC (2005) Population density, body size, and phenotypic plasticity of brood size in a burying beetle. Behav Ecol 16:1031–1036. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Croft BA, Croft MB (1996) Intra-and interspecific predation among adult female phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae): effects on survival and reproduction. Environ Entomol 25:853–858. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crowley PH (1981) Dispersal and the stability of predator-prey interactions. Am Nat 118:673–701. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Delisle J, Shipp L, Brodeur J (2015) Apple pollen as a supplemental food source for the control of western flower thrips by two predatory mites, Amblyseius swirskii and Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae), on potted chrysanthemum. Exp Appl Acarol 65:495–509. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Duarte MVA, Venzon M, Bittencourt MCde S, Rodríguez-Cruz FA, Pallini A, Janssen A (2015) Alternative food promotes broad mite control on chilli pepper plants. Biocontrol 60:817–825. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. English-Loeb G, Norton AP, Walker MA (2002) Behavioral and population consequences of acarodomatia in grapes on phytoseiid mites (Mesostigmata) and implications for plant breeding. Entomol Exp Appl 104:307–319. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Faraji F, Janssen A, Sabelis MW (2002) Oviposition patterns in a predatory mite reduce the risk of egg predation caused by prey. Ecol Entomol 27:660–664. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferreira JAM, Eshuis B, Janssen A, Sabelis MW (2008) Domatia reduce larval cannibalism in predatory mites. Ecol Entomol 33:374–379. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghasemzadeh S, Leman A, Messelink GJ (2017) Biological control of Echinothrips americanus by phytoseiid predatory mites and the effect of pollen as supplemental food. Exp Appl Acarol 73(2):209–221. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghazy NA, Osakabe M, Negm MW, Schausberger P, Gotoh T, Amano H (2016) Phytoseiid mites under environmental stress. Biol Control 96:120–134. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grostal R, O’Dowd DJ (1994) Plants, mites and mutualism: leaf domatia and the abundance and reproduction of mites on Viburnum tinus (Caprifoliaceae). Oecologia 97:308–315. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoogerbrugge H, van Houten Y, Knapp M, Bolckmans K (2011) Biological control of thrips and whitefly on strawberries with Amblydromalus limonicus and Amblyseius swirskii. IOBC/WPRS Bull 68:65–69Google Scholar
  18. Huffaker CB (1958) Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations. Hilgardia 27:343–383. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huffaker CB, Shea KP, Herman SG (1963) Experimental studies on predation: complex dispersion and levels of food in an acarine predator-prey interaction. Hilgardia 34:305–330. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Janssen A, Sabelis MW (2015) Alternative food and biological control by generalist predatory mites: the case of Amblyseius swirskii. Exp Appl Acarol 65:413–418. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Janssen A, Sabelis MW, Magalhães S, Montserrat M, Van der Hammen T (2007) Habitat structure affects intraguild predation. Ecology 88:2713–2719. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ji J, Zhang Y-X, Saito Y, Takada T, Tsuji N (2016) Competitive and predacious interactions among three phytoseiid species under experimental conditions (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Environ Entomol 45:46–52. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kar F, Lin S, Zhang ZQ (2015) Neocypholaelaps novaehollandiae Evans (Acari: Ameroseiidae) rediscovered: experiments on its life history and behaviour. NZ Entomol 38(2):126–133. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khanamani M, Fathipour Y, Talebi AA, Mehrabadi M (2017) How pollen supplementary diet affect life table and predation capacity of Neoseiulus californicus on two-spotted spider mite. Syst Appl Acarol 22:135–147. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knapp M, van Houten Y, Hoogerbrugge H, Bolckmans K (2013) Amblydromalus limonicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) as a biocontrol agent: literature review and new findings. Acarologia 53:191–202. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee MH, Zhang ZQ (2016) Habitat structure and its influence on populations of Amblydromalus limonicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Syst Appl Acarol 21:1361–1378. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee MH, Zhang ZQ (2018) Assessing the augmentation of Amblydromalus limonicus with the supplementation of pollen, thread, and substrates to combat greenhouse whitefly populations. Sci Rep 8(1):12189.  CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Leman A, Messelink GJ (2015) Supplemental food that supports both predator and pest: a risk for biological control? Exp Appl Acarol 65:511–524. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Li G-Y, Zhang Z-Q (2016) Some factors affecting the development, survival and prey consumption of Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae) feeding on Tetranychus urticae eggs (Acari: Tetranychidae). Syst Appl Acarol 21:555–566. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu J-F, Zhang Z-Q (2017) Development, survival and reproduction of a New Zealand strain of Amblydromalus limonicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on Typha orientalis pollen, Ephestia kuehniella eggs, and an artificial diet. Int J Acarol 43:153–159. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Loughner R, Wentworth K, Loeb G, Nyrop J (2010) Leaf trichomes influence predatory mite densities through dispersal behavior. Entomol Exp Appl 134:78–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Loughner R, Nyrop J, Wentworth K, Sanderson J (2011) Effects of supplemental pollen and fibers on canopy abundance of Amblyseius swirskii. IOBC/WPRS Bull 68:105–109. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McMurtry J, Croft B (1997) Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annu Rev Entomol 42:291–321. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. McMurtry JA, Scriven GT (1965) Life-history studies of Amblyseius limonicus, with comparative observations on Amblyseius hibisci (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 58:106–111. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Messelink GJ, Van Steenpaal SEF, Ramakers PMJ (2006) Evaluation of phytoseiid predators for control of western flower thrips on greenhouse cucumber. Biocontrol 51:753–768. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nguyen DT, Vangansbeke D, De Clercq P (2015) Performance of four species of phytoseiid mites on artificial and natural diets. Biol Control 80:56–62. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oveja MF, Riudavets J, Arnó J, Gabarra R (2016) Does a supplemental food improve the effectiveness of predatory bugs on cucumber? Biocontrol 61:47–56. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Patel K, Zhang Z-Q (2017a) Prey preference and reproduction of predatory mites, Amblydromalus limonicus and Neoseiulus cucumeris, on eggs and 1st instar nymphs of the tomato/potato psyllid. Int J Acarol 43(6):468–474. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Patel K, Zhang ZQ (2017b) Functional and numerical responses of Amblydromalus limonicus and Neoseiulus cucumeris to eggs and first instar nymph of tomato/potato psyllid (Bactericera cockerelli). Syst Appl Acarol 22(9):476–1488. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Polis GA (1981) The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 12:225–251. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pozzebon A, Loeb GM, Duso C (2015) Role of supplemental foods and habitat structural complexity in persistence and coexistence of generalist predatory mites. Sci Rep 5:14997. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Rasmy AH, El-Banhawy EM (1974) Behaviour and bionomics of the predatory mite, Phytoseius plumifer [Acarina: Phytoseiidae] as affected by physical surface features of host plants. Entomophaga 19:255–257. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Richardson ML, Mitchell RF, Reagel PF, Hanks LM (2010) Causes and consequences of cannibalism in noncarnivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 55:39–53. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Roda A, Nyrop J, English-Loeb G, Dicke M (2001) Leaf pubescence and two-spotted spider mite webbing influence phytoseiid behavior and population density. Oecologia 129:551–560. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Roda A, Nyrop J, English-Loeb G (2003) Leaf pubescence mediates the abundance of non-prey food and the density of the predatory mite Typhlodromus pyri. Exp Appl Acarol 29:193–211. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Rotem KA, Agrawal AA (2003) Density dependent population growth of the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, on the host plant Leonurus cardiaca. Oikos 103:559–565. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Samaras K, Pappas ML, Fytas E, Broufas GD (2015) Pollen suitability for the development and reproduction of Amblydromalus limonicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Biocontrol 60:773–782. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schausberger P (2003) Cannibalism among phytoseiid mites: a review. Exp Appl Acarol 29:173–191. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Schausberger P, Croft BA (2000a) Cannibalism and intraguild predation among phytoseiid mites: are aggressiveness and prey preference related to diet specialization? Exp Appl Acarol 24:709–725. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Schausberger P, Croft BA (2000b) Nutritional benefits of intraguild predation and cannibalism among generalist and specialist phytoseiid mites. Ecol Entomol 25:473–480. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schmidt RA (2014) Leaf structures affect predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and biological control: a review. Exp Appl Acarol 62:1–17. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Sudo M, Osakabe M (2013) Stellate hairs on leaves of a deciduous shrub Viburnum erosum var. punctatum (Adoxaceae) effectively protect Brevipalpus obovatus (Acari: Tenuipalpidae) eggs from the predator Phytoseius nipponicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp Appl Acarol 60:299–311. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Tilney PM, van Wyk AE, van der Merwe CF (2012) Structural evidence in Plectroniella armata (Rubiaceae) for possible material exchange between domatia and mites. PLoS ONE 7:e39984. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Van Buskirk J (1989) Density-dependent cannibalism in larval dragonflies. Ecology 70:1442–1449. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. van Rijn PCJ, van Houten YM, Sabelis MW (2002) How plants benefit from providing food to predators even when it is also edible to herbivores. Ecology 83(10):2664–2679.;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vangansbeke D, Nguyen DT, Audenaert J, Verhoeven R, Deforce K, Gobin B, Tirry L, De Clercq P (2014a) Diet-dependent cannibalism in the omnivorous phytoseiid mite Amblydromalus limonicus. Biol Control 74:30–35. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vangansbeke D, Nguyen DT, Audenaert J, Verhoeven R, Gobin B, Tirry L, De Clercq P (2014b) Food supplementation affects interactions between a phytoseiid predator and its omnivorous prey. Biol Control 76:95–100. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vangansbeke D, Nguyen DT, Audenaert J, Verhoeven R, Gobin B, Tirry L, De Clercq P (2014c) Performance of the predatory mite Amblydromalus limonicus on factitious foods. Biocontrol 59:67–77. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vangansbeke D, Nguyen DT, Audenaert J, Gobin B, Tirry L, De Clercq P (2016a) Establishment of Amblyseius swirskii in greenhouse crops using food supplements. Syst Appl Acarol 21:1174–1184. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vangansbeke D, Nguyen DT, Audenaert J, Verhoeven R, Gobin B, Tirry L, De Clercq P (2016b) Supplemental food for Amblyseius swirskii in the control of thrips: feeding friend or foe? Pest Manag Sci 72:466–473. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Walls SC (1998) Density dependence in a larval salamander: the effects of interference and food limitation. Copeia 4:926–935. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wildy EL, Chivers DP, Kiesecker JM, Blaustein AR (2001) The effects of food level and conspecific density on biting and cannibalism in larval long-toed salamanders, Ambystoma macrodactylum. Oecologia 128:202–209. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Wong SK, Frank SD (2013) Pollen increases fitness and abundance of Orius insidiosus Say (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) on banker plants. Biol Control 64(1):45–50. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Xu Y, Zhang Z-Q (2015) Amblydromalus limonicus: a “new association” predatory mite against an invasive psyllid (Bactericera cockerelli) in New Zealand. Syst Appl Acarol 20:375–382. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Biodiversity and Biosecurity, School of Biological SciencesThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Landcare ResearchAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations